Examples of using Standardisation process in English and their translations into Finnish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
SMEs should be encouraged and supported to participate in the standardisation process.
The standardisation process, undertaken in ETSI, also received considerable support from the Community.
Technical regulations are laid down as part of the standardisation process, and the same is true here.
The standardisation process must remain voluntary, consensus-based and market-driven.
Likewise, national public authorities should participate more actively in the standardisation process.
The standardisation process was collaborative and consensus based and did not favour any particular stakeholder.
As I have stated in my report, this automation and standardisation process should be in place three months before the introduction of notes and coins.
The standard methods of quantitative analysis of binary and ternary textile fibre mixtures currently included in two of the directives are to be transferred to the standardisation process.
Unlike in Example 7, paragraph 331, the standardisation process has not been carried out in an open and transparent manner.
While some NSBs have made good progress in this area,others need to be more proactive in involving stakeholders who have not traditionally participated in the standardisation process.
Accelerated development andimplementation of new technologies by strengthening the standardisation process and bringing it into line with Community principles;
Encourage the standardisation process by concentrating on the functional specifications of communications systems and harmonised message format ting and user commands.
It should be stressed that these CEN-CENELEC guides should be used throughout the standardisation process, from the reflection on the need to draft a standard through to its publication.
This means that the standardisation process and priorities will include new radio access technologies but not limited to these, as promoted by some non-EU countries.
To green products effectively, non-legislative solutions, such as environmental agreements and the standardisation process, need to be considered in addition to legislation.
Secondly, although the standardisation process is open and transparent, it can be seen as over-complex to an uninitiated audience- even one with sound and appropriate environmental knowledge.
It also means that attention should focus on a timely, effective,open and transparent standardisation process which, like regulation, should remain technology-neutral by relying on performance indicators.
The standardisation process plays an important role in ensuring the quality of public or private products and services, as well as in respect for safety, environmental and social-responsibility standards.
It is important for the Commission that it is possible to take ina fruitful product of the standardisation process, but also to ensure that this is not the case if the result of the standardisation process is unsatisfactory.
Therefore, SMES and societal stakeholders who represent these wider groups(e.g. consumers, trade unions, environmental NGOs, organisations for and of persons with disabilities)must be closely involved in the standardisation process.
STRESSES that interested parties such as workers', consumers', andenvironmental interest groups should be fully involved in the standardisation process at all relevant stages, when standards are drawn up at the international level;
The report also advocates all interested parties, and in particular representatives of SMEs and all those who represent the public interest, including consumers,being encouraged to actually participate in the standardisation process.
The investigation will focus in particular on whether the standardisation process limits market entry or innovation, for example through the exclusion of new entrants and payment providers who are not controlled by a bank.
INVITES the European standards bodies to develop orimprove existing mechanisms, supplementing consensus at national level, allowing them to give broad consideration to the positions expressed by the various interest groups during the standardisation process;
If the standardisation process necessarily involves change of track widths, widths of platforms or changes of voltage on electrified lines, as it will in some parts of the EU, then good luck to you all, but leave us out.
However, this is an area where technical or urban planning choices intersect with the choices of society,and it is not acceptable that standards be laid down for the public at large by working parties without a guarantee that the standardisation process is subject to political control.
The existing mechanisms supporting the implementation of the legislation(standardisation process, working groups, market surveillance, administrative cooperation(AdCo), and the development of guidance documents…) will not be affected by the nature of the legal instrument and will continue to operate in the same manner under the Regulation as they currently do under the Directive.
Although the detailed methodology to determine the electricity from cogeneration as proposed in amendment 70 may be a possible method, the Commission finds it inappropriate to include this method as an annex to the Directive because this methodology is still not developed andis also subject to review and adjustments in the above mentioned standardisation process.
Here, the specific objectives are to improve the standardisation process, i.e. the development of TSIs, to increase the scope of TSIs to incorporate the work of the Commission's Task Force, to reduce the number of national rules imposed by Member States on top of the TSIs, and to reduce the time for re-authorisation in each Member State SO4.
The Commission invites Member States and Acceding Countries to help all stakeholders, particularly those representing societal concerns and public interests related to environmental matters, including public authorities, to participate in the standardisation process andto formulate consensual positions to be presented at European level as part of the standardisation process.