Примеры использования Party explained на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The State party explained that the authors were serving their sentences in the UYA 64/71 colony in Jaslyk.
Concerning parliamentary immunities, the State party explained that there are two types.
The State party explained that this was done in accordance with the law then in force.
By note verbale of 2 April 2012, the State party explained that its position remains unchanged.
The State party explained the domestic procedure applicable to the determination of refugee status.
Люди также переводят
In its response to the Committee of 16 June 2005, the State party explained that nine cantons had such machinery.
One State party explained that its police attachés were posted with some of its embassies abroad.
The concern of possible double counting of emission reductions raised as a cause for concern about the environmental integrity of emission offset, and one Party explained that this was one of the reasons why it is not in favour of the use of such mechanisms.
On 21 January 2008, the State party explained the role of the officer of the public prosecutor's department.
The Party explained that this change in the pattern of net emissions from this sector was a consequence of an implemented policy.
By note verbale of 13 April 2012, the State party explained that it had given careful consideration to the Committee's Views.
The State party explained that in fact the author had been provided with certain information concerning the death penalty, prior to its abolition in the State party and before the adoption of the Committee's Views.
On 28 October 2008, the State party explained that the complainants had applied for asylum on 3 September 2003.
The State party explained that it was unable to discharge its responsibilities with regard to the promotion and protection of human rights in Kosovo and Metohija.
It would be useful, for example, if the State party explained to what extent the conflict in the eastern part of the country had been responsible for emigration.
The State party explained that it would inform the Committee of the decision of its Migration Board concerning the complainant's permit.
On 3 January 2012, the State party explained that the Office of the Prosecutor General had examined the Committee's Views.
The Party explained that its data collection efforts had been hampered by the delay in receiving assistance, which had primarily been a consequence of the numerous political and institutional changes that had occurred in the country over the past decade.
Explanation submitted by Party: the Party explained that the other CFCs at issue represented an increase in stocks held by the Party's producers.
The State party explained that the UNE, who had taken the decision, had considered the communication inadmissible on two grounds: the complainant's failure to exhaust domestic remedies, as well as the manifestly illfounded nature of the communication.
By note verbale of 18 August 2005, the State party explained that on 5 August 2005, the Dyatlov regional court decided to release the author early and conditionally.
The State party explained also that it intends including on this website all decisions in individual cases against Sweden decided by the United Nations' treaty bodies, starting as of 1 January 2011.
On 6 September 2011, the State party explained that Mr. Fardon had been released from custody in December 2006, under an extended supervision order.
The State party explained that the action was taken in order to improve the living conditions of the people concerned.
By note of 31 July 2001, the State party explained that the Office of the ProcuratorGeneral had examined the author's criminal case under the supervisory procedure.
The State party explained that it would keep the Committee informed of the outcome of the above-mentioned proceedings.
By note verbale of 28 December 2011, the State party explained that it had published the Committee's Views along with their Korean translation in the Government's Official Gazette 26 July 2011.
The State party explained that the handling of the present case does not follow the usual pattern described.
The State party explained that the Danish Immigration Service is competent of the issuance of the author's residence permit.
Later, the State party explained that all the death sentences of the alleged victims were commuted to 25 years' imprisonment.