Examples of using Nonlethal in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
Well, it's nonlethal.
If nonlethal glimmersnap and aetherpulse charges fail to dislodge the defenders, canister explosives would be most effective.
Looks mean, but it's nonlethal.
So if they had nonlethal weapons, then they would say.
I was very surprised when I started to do this to see that, in fact,even the people who advocated the use of nonlethal weapons by the military hadn't actually done that.
We are willing to consider cuts, but nonlethal”, he pointed Galadí, who recalled that before the center had about four million annual budget.
And of course, being Australian, I started looking at stuff in Australia,knowing from my own experience of various times when nonlethal weapons have been introduced in Australia.
One of those problems is: nonlethal weapons may be used indiscriminately.
The Investigative Mechanism also refused to study the revelations by Syria concerning the supply of gas to the jihadists by US andBritish companies Federal Laboratories, NonLethal Technologies, and Chemring Defence UK 9.
A lot ofthe weaponry used is all nonlethal-- for instance, tornadoes or glue.
So this nonlethal weapon was being used in this case as a lethal force multiplier, to make killing more effective in this particular situation.
I'm talking about military uses of nonlethal weapons, so why is this relevant?
One particular thing that's come up that I am especially interested in, is the question of whether, when we're sending military personnel to do these sorts of jobs, we ought to be equipping them differently; and in particular,whether we ought to be giving them access to some of the nonlethal weapons that police have.
Washington already supplies nonlethal military equipment to Ukraine, but there is a growing push to send arms, from rifles to anti-tank weapons.
The last thing that I would like to say: When I'm talking to the police about what a perfect nonlethal weapon would look like, they almost inevitably say the same thing.
So I think yes, there may be ways that nonlethal weapons will be great in these situations, but there's also a whole heap of problems that need to be considered as well.
They're trained to think more, to try and De-escalate.So if you have these problems with police officers with nonlethal weapons, what on earth would make you think it's going to be better with military personnel?
Washington already supplies nonlethal military equipment to Ukraine, but top officials are reportedly leaning toward sending arms, from rifles to anti-tank weapons.
So the suggestion is, if we're going to send robots out and allow them to do this,maybe it would be a good idea if they were armed with nonlethal weapons, so if the robot makes a bad decision and shoots the wrong person, again, they haven't actually killed them.
So there's a whole range of different nonlethal weapons we could give military personnel, and there's a whole range of situations where they're looking at them and saying.
The Obama administration had publicly contemplated delivering the same range of lethalweapons but held back, supplying only"nonlethal" military equipment, in part to assuage concerns raised by Germany, France and other EU countries which opposed the move.
So again, they would say,"With access to nonlethal weapons, if we have got someone we know is hostile, we can do something to deal with them, and know that if we hit anyone else, at least we're not going to kill them.
Now, there's a whole range of different sorts of nonlethal weapons, some of which are available now, some of which they're developing.
A second problem people sometimes talk about with military use of nonlethal weapons-- and it's actually why, in the chemical weapons convention, it's very clear that you can't use riot-control agents as weapons of warfare-- is that it's seen that sometimes nonlethal weapons might be used not as an alternative to lethal force, but as a lethal force multiplier: that you use nonlethal weapons first, so your lethal weapons will actually be more effective.
So I started to investigate some of those issues, and have a look at the way police use nonlethal weapons when they're introduced, and some of the problems that might arise out of those sorts of things when they actually do introduce them.
So one of the problems suggested with nonlethal weapons is that they might be used indiscriminately-- that you would use them against a whole range of people, because you don't have to worry so much anymore.
And since we have alreadyhad so many problems with police use of nonlethal weapons in various ways, I thought it would be a good idea to look at some of those things and relate it to the military context.
Some of the survivors' contracts include a"traumatic, nonlethal experience" with flexibility as to the type and timing-enduring what took place at the university fulfills that provision.
Now one of the particular issues that comesup with military use of nonlethal weapons-- and people actually say,"There might be some problems"-- there's a couple of particular problems that get focused on.
At this juncture he cited an publication byFidler in which the latter reflected on arguments that new‘nonlethal' weapons give new capabilities to military forces- which then‘effect how we evaluate the ethics of weapons‘ use' even to the point where the elements of international law concerning disarmament and of humanitarian law in armed conflict may be set aside if operational needs and new military technology require12.