Exemple de utilizare a Directive's scope în Engleză și traducerile lor în Română
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
There is, secondly,a question of the Directive's scope.
Alignment of the Directive's scope with that of the Parent-Subsidiary Directive is thus one of the main goals.
Accordingly that court requested the Court of Justice to define the directive's scope.
The amendments proposed in this recast aim to extend the Directive's scope and apply the tax exemption in a wider number of cases.
The directive's scope ratione personae is defined in Chapter I(‘General provisions')- to be more precise, in Article 3 under the heading‘Beneficiaries'- as follows.
Definitions are added for the different kinds of establishments falling within the Directive's scope and"inspections".
Article 3 defines the directive's scope, stating that it relates, in principle, to all landfills, as defined in Article 2.
Amendment 5 is a new recital(now seen as 5c)clarifying the Directive's scope which the Commission accepts in full.
Turning to situations causing problems for the directive's application, the Commission considers that market developments in the sector have brought a considerable number of new products which,whilst involving the use of holiday accommodation, do not fall within the directive's scope.
This would bring a substantial amount of information within the directive's scope, thereby making it more effective.
This recast naturally requires the expansion of the directive's scope, so as to contribute to the protection of human health and the ecologically correct recycling and disposal of waste from electrical and electronic equipment.
For this reason, it calls for a climate change impact assessment to be included in the SEA stage of plans and programmes- in compliance with the proportionality principle- andfor any extension of the EIA directive's scope to cover global climate change to be abandoned.
It results from a different interpretation of the Directive's scope related to the definition of an'equivalent material' and the applicability of the corresponding fire safety standards.
The EESC would however point out that the current definition of toys is not adequate to the scope of the objectives set, as not only does it not permit the updating needed to keep abreast of developments on the technology market, butit also establishes a list of products that do not fall within the directive's scope.
Their introduction into EU law would require either an extension of the Directive's scope, as it currently regulates only sulphur fuel standards, or the adoption of a new instrument.
For this reason, it calls for guidance on implementing this aspect, and for a climate change impact assessment to also be included in the SEA stage of plans and programmes- in compliance with the proportionality principle- andfor any extension of the EIA directive's scope to cover global climate change to be abandoned.
The EESC further takes the view that an extension of the directive's scope with a provision on"adaptation to the new challenge" must apply exclusively to projects with a high and quantifiable expected impact on the environment.
With regard to the adverse reactions likely to apply to one or more stages of the donation and transplant process andas stated in comment 5.4, the EESC considers that the text includes a stage that does not feature in the directive's scope- testing- and omits two stages that are described and which could have adverse effects- characterisation and preservation.
The EESC further takes the view that an extension of the directive's scope with a provision on"adaptation to new challenges" must apply to any projects with an expected impact on aspects of environmental protection that are under evaluation.
Regarding the proposal to include a provision on"adaptation of the EIA to new challenges",the EESC takes the view that such an extension of the directive's scope must apply to any projects with an expected impact on the aspects of environmental protection that are under evaluation.
The directive's scope excludes third country nationals who are posted workers 9 because they do not form part of the labour market of the Member State to which they are posted, intra-corporate transferees, contractual service suppliers and graduate trainees, seasonal workers and lastly third-country nationals who have acquired long-term resident status.
Regarding the proposal to include a provision on"adaptation of the EIA to new challenges",the EESC takes the view that such an extension of the directive's scope must apply exclusively to projects with a high and quantifiable expected impact on the aspects of environmental protection that are under evaluation.
Aside from that, I would like to emphasise the difficult issue of the directive's scope, which excludes a number of areas, such as non-economic services of general interest and some services(social services, childcare, assistance to people, and so on) carried out by providers mandated by the State.
I want to emphasise that I am pleased with the amendments which have been adopted andwhich I tabled with regard to defining specifically the directive's scope, ensuring a regular exchange of best practice between Member States and more clearly assigning liability between countries, licence holders and the regulatory body.
The EESC broadly agrees with the thrust of the Commission proposal as regards extending the directive's scope, defining and clarifying the nature of new products, strengthening requirements for pre-contractual and contractual information, standardising the withdrawal period and prohibiting any payment, for any reason whatsoever, during this period.
Regarding the proposal to include a provision on"adaptation of the EIA to new challenges",the EESC takes the view that such an extension of the directive's scope must apply to any projects with an expected impact on the aspects of environmental protection that are under evaluation, with the proportionality principle playing an important role and the various preparation and implementation stages of the project being clearly distinguished.
As regards the directive's territorial scope, the Court observes that Google Spain is a subsidiary of Google Inc. on Spanish territory and, therefore, an‘establishment' within the meaning of the directive. .