Примеры использования To conditional interpretative declarations на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Draft guideline 2.9.10 Reactions to conditional interpretative declarations.
With regard to conditional interpretative declarations, it was pointed out that they were nothing more than a particular category of reservations.
The situation is different with regard to conditional interpretative declarations.
With regard to conditional interpretative declarations in principle a State could not be denied the right to formulate a declaration of that kind.
Last, draft guideline 2.9.10 dealt with reactions to conditional interpretative declarations.
No special provision concerning alternatives to conditional interpretative declarations appears to be necessary: the alternative procedures listed above are treaty-based and require only the agreement of the contracting parties.
He also suggested that draft guideline 1.3 should apply only to conditional interpretative declarations.
Reactions to conditional interpretative declarations were thus more akin to acceptances of or objections to a reservation than to reactions to a simple interpretative declaration. .
The provisions of guidelines 3.2 to 3.2.4 apply, mutatis mutandis, to conditional interpretative declarations.
With regard to draft guideline 2.9.10, on reactions to conditional interpretative declarations, his delegation shared the view that such declarations were different from simple interpretative declarations. .
She was in favour of deleting draft guideline 2.9.10 on reactions to conditional interpretative declarations.
Draft guideline 1.3.1 would then apply only to conditional interpretative declarations, and the commentary to it would point to the inadvisability of distinguishing between simple interpretative declarations and reservations.
In the meantime, the Special Rapporteur will continue to pose questions concerning the rules applying to conditional interpretative declarations.
It might be unwise to align the regime applicable to conditional interpretative declarations too closely with that of reservations.
There was a view, however,that the time period for reactions to reservations should not be applicable to conditional interpretative declarations.
Support was expressed for draft guideline 2.9.10, subjecting reactions to conditional interpretative declarations to the same guidelines as those governing reactions to reservations.
His delegation wondered, moreover,whether draft guideline 2.1.8 should not apply, mutatis mutandis, to conditional interpretative declarations.
With regard to conditional interpretative declarations, the Nordic countries agreed with the notion contained in draft guideline 1.2.1 that they did,to a large extent, resemble reservations and therefore often had to be treated as such.
We took note that the Commission's report still mentions draft guideline 2.9.10(Reactions to conditional interpretative declarations) within brackets.
It is thus appropriate to transpose to conditional interpretative declarations the rules governing the formal confirmation of reservations formulated when signing(draft guideline 2.2.1) or when negotiating, adopting or authenticating the text of the treaty draft guideline 2.2.2.
Guidelines 2.6 to 2.8.12 shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to reactions of States andinternational organizations to conditional interpretative declarations.
According to the same view, the procedure of draft guideline 2.1.8 might apply, mutatis mutandis, to conditional interpretative declarations in cases where the interpretation of treaty contained in such declaration was manifestly unfounded.
Observation 2001 It would be preferable to simplify the procedure by making it clear that the"guidelines" in relation to reservations would apply,mutatis mutandis, to conditional interpretative declarations.
For that reason, the Guide to Practice should not perhaps include draft guidelines specifically relating to conditional interpretative declarations, since such declarations were rightly included within the concept of reservations.
Draft guideline 3.5.3, which had also been put forward provisionally,stated that the draft guidelines relating to competence to assess the"validity" of reservations were applicable, mutatis mutandis, to conditional interpretative declarations.
It does not appear necessary to devote a separate guideline to the enumeration of alternatives to conditional interpretative declarations: the alternative procedures listed above are treaty-based and require the agreement of the contracting States and contracting organizations.
However, the guideline appeared in brackets for the time being, pending a decision by the Commission as to the treatment to be given to conditional interpretative declarations in the Guide to Practice.
In the case of simple interpretative declarations(as opposed to conditional interpretative declarations), there is no rule comparable to that contained in article 20, paragraph 5, of the Vienna Conventions(the principle of which is reflected in guideline 2.8.1), so these concerns do not arise.
Guideline 2.9.10 provided that the guidelines applicable to reactions to reservations should apply, mutatis mutandis,to reactions to conditional interpretative declarations.
If, mutatis mutandis, an identical regime applies to both, there would still be time to delete specific guidelines relating to conditional interpretative declarations andadopt a single guideline assimilating the legal regime applicable to conditional interpretative declarations to that of reservations.