Примеры использования Proxy regimes на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Representatives of the proxy regimes also participated in the working groups.
Unfortunately, no results were reached this time because of the rigid position of the representatives of the Russian Federation and its proxy regimes.
Currently, new agreements with proxy regimes are being prepared, inter alia in the field of military cooperation.
However, the prospects of these elements materializing remain minimal at this stage due to the negative position of Moscow and its proxy regimes.
Sadly, at this stage, the Russian Federation and its proxy regimes did not turn out to be ready to support those ideas.
Moscow and its proxy regimes once again tried to politicize the issue in order to block any opportunity of agreement.
Unfortunately, on this issue no consensus is yet possible owing to the highly unconstructive position of the Russian Federation and its proxy regimes.
Furthermore, Russia and the proxy regimes of Abkhazia and the Tskhinvali Region also boycotted the meetings of the working groups.
Unfortunately, on this issue consensus is not yet possible due to the highly unconstructive position of the Russian Federation and its proxy regimes.
Moscow and its proxy regimes declared that the idea of an international presence in the occupied territories was entirely unacceptable.
Any agreement concluded between an occupying country and its own proxy regimes is null and void from the standpoint of international law.
Moscow and its proxy regimes in Tskhinvali and Sokhumi continue to block the document of the Co-Chairs on the non-use of force and international security arrangements.
Under these agreements, Russia makes a commitment to provide both proxy regimes with assistance in securing and patrolling their borders with Georgia.
In this context, on 20 January 2008, Russia signed agreements of"Friendship, Cooperation and Mutual Assistance" with the proxy regimes of Sokhumi and Tshkinvali.
On 10 March 2012, Russian occupation forces and their proxy regimes held so-called"parliamentary elections" in the occupied region of Abkhazia.
Statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on the ratification of the agreements on"joint efforts for the protection ofthe so-called border" between Russia and the Sokhumi and Tskhinvali proxy regimes.
Irresponsible and criminal acts perpetrated by the Russian occupation troops and the proxy regimes are an important factor in causing instability.
Obviously, the Russian Federation and its proxy regimes continue to pursue their aggressive policy of destabilization designed to terrorize the local population.
The Head of the Provisional Administration of the former South Ossetian Autonomous District andthe representatives of the Sokhumi and Tskhinvali proxy regimes also took part in the twenty-third round of the discussions.
The crimes committed by the Russian occupants and their proxy regimes over the past 20 years have fundamentally distorted the demography of both the Abkhazia and Tskhinvali regions.
Several hundred thousands of the internally displaced persons are unable to return to their homes because of the inhuman policy of ethnic discrimination pursued by the Russian Federation and its proxy regimes in the occupied Tskhinvali region and Abkhazia.
In both working groups the Georgian side expressed concern that the proxy regimes continue to hamper the freedom of movement of the local residents.
Obviously, Russia and its proxy regimes did not agree with these findings of the Commission and attempted to highlight only the part of the report concerning the events of the night of 7/8 August.
The Georgian side maintains hope that a due assessment of the irresponsible behaviour of Moscow and its proxy regimes during the eleventh round of the Geneva talks will be provided by the international community.
Representatives of Moscow and the proxy regimes continued to question the fundamental right of the refugees and internally displaced persons to return to their homes in safety and dignity.
It is noteworthy that all the participants in the Geneva talks,except the representatives of the occupant power and its proxy regimes, share these positions and are interested in full implementation of the Ceasefire Agreement and in an increased international presence.
Moscow and its proxy regimes still refuse to discuss the safe, dignified and voluntary return of the internally displaced persons and refugees to the places of their original residence and fail to recognize the fundamental rights of internally displaced persons and refugees.
It is evident that the Russian occupiers and the proxy regimes under their control are continuing with their insolent and targeted provocative actions, keeping death numbers on the rise.
Acts committed by illegal gangs of the proxy regimes and the Russian occupation troops indicate clearly that the Russian Federation and the proxy regime under its control are far from intending to put in place the mechanisms under the aforementioned document and stabilizing the situation in the region.
It is alarming that,in the second working group, Moscow and its proxy regimes refused to discuss issues relating to the safe and dignified return of internally displaced persons and refugees.