Примеры использования Special rapporteur's proposed на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
His delegation considered the Special Rapporteur's proposed articles 5 and 7 to be sound.
The Special Rapporteur's proposed definition of"territory" was comprehensive and in accordance with international law.
His delegation noted with interest the Special Rapporteur's proposed reformulation of draft article 16.
Ms. Weiss Ma'udi(Israel), referring to the topic"Identification of customary international law",said that her delegation welcomed the Special Rapporteur's proposed draft conclusions.
As to the duty to cooperate, the Special Rapporteur's proposed draft article 3 was too general to permit evaluation.
The first report of the Special Rapporteur, which was introductory in nature, aimed to provide a basis for future work and discussions on the topic, and set out in general terms the Special Rapporteur's proposed approach.
Accordingly, his delegation supported the Special Rapporteur's proposed revision to draft article 27, incorporating an intent requirement.
Nevertheless, it was possible to discern the principal elements of such a definition from articles 20 and21 thereof, and the Special Rapporteur's proposed definition in draft guideline 2.6.1 was entirely in line with those provisions.
The present report outlines the Special Rapporteur's proposed methodology and highlights the recent trends in the human rights situation in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Mr. Wan Jantan(Malaysia),speaking on the topic"Identification of customary international law", said that his delegation disagreed with the statement in the Special Rapporteur's proposed draft conclusion 7, paragraph 4, that the acts or inaction of an international organization might serve as practice.
As to the scope of the subject, while the Special Rapporteur's proposed final outcome of a providing a set of conclusions with commentaries emphasized practicality, the topic had both theoretical and practical aspects.
On the topic of international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law,his delegation supported the Special Rapporteur's proposed new text on the definition of harm, which included harm to the environment, an issue that was of particular importance to developing countries.
The definition of"disaster" in the Special Rapporteur's proposed draft article 2 was based on the definition used in the 1998 Tampere Convention on the Provision of Telecommunications Resources for Disaster Mitigation and Relief Operations.
Reports and in paragraph 109 supra, the Special Rapporteur's proposed draft articles for Part Three, as submitted in 1993 A/CN.4/453/Add.1 and Corr.1 to 3.
Conversely, the Special Rapporteur's proposed reformulation of article 35 was also supported, provided that its invocation was without prejudice to the cessation of any act not in conformity with the obligation and the subsequent compliance with it when and to the extent that the circumstance precluding wrongfulness no longer existed.
The article had been generally welcomed, although the Special Rapporteur's proposed deletion of the element of"systematic or massive violation" from the definition had given rise to disagreement in the Commission.
Concerning the Special Rapporteur's proposed draft conclusion 6, the Nordic countries agreed that the general standard for the determination of State practice should be whether or not an act was attributable to the State in question and that the standard for attribution should be the same as under the rules of State responsibility.
While there had been some support for the Special Rapporteur's proposed text, the provision was problematic, particularly as it had become largely redundant in the light of draft article 3.
Mr. Cardoso(Brazil) welcomed the Special Rapporteur's proposed approach, imbued with a spirit of dialogue and cooperation, similar to the approach of Brazil in the field of human rights, which would make a positive contribution to strengthening respect for the independence of judges and lawyers worldwide.
The preliminary report set out in general terms the Special Rapporteur's proposed approach to the topic and provided, inter alia, an overview of the scope and methodology, as well as of the previous work of the Commission relevant to the topic.
Her delegation endorsed the Special Rapporteur's proposed definition, which included the concepts of incitement and attempt, thus bringing it closer to that provided under the Convention on genocide and that used in the statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and the Statute of the International Tribunal for Rwanda.
Other representatives said they could neither agree to the deletion of article 7 nor support the Special Rapporteur's proposed reformulation of the article, the effect of which was, in the words of one of those representatives, to exempt States, when using an international watercourse in an equitable and reasonable manner, from the obligation not to cause significant harm to other watercourse States, except in cases of pollution.
Although the Special Rapporteur's proposed draft guideline 3.4.2 did not resolve the question of the effects that such objections might produce, it would be useful to emphasize that a State should not be able to take advantage of an objection to a reservation which it had formulated outside the allowable time period for formulating reservations to modify other provisions of the treaty which bore little or no relation to the provisions to which the reservation applied.
His delegation agreed with the Special Rapporteur's proposed definition of unilateral acts insofar as it included specific reference to the"unequivocal expression of will… by a State" and the"intention" of the author to"produce legal effects.
In response to paragraph 212 of the ILC report on the Special Rapporteur's proposed text for articles 44 and 45(corresponding to current articles 37 and 38), the Netherlands would observe that the phrase"gravity of the injury" can apply equally to the gravity of the wrongful act and the gravity of the damage incurred.
His delegation supported the Special Rapporteur's proposed timetable and methodology for consideration of the topic and agreed with the need to study the specific nature of the formation and evidence of customary rules based on traditional approaches to the topic, which stressed the significance of both State practice and opinio juris.
Regarding the Special Rapporteur's proposed draft article A(Elaboration of the duty to cooperate), her delegation agreed with those Commission members who had expressed the view that the use of mandatory language-- the word"shall"-- indicated the existence of an obligation to provide assistance-- an assertion found not to be supported by State practice.
In contrast, the Special Rapporteur's proposed reformulation of article 16 was described as not entirely satisfactory because it encompassed at least two different questions previously dealt with in articles 16, 17(2) and 19(1); combined several important provisions which deserved to be dealt with separately; and involved renumbering, which was best avoided.
It was suggested that the Drafting Committee's changes in the Special Rapporteur's proposed text should be examined carefully given their far-reaching effects and potential for abuse, namely: the article's scope of application was broadened since the criterion of"essential interest" in paragraph 1(a) was no longer limited by the reference to the State and"the international community as a whole" was referred to in paragraph 1(b) to take into account obligations erga omnes.
It was also unclear how the text of the Special Rapporteur's proposed draft guideline 2, subparagraph(b), according to which the draft guidelines referred to the basic principles relating to the protection of the atmosphere, related to the Commission's understanding that, inter alia, the topic would not deal with questions such as liability of States and their nationals, the polluter-pays principle, the precautionary principle, common but differentiated responsibilities, and the transfer of funds and technology to developing countries, including intellectual property rights.