Examples of using Infrastructure operators in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Infrastructure operators were often nationalized and competition was reduced by mergers and acquisitions.
Among all private parties to a project, infrastructure operators are the ones with the longest lasting involvement in the project.
Infrastructure operators may also have detailed technical and performance reporting requirements.
Since 2008, the German Government and German critical infrastructure operators have been cooperating in a public private partnership.
Infrastructure operators were often nationalized and competition was reduced by mergers and acquisitions.
As a general rule, however, it is important to define reasonable limits to the extent andtype of information that infrastructure operators are required to submit.
The existence of a special legal regime applicable to infrastructure operators and public service providers is not limited to the legal systems referred to above.
The term“regulatory bodies” refers to the institutional mechanisms required to implement andmonitor the rules governing the activities of infrastructure operators.
The existence of a special legal regime applicable to infrastructure operators and public service providers is not limited to the legal systems referred to above.
As a general rule, however, it is important to define reasonable limits to the extent andtype of information that infrastructure operators are required to submit.
The existence of a special legal regime applicable to infrastructure operators and public service providers is not limited to the legal systems referred to above.
The purpose of these restrictions is typically toensure the contracting authority's control over the qualifications of infrastructure operators or public service providers.
Special accounting rules for infrastructure operators have also been introduced in some countries to take into account the particular revenue profile of infrastructure projects.
This, in turn, requires that regulatory bodies should be able to take decisions without interference orinappropriate pressures from infrastructure operators and public service providers.
The rate-of-return method has beenfound to provide a high degree of security for infrastructure operators, since the concessionaire is assured that the tariffs charged will be sufficient to cover its operating expenses and allow the agreed rate of return.
This, in turn, requires that regulatory agencies should be able to take decisions without interference orinappropriate pressures from infrastructure operators and public service providers.
The possible disadvantage of the rate-of-returnmethod is that it provides little incentive for infrastructure operators to minimize their costs because of the assurance that those costs will be recovered through tariff adjustments.
Some international financial institutions may also provide equity or mezzanine capital, by investing in capitalmarket funds specialized in securities issued by infrastructure operators.
The possible disadvantage of the rate-of-returnmethod is that it provides little incentive for infrastructure operators to minimize their costs because of the assurance that those costs will be recovered through tariff adjustments.
Granting the regulatory body a sufficient level of autonomy to ensure that its decisions are taken without political interference orinappropriate pressures from infrastructure operators and public service providers.
The Chairman said that the text in square brackets spelled out that anyrights enjoyed by public utility companies and infrastructure operators under those laws must also be extended to the concessionaire.
The contracting authority should determine the type of information to be provided by the bidders to substantiate their qualification, including, for instance,quality indicators of their past performance as public service providers or infrastructure operators.
General legislative provisions of this type may promote the confidence of the public in the controlbeing exercised by the Government in respect of the qualifications of infrastructure operators or public service providers.
It is advisable to avoid burdening the law with details concerning qualification requirements and to leave it instead to regulations or to the awarding authority to set forth the type of information to be provided by the project consortia, including, for instance,quality indicators of their past performance as public service providers or infrastructure operators.
Regulatory competence should be entrusted to functionally independent bodies with a sufficient level of autonomy to ensure that their decisions are taken without political interference orinappropriate pressures from infrastructure operators and public service providers.
The concessionaire shall have the right to enter upon, transit through or do work or fix installations upon property of third parties, as appropriate and required for the implementation of the project in accordance with[the enacting State indicates the provisions of its laws that govern easements andother similar rights enjoyed by public utility companies and infrastructure operators under its laws].
An infrastructure operator, whether public or private, has little incentive to lower prices or improve quality in such a situation.
Furthermore, the infrastructure projects discussed in this Guide involve the establishment of a lasting bundle of rights andobligations between the infrastructure operator and the Government, through a project agreement or sector-specific regulations.