Примеры использования The claimed amounts на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The claimed amounts are summarised in table 40, infra.
In its reply to the article 15 notification, Anice increased the claimed amounts for"office expenditure- India" and interest.
The claimed amounts are set out in table 31, infra.
The claimed amounts would appear to be a combination of contract losses and tangible property losses.
Kyudenko also provided various untranslated documents and a packing list,none of which can be reconciled with the claimed amounts.
The claimed amounts totaled 552.4 million rubles under the first lawsuit and 68.3 million rubles under the second lawsuit.
This loss was then reportedly priced at the market value of the particular crop to arrive at the claimed amounts.
As such, the claimed amounts may vary in currency or by 1 KWD from the amount stated on the claim form.
Although the claimed amounts and alleged losses for the three claims were almost identical,the two panels differed in their recommendations concerning their claims. .
It asserts that"[n]othing has been provided to support that the claimed amounts of compensation have a direct causal relationship with the Gulf events.
With regard to retention monies, Bangladesh Consortium did notprovide confirmation from the employers in respect to the retention monies, and the evidence provided does not substantiate the claimed amounts.
Montgomery states that it has no payroll records andno evidence to show that the claimed amounts were actually received by the employees.
In addition, Wood Group has provided the balance sheet with respect to the maintenance contract for the three-month period ended 30 June 1990, which contains an entry, denominated“fixed assets”,which adds up to the claimed amounts.
In its reply to the article 15 notification,Wayss& Freytag claimed additional interest and increased the claimed amounts for both the contract losses and the"Subsidiary Motion.
However, all of the invoices provided by Shimizu in support of this loss item are payable by Mitsubishi Corporation, and not by Shimizu. Shimizu did not explain the relevance of the referenceto Mitsubishi Corporation and did not provide evidence that it paid the claimed amounts.
In its response to the article 34 notification, CMI simply repeated its assertion that neither BUTEC northe Employer had paid the claimed amounts and that it had not received any compensation for the claimed amounts from any other source.
Due to a clerical error, the secretariat failed to bring to the attention of the Panel certain items of evidence that had been submitted by the claimant to demonstrate that it had paid the claimed amounts to its employees.
With regard to the claim for salaries and benefits paid to the employees taken hostage,the Panel finds that there is no evidence to show that the claimed amounts were received by the employees, or to reconcile the payment of GBP 1,660 for evacuation costs reflected in the correspondence with the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
However, all of the invoices provided by Shimizu in support of this loss item are payable by Mitsubishi Corporation, and not by Shimizu.Shimizu did not explain the relevance of the reference to Mitsubishi Corporation and did not provide evidence that it paid the claimed amounts.
Although Maksoud reduced the total claimed amount for loss of tangible property,it purported to increase the claimed amounts for contract losses and interest.
With regard to the claim by the Iranian Civil Aviation Authority for airline industry losses,the claimant did not provide evidence to support the claimed amounts in relation to any of the loss elements claimed. .
In addition to these 12 claims, the Panel has also sent a number of claims that were deferred from previous instalments to Iraq for its comments on the basis that the claimed amounts exceeded USD 10 million or the situs of the alleged losses was Iraq.
In addition to these claims, the Panel also senttransmitted a number ofsix claim files that were deferred from previous instalments toIraq for its comments, on the basis that the claimed amounts exceed USD 10 million or the situs of the alleged losses was Iraq.
Som Datt seeks compensation in the amount of US$11,617,618(modified from the original claim for US$50,793,501) for interest due from 30 June 1990 to 31 December 1998 on unpaid amounts certified under the Hilla and Mosul Project contracts.Som Datt stated that the claimed amounts were payable under a deferred payment arrangement entered into in respect of the Hilla and Mosul Projects.
However, according to Chiyoda, SCOP should have subsequently released the retention monies because it was obliged to do so under Supplementary Agreement No. 2. Chiyoda states that it wrote to SCOP requesting release of the retention monies on 30 July 1986. Chiyoda further states that SCOP, by a letter dated 3 August 1986,acknowledged that it had retained the claimed amounts and requested Chiyoda to submit no objection certificates from the relevant government authorities prior to release of the claimed amounts. .
The claim amounts as considered by the Panel are set out in table 10, infra.
The claimed amount is comprised of the following costs.
Furthermore, the claimed amount would not be compensable even if proved.