Примеры использования Were declared inadmissible на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Both were declared inadmissible.
Approximately 116 applications were declared inadmissible.
Eight of them were declared inadmissible by the European Convention bodies.
In addition, approximately 50 applications were declared inadmissible.
In 2004, the Commission received 68 complaints, 12 of which were declared inadmissible, 33 were brought to a conclusion and 23 remained outstanding and were carried over to the following year.
The cases of the disappearance of two Turkish Cypriots were declared inadmissible in 2002.
Some other communications or specific claims were declared inadmissible for failure to exhaust domestic remedies, including in cases Nos. 1960/2010(Ory v. France) and 2104/2011 Valetov v. Kazakhstan.
Of those, 1 complaint was discontinued and 18 were declared inadmissible.
Given that all these communications were declared inadmissible on grounds other than the extraterritorial applicability of the Convention, the Committee's position on this issue is yet to be publicly stated.
For 1997-1998, of the 107 complaints registered, 47 were declared inadmissible and 39 were successful.
The State party recalls that the author had submitted three complaints to the European Commission, all of which were declared inadmissible.
Three communications were declared inadmissible;
If so, the detainees were immediately examined by a police doctor and, if it was shown that they had been tortured,any confessions they had made were declared inadmissible as evidence.
Six of the complaints were declared inadmissible.
During the period under consideration, 23 petitions were lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights against Switzerland for violation of article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Twenty of them were declared inadmissible by the Commission.
At the same time, three communications were declared inadmissible and six were removed from the roll.
In this connection, it draws attention to communications submitted to the Committee containing complaints against Chile that were declared inadmissible ratione temporis.
In 2005-2006, of a total of 222 complaints, 45 were declared inadmissible, 90 were brought to a conclusion and 87 remained outstanding.
B/ Compare decisions in cases No. 17/1994(X v. Switzerland) andNo. 18/1994(X v. Switzerland), which were declared inadmissible on 17 November 1994.
For the period 19971998, of the 107 complaints received, 47 were declared inadmissible, 39 had a successful conclusion, 15 are still being examined and 6 were declared unfounded.
As to whether the European Commission"examined" the same matter, the Committee observes that most of the author's claims under article 14, with the exception of that under article 14,paragraph 3(e), were declared inadmissible as manifestly ill-founded.
Both administrative andjudicial conciliations were declared inadmissible under the new law see annex 7.
Most claims were declared inadmissible because they were manifestly ill-founded, others were declared inadmissible because they were incompatible ratione materiae with the European Convention of Human Rights.
In 2006, 2.280 new applications were lodged against Turkey, and3.166 applications were declared inadmissible or struck off by the Court.
Of the 208 complaints registered in the first year, 38 were declared inadmissible, 78 resulted in compensation or the release of persons who had been wrongfully detained, and 30 were referred to the competent courts.
The claims based on the violation of article 3 of the Protocol, articles 1, 13 and14 of the Convention were declared inadmissible on the grounds that they were manifestly illfounded.
A reference to cases that were declared inadmissible or where no violation was found could perhaps be inserted elsewhere, but the emphasis in paragraph 20 was on the legal quality of the Committee's views and its consistent jurisprudence.
In the period covered by the present report, other claims were declared inadmissible for failure to pursue available and effective remedies.
With regard to the two claims which were declared inadmissible as incompatible ratione materiae with the Convention, the State party notes that the Court in fact examined these claims in detail, reaching the conclusion that the author has used arguments referring not to the direct behaviour of the judicial court, but of the public prosecutor or the Panel evaluating the admissibility to trial of the former Minister, to imply lack of independence and impartiality of national tribunals.
In the period covered by the present report, certain claims were declared inadmissible for failure to pursue available and/or effective remedies.