Examples of using Cannot consider in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
I cannot consider this a full.
It is submitted that, accordingly, the Committee cannot consider the author ' s complaint ratione materiae.
You cannot consider what is obviously inferior.
Therefore, the State party claims that the Committee cannot consider communications submitted to it by a third party.
Obviously, one cannot consider each particular State concerned to be responsible for all cases of statelessness resulting from the succession.
The Group believes itis important to note that the Sanctions Committee cannot consider an exemption unless a supplying State submits an exemption request.
The Agency cannot consider such samples as an alternative to smears.
What is crucialis that the issues raised in criminal proceedings can be reviewed, but that does not mean that the higher court cannot consider appeals submitted by the prosecution.
Listen, you cannot consider this.
The 23 million people of the Republic of China deserve no less than proper international recognition,and as long as they are excluded from the United Nations we cannot consider this body universally representative of the peoples of the world.
If a business cannot consider simple procedures like.
Firstly, the Committee points out that the Special Rapporteur ' s decision not to separate the decisions on admissibility and the merits(see para. 1.2 above)does not mean that the Committee cannot consider the two matters separately nor does it imply simultaneous consideration.
Although all chemicals cannot considered with alcohal etc., once food to be safty one not cornic and crises to the farmer.
How then can this undermine something that it is in fact strengthening? Moreover, one cannot consider continuing to grant legitimacy to the possibility that certain States have a nuclear option and others do not. .
However, one cannot consider that cases in which responsibility may arise for an international organization under sets of circumstances corresponding to those envisaged with regard to States are wholly unlikely.
If you only check out these results,you might see the best brokers you can choose from, but cannot consider yourself to be an expert if you only rely on results that are based on facts you cannot be sure of.
It recalls that it cannot consider alleged violations of the Covenant which occurred before the entry into force of the Optional Protocol for the State party, unless these violations continue after that date or continue to have effects which in themselves constitute a violation of the Covenant.
Regarding the author ' s claim that his incarceration from 8 October 1981 to 7 October 1982 was arbitrary, in violation of article 9, paragraph 1, of the Covenant, given that his conviction was expunged by Amnesty Law 82/21,the Committee recalls that it cannot consider alleged violations of the Covenant which occurred before the entry into force of the Optional Protocol for the State party, unless these violations continue after that date or continue to have effects which in themselves constitute a violation of the Covenant.
The Committee recalls that it cannot consider alleged violations of the Covenant which occurred before the entry into force of the Optional Protocol for a State party, unless these violations continue after that date or continue to have effects which in themselves constitute a violation of the Covenant.
In its jurisprudence under the Optional Protocol, the Committee has consistently held that it cannot consider alleged violations of the Covenant which occurred before the entry into force of the Optional Protocol for the State party, unless the violations complained of continue after the entry into force of the Optional Protocol.
As to the State party 's argument that the Committee cannot consider communications submitted to it by a third party, the Committee notes that there is nothing in the Optional Protocol that prevents the authors from designating third parties as recipients of the Committee ' s correspondence on their behalf.
In its jurisprudence under the Optional Protocol,the Committee has held that it cannot consider alleged violations of the Covenant which occurred before the entry into force of the Optional Protocol for the State party, unless the violations complained of continue after the entry into force of the Optional Protocol.
The Committee notes with regret that the Ombudsman cannot consider petitions about actions and decisions of the President, the Parliament, the executive branch of Government, the Constitutional Council, the Attorney General, the Central Election Commission and the courts that relate to economic, social and cultural rights.
The Committee refers to its prior jurisprudence and reiterates that it cannot consider alleged violations of the Covenant which occurred before the entry into force of the Optional Protocol for the State party, unless these violations continue after that date or continue to have effects which in themselves constitute a violation of the Covenant.
The author refers to the State party 's contention that the Committee cannot consider individual communications concerning serious human rights violations such as violations of the right to life because such communications should be examined in a global context, and an individual approach would not reflect the sociopolitical and security context in which the events occurred.
The author refers to the State party 's claim that the Committee cannot consider individual communications concerning cases of serious human rights violations such as violations of the right to life, since these should be addressed within a global framework because an individual approach does not set them within the sociopolitical circumstances and security conditions in which they occurred.
However, since the COP andthe CRIC focus primarily on the global review and cannot consider all the detailed information provided to it in reports, there is an opportunity for more extensive use to be made of this valuable information in subregional/regional forums such as the information platforms created through subregional and regional action programmes, and as information to be used as part of the communication strategy to enhance the profile of the Convention.
You can't consider it a reoccurrence.
On 10 July 2009,the Federal Office for Migration determined that it could not consider the merits of the complainant ' s asylum request, because the complainant had not provided a valid identification document.
Since the Commission could not consider, let alone investigate, all allegations of damage to cultural property, 81/ it has selected two examples which are typical of such breaches.