Examples of using An implementation action in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
We continue to implement the resolution, and preparations are under way for an implementation action plan.
Article 36: On-site assistance; Development of an implementation action plan; Capacity-building for law enforcement agencies.
Individual requests were received for: legal advice; technological assistance;and the development of an implementation action plan.
These are: legislative drafting and legal advice; model legislation;the development of an implementation action plan; a summary of good practices or lessons learned; model treaties or agreements; capacity-building programmes; assistance by an on-site expert; technological assistance; and a" catch-all" category for other assistance.
Individual requests were received for: an on-site visitby an anti-corruption expert; and the development of an implementation action plan.
People also translate
The other types of needs were: model legislation(one State);the development of an implementation action plan(one State); and capacity-building programmes(one State).
The States parties shall design[The Mechanism shall contain] followup procedures for each of the reports referred to in paragraphs[approved[outcome][summary][aggregate]report][an implementation action plan].
The comprehensive self-assessment checklist contains several predetermined categories of technical assistance needs: legislative drafting and legal advice; model legislation;development of an implementation action plan; a summary of good practices or lessons learned; model treaties or agreements; capacity-building programmes; assistance by an on-site expert; technological assistance; and a. .
ESCWA put forward a plan for the updating of the Sustainable Development Initiative in the Arab Region andits development into an Arab strategic framework on sustainable development, along with an implementation action plan.
Articles 34 and 35:Good practices/lessons learned; On-site assistance; Development of an implementation action plan; also for article 34: Model legislation.
Of the six States parties identifying technical assistance needs to support the implementation of article 15, the main types of needs were: a summary of good practices and lessons learned(three States); legislative drafting and legal advice(two States); model legislation(two States); capacity-building programmes(two States);and the development of an implementation action plan(one State).
The Government had accepted 121 of the 128 recommendations made to it under the universal periodic review in February 2010(A/HRC/14/10)and had drawn up an implementation action plan that would enter the statute book and be binding on all parties concerned.
For example, one speaker highlighted the steps his country had taken to publish its countryreview report and develop an implementation action plan for competent authorities, which included legislative amendments and institutional measures to strengthen the specialization of relevant investigating institutions on one hand, and improve the management of corruption cases and the collection and use of statistics on the other.
Article 15: Good practices/lessons learned; legislative drafting; legal advice; on-site assistance by an anti-corruption expert;development of an implementation action plan; inter-agency coordination and investigative training.
Of the eight States parties identifying technical assistance needs to support the implementation of article 31 of the Convention, the main types of needs were: legislative drafting and legal advice(four States); model legislation(four States); a summary of good practices and lessons learned(three States); capacity-building programmes(two States);the development of an implementation action plan(one State); and an on-site expert(one State).
Of the eight States parties identifying technical assistance needs to support the implementation of article 30 of the Convention, the types of needs were: a summary of good practicesand lessons learned(five States); the development of an implementation action plan(four States); on-site assistance by an anti-corruption expert(three States); legislative drafting and legal advice(two States); model legislation(one State); and capacity-building programmes(one State).
Article 50: Good practices/lessons learned and the creation/operation of a specialized anti-corruption unit in the police; on-site assistance by a relevant expert; capacity-building; development of an implementation action plan; model agreements/arrangements; legal advice to amend the Anti-Wiretapping Law.
Of the seven States parties requesting technical assistance to support the implementation of article 36 of the Convention, the main types of assistance requested were: other assistance(five States); model legislation, a summary of good practices and lessons learned(three States);the development of an implementation action plan(two States); and on-site assistance by a relevant expert(two States).
Of the eight States parties requesting technical assistance to support the implementation of article 30 of the Convention, the types of assistance requested were: other assistance(five States); model legislation, a summary of goodpractices and lessons learned(four States); the development of an implementation action plan(four States); legislative drafting and legal advice(two States); and on-site assistance by an anti-corruption expert(two States).
Of the three States parties identifying technical assistance needs to support the implementation of article 40 of the Convention, the types of needs were: a summary of good practices and lessons learned(two States); capacity-building programmes(two States); legislative drafting and legal advice(one State);the development of an implementation action plan(one State); and on-site assistance by a relevant expert(one State).
Of the six States parties identifying technical assistance needs to support the implementation of article 34 of the Convention, the types of needs were: a summary of good practices and lessons learned(three States); legislative drafting and legal advice(two States);the development of an implementation action plan(two States); on-site assistance by a relevant expert(two States); model legislation(one State); and capacity-building programmes(one State).
Of the six States parties identifying technical assistance needs to support the implementation of article 33 of the Convention, the types of needs were: capacity-building programmes(five States); legislative drafting and legal advice(four States); model legislation(four States); a summary of good practices and lessons learned(four States);the development of an implementation action plan(two States); and on-site assistance by a relevant expert(two States).
Of the seven States parties requesting technical assistance to support the implementation of article 23 of the Convention, the types of assistance requested were: model legislation, a summary of good practices and lessons learned(five States); legislative drafting andlegal advice(three States); the development of an implementation action plan(three States); on-site assistance by an anti-corruption expert(two States); and other assistance in the form of training(two States).
Of the eleven States parties identifying technical assistance needs to support the implementation of article 16, the main types of needs were: legislative drafting and legal advice(eight States); model legislation(six States); a summary of good practices and lessons learned(four States); on-site assistance by an anti-corruption expert(four States);and the development of an implementation action plan and capacity-building programmes(one State each).
Of the two States parties identifying technical assistance needs to support the implementation of article 17 of the Convention, the main types of needs were: legislative drafting and legal advice(both States); model legislation(one State);the development of an implementation action plan(one State); and on-site assistance by an anti-corruption expert(one State).
Of the two States parties identifying technical assistance needs to support the implementation of article 19 of the Convention, the main types of needs were: legislative drafting and legal advice and a summary of goodpractices and lessons learned(both States); the development of an implementation action plan(one State); capacity-building programmes(one State); and technological assistance(one State).
Of the eight States parties identifying technical assistance needs to support the implementation of article 23 of the Convention, the types of needs were: a summary of good practices and lessons learned(six States); model legislation(six States); legislative drafting and legal advice(five States);the development of an implementation action plan(five States); on-site assistance by an anti-corruption expert(four States); and capacity-building programmes(two States).
Of the five States parties identifying technical assistance needs to support the implementation of article 18 of the Convention, the main types of needs were: legislative drafting and legal advice(three States); model legislation(three States); a summary of goodpractices and lessons learned(three States); the development of an implementation action plan(one State); on-site assistance by an anti-corruption expert(one State); and technological assistance(one State).
Of the eight States parties identifying technical assistance needs to support the implementation of article 21 of the Convention, the types of needs were: a summary of good practices and lessons learned(six States); model legislation(five States); legislative drafting and legal advice(three States);the development of an implementation action plan(two States); capacity-building programmes(one State); and on-site assistance by an anti-corruption expert(one State).