Примеры использования Previous submission на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Previous submission.
Adequate amounts provided in the previous submission.
Previous submission 1 January 1999-31 December 1999.
On 2 August 2012, the author reiterated his previous submission.
In the column headed“Previous submission”, the number should read 1.
Люди также переводят
On 12 November 2012, the author reiterated his previous submission.
Updating its previous submission, Peru reported no compliance with article 53.
Software packages were not provided for in previous submission.
Updating its previous submission, Peru also reported partial compliance with article 9.
On 21 June 2012, Mr Torres Rodríguez reiterated his previous submission.
Updating its previous submission, the United Kingdom reported full implementation of the article under review.
On 25 April 2012, the State party reiterated its previous submission see paras 6.1- 6.4 above.
The formats of the previous submission have been expanded and updated for 1996 and 1997.
In these comments,the author largely reiterates the comments contained in his previous submission.
Updating its previous submission, Colombia provided examples of the successful implementation of the provisions under review.
Peru further provided an update of the applicable legislation cited in its previous submission.
As an update to its previous submission, the Philippines also reported full compliance with the article under review.
Furthermore, Peru provided an update of applicable legislation cited in its previous submission.
Croatia provided an update of its previous submission and reported full implementation of the provision under review.
On 11 July 2012, counsel inquired about the status of the case and reiterated its previous submission.
Croatia, updating its previous submission, reported full implementation of article 15 and quoted relevant legislation.
Compare recalculated inventory data between the latest and previous submission for the base and subsequent years;
Croatia reported full compliance with the requirements of article 9 andprovided an update of its previous submission.
The State party reiterated its previous submission, based on the existence of pending legal procedures on the author's case.
By its submission of 21 October 2005, the State party fully maintains its previous submission.
On 3 July 2012, counsel reiterated his previous submission and noted that the State party failed to give effect to the Committee's Views.
On 26 March 2003, the State party updated on its contacts with Mr. A. since its previous submission.
Updating its previous submission, the United Kingdom also stated that its legislation was fully compliant with the requirements of article 9.
By its submission of 21 October 2005,the State party firmly rejects the arguments put forward by the authors and maintains its previous submission.
Therefore, he reiterates his previous submission that because it was not regularly subjected to regular review, his detention was arbitrary.