Примеры использования To defer consideration of this question на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Committee decided to defer consideration of this question to a later date.
By its decision 1997/111,4 the Commission on Human Rights, bearing in mind its resolution 1996/44 on the United Nations Decade for Human Rights Education and the need to allow time for the implementation of the resolution,decided to defer consideration of this question to its fifty-fourth session.
The Committee then decided to defer consideration of this question to a later meeting.
In its decision 1997/118, the Commission, bearing in mind its resolution 1996/19, entitled“Tolerance and pluralism as indivisible elements in the promotion and protection of human rights”, and the need to allow time for the implementation of the resolution,decided to defer consideration of this question to its fifty-fourth session under the relevant agenda item.
At that session, the Assembly decided to defer consideration of this question to its forty-ninth session.
Decides to defer consideration of this question to the second part of its resumed fifty-eighth session and requests the Secretary-General to provide a comprehensive report, taking into account the views expressed, questions raised and information requested by Member States at its fifty-seventh session, including a simulation of the options proposed.
On the proposal of the Chairman, the Committee decided to defer consideration of this question to its first resumed session.
At the same resumed session, the General Assembly decided to defer consideration of this question to the second part of its resumed fifty-eighth session and requested the Secretary-General to provide a comprehensive report, taking into account the views expressed, questions raised and information requested by Member States at its fifty-seventh session, including a simulation of the options proposed resolution 57/319.
Although there was no opposition to including a reference to the Code in the ADR as proposed in paragraph 5 of document ECE/TRANS/WP.15/2014/7,the Working Party decided to defer consideration of this question pending formal endorsement of the Code by the IMO Maritime Safety Committee and the ILO Governing body in May and in October-November 2014 respectively.
The Committee decided, without a vote, to defer consideration of this question until the second part of the resumed fifty-second session.
On the proposal of the Chairman, the Committee decided, without a vote, to defer consideration of this question to the third part of its resumed fifty-second session.
Subsequently, the General Assembly decided to defer consideration of this question to the resumed fifty-third session.
The Council, at its substantive session of 2000, decided to defer consideration of this question(agenda item 8)to its resumed substantive session of 2000.
In its decision 1997/111, the Commission decided to defer consideration of this question to its fifty-fourth session under the relevant agenda item.
By decision 52/484 of 26 June 1998, the General Assembly decided to defer consideration of this question to the third part of its resumed fifty-second session.
On the proposal of the Chairman, the Committee decided, without a vote, to defer consideration of this question pending a report by the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions.
On the proposal of the Chairman, the Committee agreed that the Secretariat prepare a draft decision for the consideration of the Committee by which the Committee would recommend to the General Assembly that it defer consideration of this question to the main part of its fifty-sixth session.
At its 2000 resumed session, the Committee decided to defer consideration of this organization, placed in the Roster by virtue of its consultative status with UNESCO, pending the outcome of the debate of the Committee on the question of granting consultative status with the Economic and Social Council to non-governmental organizations placed in the Roster by virtue of their consultative status with other United Nations bodies such as the specialized agencies.
At its 675th meeting, the Committee decided to defer consideration of this organization's application to its 1999 session, pending clarification of its response to questions posed to the organization by the Committee.
The General Assembly in its resolution 57/319 of 18 June 2003 decided to defer consideration of this matter until the second part of its fifty-eighth session and requested the Secretary-General to provide a comprehensive report, taking into account the views expressed, questions raised and information requested by Member States at its fifty-seventh session, including a simulation of the options proposed.
The representative of the United States asked to defer consideration of this proposal to the following session to allow the organization to respond to the questions posed by members of the Committee and to receive a response from the Secretariat of the Commission on Human Rights on the request to investigate whether the United Nations Security Services in Geneva had allowed the organization to bring the device into the conference room of the Commission.
At its 58th meeting, on 31 March, having heard a statement by the representative of Cuba, Vice-Chairman of the Committee and coordinator of informal consultations on this question, andon the proposal of the Chairman, the Committee decided, without a vote, to recommend to the General Assembly that it defer consideration of this question until its fifty-fifth session see para. 6.
Accordingly, the Committee decided to defer further consideration of this question to its sixty-third session, in 2003, which would also conform to the normal quinquennial review cycle.
As recalled in paragraph 3 of the Secretary-General's report(A/C.5/47/39), the General Assembly, by its resolution 46/185 Aof 20 December 1991, concurred in the Advisory Committee's recommendation and decided to defer until its forty-seventh session consideration of this question.
At its 58th meeting, on 31 March 2000, following a statement by the representative of India andcoordinator of informal consultations on this question, and on the proposal of the Chairman, the Committee decided, without a vote, to recommend to the General Assembly that it defer consideration of this item to the second part of its resumed fifty-fourth session see para. 5.
The Committee decided to defer consideration of the proposed programme budget for the biennium 1998-1999 to a resumed session, to be held after it received the revised proposals relating to conference services of the proposed programme budget. The report of the Committee on this question will be issued as an addendum to the present report.
Agreeing that in any event the description should be sufficiently precise to elicit offers that responded to needs of procuring entity, but that the requirement for specifications needed for tendering would still not be met,the Working Group deferred its final consideration of this question;
In paragraph 34 of the report of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions(A/49/7/Add.12), the Advisory Committee deferred consideration of this proposal, as the post classification exercise had yet to be completed.
Decided to defer consideration of chapter IV(Review of the list of least developed countries), including the question of graduating Cape Verde and Maldives, to its resumed session, and in this regard requested the Secretary-General to provide the necessary technical support to the Council for that purpose.
At its 2000 resumed session, the Committee decided to defer consideration of the request for reclassification contained in the application of this organization pending response from the organization to questions raised by the Committee E/C.2/2000/R.3/Add.2.