Примеры использования To enter into treaty на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Except where a specific reservation is expresslyauthorized by a treaty, the other contracting parties are always free to reject it and even to enter into treaty relations with its author.
Nevertheless, in some cases, an objecting State had chosen to enter into treaty relations despite the fact that the reservations made were of a very broad, extremely general and imprecise nature.
In some cases, the objecting State had decided, despite the fact that the reservations made were of a very broad andimprecise nature, to enter into treaty relations with the reserving State.
The premise was that, on balance,it was more attractive for the objecting State to enter into treaty relations, albeit limited, with the reserving State than not to enter into treaty relations at all.
Except where a specific reservation is expressly authorized by a treaty, the other States and organizations are always free to reject it forany reason whatsoever and even not to enter into treaty relations with its author.
Люди также переводят
Consequently, the premise was that, on balance,it was more attractive for the objecting State to enter into treaty relations, albeit limited, with the reserving State than not to enter into treaty relations at all.
By refusing to enter into treaty relations with one of the States parties to the constituent instrument of IFAD, Saudi Arabia is indeed seeking to exclude or to modify the legal effect[of certain provisions] of the treaty in their application to it.
They argued that Indian peoples did in fact have rights to the land, and some went one step further by addressing, in the context of the laws of war,the rights and capacity of Indian nations and peoples to enter into treaty relations although they were“strangers to the true religion”.
There was also an intermediate effect,where a State wished to enter into treaty relations with the author of the reservation while at the same time considering that the effect of the objection should go beyond what was provided in article 21, paragraph 3, of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. .
They argued that Indian peoples did in fact have rights to the land, and some went one step further by addressing, in the context of the laws of war, the rights andcapacity of Indian nations and peoples to enter into treaty relations although they were“strangers to the true religion”.
As the United Kingdom pointed out in its observations on General Comment No. 24,"there is a clear distinction between choosing not to enter into treaty obligations and trying to opt out of customary international law". Commentary(footnote 87 above), para. 7, p. 154. However, one may well question what real motives a State might have for doing so.
His delegation questioned, however, whether the proposed definition fully encompassed all the intentions with which States formulated objections: it focused too much on the contractual aspect of objections while neglecting the policy aspect, as expressed in contemporary practice, under which objections did not preclude the entry into force of a treaty between the reserving andthe objecting State unless the latter explicitly expressed a wish not to enter into treaty relations with the reserving State.
He asked whether it was the Canadian Government's policy that aboriginal peoples should abandon their rights to land and resources in order to enter into treaty arrangements, since even new treaties contained an extinguishment clause or a conversion clause.
Have in fact done the same thing: they challenge a right conferred by the Convention on the administrating Powers andmake it clear that they are not ready to enter into treaty relations with them if the exercise of that right is claimed, it being for them to raise an objection if they do not mean to forgo it.
However, there is in practice an intermediate stage between the"minimum" and"maximum" effects of the objection, as envisaged by this provision,since there are situations in which a State wishes to enter into treaty relations with the author of the reservation while at the same time considering that the effect of the objection should go beyond what is provided for in article 21, paragraph 3.
Louis XIV refused to enter into treaties with Prince Rákóczi, leaving the Hungarians without allies.
States had a sovereign right to enter into treaties and make reservations that were consistent with the terms of the treaty. .
The executive arm of Government,which is constitutionally mandated to enter into treaties, does not have legislative powers, it is therefore important that the legislature endorses the treaty. .
Paragraph 1 of article 8 reflects the basic proposition that an armed conflict does not affect the capacity of a State party to that conflict to enter into treaties.
If the second footnote were to be adopted, she proposed that a reference to"any territory authorized by a State to enter into treaties" should be added thereto.
Moreover, most constitutions were silent on the domestic requirements for a unilateral assumption of legal obligations, in contrast to the full regulation given to the competence to enter into treaties.
All responding States confirmed their interest in and commitment to entering into treaties, both bilateral and multilateral, which establish an obligation aut dedere aut judicare.
States had the sovereign right freely to enter into treaties and to make reservations that were consistent with them; if a reservation was invalid, however, and that invalidity had been brought to the State's attention, then it could not rely upon the reservation in its conduct.
These criticisms concern paragraph 1 of draft article 6, which, as stated in paragraph(2) of the commentary to the draft article,enunciates the"basic proposition" that an armed conflict does not affect the capacity of States parties to the conflict to enter into treaties.
Upon signature, a regional economic integration organization shall make a declaration specifying the matters governed by the Protocol in respect of which competence has been transferred to that organization by its member States, the nature and extent of that competence,including the competence to enter into treaties in respect of these matters.
According to article 17 of the Aarhus Convention it was open for signature by, inter alia,"regional economic integration organizations constituted by sovereign States members of the Economic Commission for Europe to which their member States have transferred competence over matters governed by this Convention,including the competence to enter into treaties in respect of these matters.
In other cases, sovereign States authorize their sub-State components to enter into treaties directly and in their own name.
If they lack such capacity, what are the implications for the extent to which it is desirable for them to enter into treaties?
For the sake of editorial convenience, the term“State”, as used in this Handbook,may include other entities competent at international law to enter into treaties.
Moreover, most constitutions were silent on the domestic requirements for unilateral assumption of legal obligations, in contrast to the full regulation given to competence to enter into treaties.