Примеры использования Party provided information на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Party provided information to address the provisions of decision XV/19.
On 9 March 2005, the State party provided information on follow-up.
One Party provided information on the use of traditional technologies.
In a submission, dated 15 October 1997, the State party provided information in respect of case No. 512/1992 Pinto.
A Party provided information for all years in previous submissions and provided information on recalculations in the latest submissions.
Люди также переводят
By submission of 27 November 1997, the State party provided information in respect of case No. 434/1992 Seerattan.
Only one State party provided information on specific measures regarding supply of items or substances for analytical purposes and means or methods used to commit offences covered by the Convention.
In paragraphs 115 to 119 of the report, the State party provided information on actions taken to combat trafficking.
On 19 March 2010, the State party provided information in response to questions posed by the Secretariat on behalf of the Committee, in particular with respect to how six United Nations reports would bear upon the decision to deport the complainants from Sweden.
In paragraphs 115 to 119 of the report, the State party provided information on actions taken to combat trafficking.
The State party provided information concerning the asylum proceedings carried out by the Danish Immigration Service and the Refugee Appeals Board. On 23 August 2010, the complainant claimed that he was detained twice, once by the Taliban and once by the Afghan authorities.
In this regard,the Committee regrets that the State party did not provide requested data on the number of cases in which the State party provided information to civil authorities in the places where the cases arose and in the places where the priests concerned are currently located.
On 7 October 2004, the State party provided information on the events that led to the arrest of the author as well as on details of the preliminary investigation and the court proceedings.
On 2 August 2011, the State party provided information, prepared by different authorities.
It also notes that the State party provided information on the Overseas Departments and Territories, it however regrets that this information is presented in an annex and does not follow the general guidelines regarding the form and content of periodic reports CRC/C/58/Rev.1.
The Committee noted that the State party provided information about the author's husband's health almost two years after his initial detention.
The State party provided information that it had no further view, other than its observations communicated on 5 February 2013(see A/68/40).A reminder was sent to the State party on 17 July 2013, further to the transmittal of the authors' submission of 6 March 2013.
By submission of 14 January 1998, the State party provided information concerning the follow-up to the Committee's Views in respect of case No. 523/1992 Neptune.
In its initial report, the State party provided information on its judicial framework, but few details on violations of those rights, and it indicated that it had ratified both the Convention and the main international human rights treaties.
In submissions dated 25 November 1999 and8 January 2001, the State party provided information on domestic legislation and remedies for the protection of individuals against racial discrimination in the criminal, civil and administrative fields.
Regarding HCFC consumption, the party provided information on HCFC consumption trends for the period 2005- 2010 and data on HCFCs imported by companies, including HCFC blends.
By note verbale of 30 May 2002, the State party provided information on the judicial interpretation of parliamentary privilege and on the final decision of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in the Citron v. Zündel case.
The Committee appreciates that, in response to its previous concerns about insufficient disaggregated data,the State party provided information on the steps taken to improve the collection of data by the Office for Women and the development of indicators on gender equality, including data for indigenous people, people with disabilities and people from lower socio-economic and rural and remote backgrounds.
Ten States parties provided information on cases with some level of detail.
Forty-three Parties provided information on measures related to stockpiles and wastes.
Most Parties provided information on the focus and target groups of the training programmes.
The State party provides information concerning the legal background of the facts of the communication.
Most Parties provided information on possible adaptation measures and strategies in key sectors.
Four Parties provided information on the uncertainty of the estimates see box 1.
Several Parties provided information on their participation in many international research initiatives on climate.