Examples of using Comparative assertions in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
With comparisons/ comparative assertions.
Comparative assertions(as defined by ISO 14044) are not supported.
Without comparisons/ comparative assertions.
Including comparative assertions with additional requirements.
B2B/ B2C with comparisons/ comparative assertions.
Comparisons or comparative assertions intended to be disclosed to the public.
B2B/ B2C without comparisons/ comparative assertions.
The OEFSR shall describe the uncertainties common to the sector and should identify the range in whichresults could be seen as not being significantly different in comparisons or comparative assertions.
Whether the study is intended for comparison or for comparative assertions to be disclosed to the public;
No, it will be publically available butit is not intended to be used for comparisons or comparative assertions.
Whether for the purpose of comparisons and/or comparative assertions intended to be disclosed to the public;
In the PEF, the six criteria shall always be considered, while the eight ISO criteriashall all be considered only for comparative assertions.
Whether the study is intended for comparisons or for comparative assertions to be disclosed to the public(requiring an OEFSR);
This is, for example, the case for the management of improved environmentalperformance as well as for making comparisons or comparative assertions.
If the OEF studies are not to be used for comparative assertions intended to be disclosed to the public, they may be carried out without using OEFSRs.
PEF studies intended to support comparative assertions to be disclosed to the public(i.e. claims about the environmental superiority or equivalence of the product) shall be based both on this PEF Guide and related PEFCRs.
The PEFCR shall specify the review requirements forPEF studies intended to be used for comparative assertions to be disclosed to the public e.g. whether a review by at least 3 independent qualified external reviewers is sufficient.
PEF studies intended to support comparative assertions to be disclosed to the public(i.e. claims about the environmental superiority or equivalence of product compared to other product) shall be based both on this PEF Guide and related PEFCRs.
Comparative assertion with additional requirements.
OEF studies intended to support a comparative assertion require review by 3 independent external reviewers.
Levels of reporting requirements depending on the application i.e. internal use,3rd party, comparative assertion.
A study to support a comparative assertion intended to be disclosed to the public shall be based on relevant PEFCRs and reviewed by an independent external reviewer together with a stakeholder panel.
An OEF study to support a comparative assertion intended to be disclosed to the public shall be based on relevant OEFSRs and critically reviewed by at least three independent qualified external reviewers.
A PEF study to support a comparative assertion intended to be disclosed to the public shall be based on relevant PEFCRs and critically reviewed by an independent panel of three qualified external reviewers.