Примери за използване на Be rebutted на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
It can't be rebutted.".
An assumption of unlawfulness by virtue of form cannot be rebutted.
Presumptions can generally be rebutted by the opposing party.
In that regard, the Commission points out that the presumption that each Member State respects the fundamental rights of applicants, on which Regulation No 604/2013 is based,can be rebutted only in quite exceptional situations.
All these facts may be rebutted with the proposal of evidence.
The law makes certain presumptions which may be rebutted by evidence.
Such presumptions may be rebutted in accordance with the ordinary procedure.
B The presumption that the fair value of investment property under construction can be measured reliably can be rebutted only on initial recognition.
A legal presumption may be rebutted by evidence to the contrary, unless otherwise provided for by law.
The Commission accepts that the presumption of the actual exercise of decisive influence may be rebutted by evidence which shows that the subsidiary acted independently.
Legal presumptions may be rebutted by the presentation of counter-proof, except in cases where the law does not allow this.
I suppose Sandy's headstone could be considered the lastword in the matter, a final show-up that could not be rebutted, because, after all, Kathy was already dead.
That presumption could, however, be rebutted if the person establishes that he or she did not use the inside information when carrying out the transaction.
However, it is also clear from the order for reference that the national legislation at issue in the main proceedings provides that that presumption may be rebutted if persons other than the owner of the internet connection might have had access to that connection.
However, this presumption may be rebutted where disclosure is shown to be necessary to protect a party's rights.
Authentic documents(that is, those set down in writing by a competent public authority or official in the exercise of their powers) are considered to fully prove the facts they refer to as having been carried out by such agents together with the facts which are attested to in them on the basis of the understanding of the documenting entity(that is, such documents represent a demonstration of proof which can only be rebutted by proof to the contrary).
The presumption in paragraph 30 can be rebutted only on initial recognition.
(28) This presumption may, however, be rebutted in exceptional cases, in particular where it is quite obvious that the interpretation which is sought of the provisions of European Union law referred to in the questions is hypothetical.
Should the presumption referred to in paragraph 1 not be rebutted, the competent authorities shall expel the third-country national from the territories of the Member States concerned.'.
However, that presumption can be rebutted only on initial recognition for a biological asset for which quoted market prices are not available and for which alternative fair value measurements are determined to be clearly unreliable.
Should the presumption referred to in paragraph 1 not be rebutted, the third-country national may be expelled by the competent authorities from the territory of the Member States concerned.
However, that presumption can be rebutted only on initial recognition for a biological asset for which quoted market prices are not available and for which alternative fair value measurements are determined to be clearly unreliable.
It considered that the presumption that the Member States respect the fundamental rights of applicants may be rebutted not only when there are, in the Member State responsible, systemic flaws within the meaning of the second subparagraph of Article 3(2) of Regulation No 604/2013, but also when the Member State responsible does not comply with its obligations under Article 3 ECHR or Article 33(1) of the Geneva Convention.
Should the presumption referred to in paragraph 1 not be rebutted, the third-country national may be returned in accordance with Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals(22) and with national law respecting that Directive.
Should the presumption referred to in paragraph 1 not be rebutted, the third-country national may be returned in accordance with Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council[28] and with national law respecting that Directive.
Unfortunately, the Amendment Act does not provide a standard of proof as to when the presumption is rebutted.
It goes on to state that, for determining whether that presumption is rebutted,‘the source of the risk' is irrelevant.
Accordingly, unless the presumption is rebutted, the measurement of the deferred tax liability or the deferred tax asset shall reflect the tax consequences of recovering the carrying amount of the investment property entirely through sale.
This presumption is rebutted if the investment property is depreciable and is held within a business model whose objective is to consume substantially all of the economic benefits embodied in the investment property over time, instead of through sale.
In that case Article 12 of Regulation(EU)2016/399 shall apply and if that presumption is rebutted in accordance with Article 12(3) of that Regulation, the competent authorities shall create an individual file for that third country national in the EES if necessary, or update the latest entry/exit record by entering the missing data in accordance with Articles 14 and 15 or delete an existing file where Article 32 applies.