Примеры использования To settle their international на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Council underlines the obligation of all Member States to seek to settle their international disputes by peaceful means.
It was the obligation of States to settle their international disputes by peaceful means of their choice and with due regard for the relevant General Assembly resolutions.
That principle was particularly important for States Members of the United Nations, as they were ipso facto parties to the Court's Statute and,by virtue of their obligations under the Charter of the United Nations, had undertaken to settle their international disputes peacefully.
Likewise, they deemed it imperative for all States to settle their international disputes by peaceful means in accordance with the Charter.
Recalling the obligations of all States under Article 2 of the Charter to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity orpolitical independence of any State, and to settle their international disputes by peaceful means.
Member States had both a duty, under Article 2,paragraph 3, of the Charter, to settle their international disputes by peaceful means and the right to choose the means of dispute settlement.
Recalling the obligations of all States under Article 2 of the Charter to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity orpolitical independence of any State, and to settle their international disputes by peaceful means.
Recalling also the duty of States under the Charter to settle their international disputes by peaceful means in order not to endanger international peace, security and justice.
Reaffirms the duty of all States to find peaceful means by which to settle any dispute to which they are parties before such dispute is likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security, andencourages States to settle their international disputes as early as possible;
Reaffirming the obligation of all States to settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace, security and justice are not endangered.
On the topic of peaceful settlement of disputes, he would simply stress that under Article 2,paragraph 3, of the Charter Member States had assumed the obligation to settle their international disputes by peaceful means, while retaining the right to choose among the means specified in Article 33.
Reaffirming the obligation of all States to settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice are not endangered.
Recalling the obligation of all States under Article 2 of the United Nations Charter to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity orpolitical independence of any state, and to settle their international disputes by peaceful means.
In accordance with the Charter, Member States undertook to settle their international disputes by peaceful means and to refrain in international relations from the threat or use of force.
All Member States are required to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, orin any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations, and to settle their international disputes by peaceful means Art. 2.
Reaffirms the duty of all States to settle their international disputes by peaceful means, inter alia through negotiation, enquiry, good offices, mediation, conciliation, arbitration and judicial settlement, or other peaceful means of their own choice;
According to Article 2, paragraph 3, of the United Nations Charter,all Members of the United Nations are to settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered.
Reaffirming the obligations of all Member States to settle their international disputes by peaceful means and stressing the primary responsibility of the Security Council for the maintenance of international peace and security in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
During the general exchange of views, delegations recalled the duty of members of the United Nations, under Article 2,paragraph 3, of the Charter to settle their international disputes by peaceful means and underlined the duty of parties to a dispute to seek a peaceful solution at an early stage, by means set out in Article 33 of the Charter.
The Council reaffirms the responsibility of all Member States to settle their international disputes by peaceful means and its own primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
That was the first case in which those two States came to settle their dispute before the International Court of Justice.
Attaching great importance to the principle that States shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means.
Emphasizing the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, which stipulate that all Member States are committed to refrain from the use orthe threat of use of force in their international relations and to settle their disputes by peaceful means.
Reaffirms the duty of all States, in accordance with the principles of the Charter of the United Nations,to use peaceful means to settle any dispute to which they are parties before such dispute is likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security, and encourages States to settle their disputes as early as possible;
We urge the parties to the Middle East conflict to honour road map commitments and to settle their differences in accordance with the international agreements and the Arab peace initiative.
It urges the two parties to focus on dialogue as a means to settle their disputes or, where necessary, to appeal to international courts.
Urging and expecting all Member States currently in arrears to fulfil their duties under international law and to settle those arrears promptly and in full.
The willingness of Member States to allow them to settle in their territory would be an important signal of commitment to international justice and to the rule of law.
In a context of extreme poverty andmassive youth unemployment, it is extremely difficult for many displaced persons to settle locally or to reintegrate in their place of origin without the international community's support.
In the view of Brazil,it was not necessary to refer to the notion of crimes having their basis in customary international law in order to settle a problem of jurisdiction.