Примеры использования Serious breaches of obligations на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Serious breaches of obligations under peremptory.
That reaffirmed the need to eliminate serious breaches of obligations under the Charter.
Serious breaches of obligations under peremptory norms.
An international organization may in fact have among its purposes that of bringing certain serious breaches of obligations under peremptory norms, for instance aggressions, to an end.
Serious breaches of obligations to the international community as a whole.
On the other hand, her delegation found much merit in other draft articles,such as those in Part Three, chapter III Serious breaches of obligations under peremptory norms of general international law.
Serious breaches of obligations to the international community as a whole": Part Two, Chapter III.
Support was expressed for draft article 49,which was regarded by some as necessary in the context of the provisions concerning serious breaches of obligations to the international community as a whole.
Chapter III-- Serious breaches of obligations under peremptory norms of general international law.
His delegation attached particular importance to chapter III of part two, containing articles 40 and41 and concerning serious breaches of obligations under peremptory norms of general international law.
The draft articles in chapter III(Serious breaches of obligations under peremptory norms of general international law) had been adopted as proposed on first reading.
The fourth positive element in the Commission's draft articles was the regime of specific responsibility for serious breaches of obligations under peremptory norms of general international law articles 40 and 41.
Serious breaches of obligations under peremptory norms of general international law give rise to additional consequences affecting not only the State bearing the responsibility, but also all other States.
Like internationally wrongful acts committed by States,infringements by international organizations may constitute serious breaches of obligations under peremptory norms of general international law.
Regarding serious breaches of obligations under peremptory norms of general international law, the Special Rapporteur recalled the comments made by States and international organizations in response to questions addressed by the Commission in its previous report.
The last chapter of Part Two of the draft articles, namely Chapter III,was composed of two draft articles relating to serious breaches of obligations under peremptory norms of general international law.
His delegation had noted the various points of view expressed regarding serious breaches of obligations to the international community as a whole, and agreed that chapter III of Part Two should be retained and that the clear emphasis should be on peremptory norms as reaffirmed in the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.
The draft articles had yet to satisfactorily address the concerns of a number of countries on very controversial issues such as"serious breaches of obligations under peremptory norms of general international law" and"countermeasures.
Recalling the two criteria that enabled serious breaches of obligations to be distinguished from other types of breaches(namely, the character of the obligation breached and the intensity of the breach), he emphasized the impreciseness of the wording proposed by the Commission in relation to the notions of peremptory norm of general international law and intensity of the breach. .
This is to be worded so as not to affect the obligations that members have with regard to serious breaches of obligations arising under a peremptory norm of general international law in accordance with chapter III.
The somewhat controversial article 49 providing for the invocation of responsibility by States other than the injured State is acceptable to the Nordic countries and indeed necessary,seen in the context of the provisions concerning serious breaches of obligations to the international community as a whole.
She expressed satisfaction that a clear differentiation was also made in the case of international organizations between the commission of a wrongful act and serious breaches of obligations under peremptory norms of international law.
The analysis will be divided into sections corresponding to the three chapters of Part Two of the articles on State responsibility:"general principles","reparation for injury" and"serious breaches of obligations under peremptory norms of general international law.
Draft articles 31 to 36 dealt with general principles of the content of international responsibility of an international organization; draft articles 37 to 42 related to reparation for injury and draft articles 43 and44 addressed the issue of serious breaches of obligations under peremptory norms of general international law.
Likewise, the inclusion of the requirement to comply with nationality rules, which is formulated in restrictive terms, manifestly contradicts draft articles 40 and 41, contained in Chapter III of the draft articles,which regulate serious breaches of obligations under peremptory norms of general international law.
Furthermore, the protest is generally addressed to a specific party andis confined to a specific issue, except in situations which may be defined as"breaches of international obligations having serious consequences for the international community as a whole" or"serious breaches of obligations under peremptory norms of general international law.
The new Part Two bis was also a clear improvement on the previous draft, and Chapter I in particular read well. The somewhat controversial article 49 providing for the invocation of responsibility by States other than the injured State was acceptable to the Nordic countries,which regarded it as necessary in the context of the provisions concerning serious breaches of obligations to the international community as a whole.
Thirdly, draft articles 44 and 45, which concerned the serious breach of obligations under peremptory norms of general international law, were incompatible with their counterparts in the articles on State responsibility.
It is essential to note that the crime committed in the town of Khojaly should be seen as a serious breach of obligations under peremptory norms(jus cogens) of general international law.
First, it identifies a positive obligation for States to cooperate to bring to an end through lawful means any serious breach of obligations under peremptory norms of general international law.