Примеры использования Previous submissions на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The authors therefore reiterate their previous submissions.
He reiterates his previous submissions(see paras. 2.2- 2.4 above) and comments.
The authors therefore reiterate the comments in their previous submissions.
In addition to the case mentioned in our previous submissions, the Ombudsman was petitioned, for example.
A Includes start-up operational costs that were not included in previous submissions.
Accordingly, previous submissions of the United States contained such information, which continues to be relevant.
Inventory information could be briefly compared with previous submissions to detect potential anomalies.
On 19 June 2006, the State party commented on the author's observations and reiterated its previous submissions.
Previous submissions from Parties and relevant organizations on this matter and the synthesis report thereon;
On 4 August 2011, the State party reiterated in part its previous submissions, and provided additional observations.
During SBSTA 17, and in previous submissions, Parties presented a variety of views regarding the definition of baselines.
Further explanation of the amendments proposed by New Zealand can be found in previous submissions by New Zealand on these issues.
Previous submissions under the Nairobi work programme provided examples of the co-benefits of projects.
The State party relies, mutatis mutandis, on its previous submissions with respect to the first question posed by the Committee.
The State party does not consider in any case that the complainant is at risk of torture by the LTTE as mentioned in its previous submissions.
Relevant information contained in previous submissions from Parties and in national GHG inventory reports(FCCC/SBSTA/2005/INF.7);
For 2000-2001 through 2006-2007, biennial support budget figures are drawn from previous submissions to the Executive Board.
A Party provided information for all years in previous submissions and provided information on recalculations in the latest submissions. .
By submission dated 29 November 2010, the authors maintain that they have exhausted all domestic remedies,renewing the assertions made in their previous submissions.
All these barriers have been mentioned in previous submissions and workshop reports on adaptation planning and practices.
On 20 October 2011, the author's counsel noted that in its most recent submission, the State party in fact reiterated the information contained in its previous submissions.
The State party recalls the facts of the case in extenso,repeating its previous submissions on the admissibility and the merits of the communication.
He reiterates his previous submissions and adds that the facts provided by the State party are arbitrary and distorted despite the documentary evidence.
In a letter dated 28 June 2009, the authors referred to their previous submissions on the case, where all relevant issues had been fully addressed.
Lastly, the State party recalls that the author confirms in his comments that he had been granted release on bail,although he had avoided doing so in his previous submissions.
These approaches echo those highlighted in previous submissions and workshop reports on integrating adaptation into planning.
These applications were rejected for the reason that the circumstances invoked only constituted amendments or modifications to previous submissions in the complainants' asylum applications.
He notes that the State party ignored his previous submissions and refuses to allow an independent expert to take part in the medical forensic examinations.
These practices could also be expanded to, inter alia, cross-country comparisons of emission factors,comparisons with previous submissions or reconstruction of a given inventory.
On 24 May 2011, the State party reiterated its previous submissions and pointed out that its national legal order is currently in line with international standards.