Примеры использования Has not submitted sufficient на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Second, Iraq asserts that GPIC has not submitted sufficient or accurate evidence of such alleged losses.
The State party has also submitted that the communication should be held inadmissible as the author has not submitted sufficient evidence to support a prima facie case.
One State has not submitted sufficient information to allow for an assessment of its counter-terrorism efforts.
Furthermore, the State party submits that both the claim under article 18 andthe claim under article 19 should be held inadmissible on the ground that the author has not submitted sufficient evidence to substantiate a prima facie claim.
The Committee findsthat at this stage, the author has not submitted sufficient proof to establish his authority to act on behalf of the victim.
With regard to the complainant's allegation that the decision to return him to India would in itself constitute an act of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment in contravention of article 16 of the Convention,the Committee notes that the complainant has not submitted sufficient evidence in substantiation of this claim.
However the Committee deems that the complainant has not submitted sufficient details or corroborating evidence to shift the burden of proof.
While welcoming the information provided by the delegation on the number of complaints relating to racial discrimination considered by the National Human Rights Commission of Korea,the Committee regrets that the State party has not submitted sufficient information regarding the nature and outcome of these cases art. 6.
Iraq contends that LC Holding has not submitted sufficient evidence to substantiate its claim for the employee-related losses incurred by LCV.
In this connection, the Committee, irrespective of the question regarding the complainant's affiliation with the church, is of the view that he has not submitted sufficient evidence to substantiate that he would risk being subjected to torture by the authorities if returned to China.
In the view of the Panel,Saudi Arabia has not submitted sufficient evidence to establish the nature or extent of the damage, or to support its estimation of crop losses that it claims to have suffered.
Moreover, the Committee considers that the author has not submitted sufficient information for it to conclude that the pending appeal is ineffective.
The Panel, therefore,concludes that Iran has not submitted sufficient evidence to link the proposed programme to Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait or to justify the claimed costs of the project.
On the basis of the above, the Committee has formed the opinion that the complainant has not submitted sufficient satisfactory details or corroborating evidence to substantiate the fact of his detentions by, and treatment at the hands of, the Azerbaijani authorities or the alleged criminal investigation against him and the related arrest warrant.
Therefore, the Panel concluded that the claimant had not submitted sufficient evidence to establish the facts and circumstances of the claim.
The"E4" Panel recommended no compensation for the claim when it was reviewed,as the claimant had not submitted sufficient information or documents to support its asserted losses.
However, the"E4" Panel recommended no compensation for the claims when they were reviewed as the claimants had not submitted sufficient information or documents to support their asserted losses.
In those cases, the"E4" Panel recommended no compensation for the claims when they were reviewed,as the"E4" claimants had not submitted sufficient information or documents to support their asserted losses.
The"E4" Panel recommended no compensation for the claim whenit was originally reviewed, as the"E4" claimant had not submitted sufficient information or documents to support its asserted losses.
Bearing in mind, however, that the buyer had not paid in full for the goods delivered and had not submitted sufficient evidence to support the scale of its claims, the tribunal reduced the buyer's damages to 60 per cent of the claimed amount.
The three"E4" claims were considered in the second instalment of"E4" claims and the"E4" Panel recommended no compensation for the claims when they were reviewed,as the"E4" claimants had not submitted sufficient information or documents to support their asserted losses.
The complainant's application for political refugee status to OFPRA had previously been rejected,on 23 August 1995, on the grounds that he had not submitted sufficient evidence to prove that he was personally in one of the situations for which article 1(A)(2) of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees provides.
With regard to the authors' allegation that the decision to expel them would in itself constitute an act of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment in contravention of article 16 of the Convention,the Committee notes that the authors have not submitted sufficient evidence in substantiation of this claim.
The Committee, irrespective of the question regarding the complainant's affiliation with the church,was of the view that he had not submitted sufficient evidence to substantiate that he would risk being subjected to torture by the authorities if returned to China, and concluded that the removal of the complainants to China by the State party would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
Moreover, the authors have not submitted to the Committee sufficient or relevant information on the case law of the Spanish Constitutional Court relating to the rights protected under article 17, paragraph 1, which might enable it to conclude that the remedies would have been ineffective.
Based on the NHRIs' compliance with the Paris Principles, GANHRI's Sub-Committee on Accreditation accredits the NHRI with: A status for being in full compliance with the Paris Principles;B status for not being fully in compliance with the Paris Principles or for not having submitted sufficient documentation to make that determination; or C status for being non-compliant with the Paris Principles.
The State party submits that the complainant has not provided sufficient evidence in substantiation of his claim that, by extraditing him, Australia will breach article 3 of the Convention.
The Committee considers that,based on all the information submitted, the complainant has not provided sufficient evidence to allow it to consider that his return to Côte d'Ivoire would put him at a real, present and personal risk of being subjected to torture.
The Committee concludes that, on the basis of all the information submitted, the complainant has not adduced sufficient evidence for it to consider that he would run a foreseeable, real and personal risk of being subjected to torture if he were returned to his country of origin.
The Group submitted several business proposals but didn't have sufficient resources to invest into fundraising activities, trainings and forums.