Примеры использования Panel has determined на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Panel has determined the date of loss for each claim.
With the assistance of its consultants, the Panel has determined that such portion is equal to US$7,275.
The Panel has determined that there is no overlap in the claimed losses.
All or part of the loss occurred outside the period of time during which the Panel has determined that a loss may be directly related to Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
The Panel has determined that price increases caused by these factors are compensable.
All or part of the loss occurred outside the period of time during which the Panel has determined that a loss may be directly related to Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
The Panel has determined that there is no overlap between Hyder's claim and the other claim.
All or part of the loss occurred outside the geographical area within which the Panel has determined that a loss may be directly related to Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
The Panel has determined that the collapse of the Project was the direct result of Iraq's invasion of Kuwait.
All or part of the loss occurred outside the geographical area within which the Panel has determined that a loss may be directly related to Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
The Panel has determined that those claims do not overlap with or relate to the claim of Metro Consultants.
All or part of the loss occurred outside the geographical area within which the Panel has determined that a loss may be directly related to Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.See para. 77.
The Panel has determined that the Government of the Sudan continues to violate the arms embargo in the following ways.
Where applicable, the Panel has determined the date of loss for each claim.G.
The Panel has determined that the claim of NIOC's subsidiary IOOC should be considered separately from those of NIOC.
Where applicable, the Panel has determined the date of loss for each claim.
The Panel has determined that it remains relatively easy to obtain surface-to-air missiles and import them into Somalia.
Where applicable, the Panel has determined the date of loss for each claim.
The Panel has determined that China North Industries Corporation(NORINCO) and China Xinshidai Company are the manufacturers of this type of ammunition.
However, given the large number of claims received in category“C”, the Panel has determined that those claims that can be processed efficiently through fast-track processing methodologies will be addressed first.
The Panel has determined that this claimed loss is more appropriately reclassified as separate claims for contract losses, loss of tangible property, and financial losses.
Based on the advice of its consultants, the Panel has determined that scaffolding boards of this type and in this location would have a maximum useful life of approximately 4 years.
The Panel has determined that Montgomery's claim does not include losses incurred by the joint venture or Montgomery's joint venture partner.
Given the large number of claims received in category“C”, the Panel has determined that those claims that can be processed efficiently through database-assisted techniques will continue to be addressed first.
The Panel has determined that the Governments of Chad and the Sudan have failed to fully implement the aforementioned provisions of resolutions 1591(2005) and 1672 2006.
As importantly, such accounts also reflected costs that the Panel has determined to be not compensable(e.g. increased cost of fuel), as well as operating costs associated with operations outside the compensable area or period.
The Panel has determined that Enka could not reasonably expect that the Commission would provide a remedy for costs incurred after the filing date of its claim.
In order to do so, the Panel has determined the rate of annual return on construction costs of each of the other stations.
The Panel has determined that the appropriate depreciation rate is one that would result in the complete depreciation of the equipment over the life of the Project.
In some cases, however, the Panel has determined that the depreciation utilized was not reasonable given the equipment in question.