Examples of using Australopithecus in English and their translations into Hungarian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Computer
Lucy” the Australopithecus.
Australopithecus isn't supposed to be in that display!
What about australopithecus?
From Australopithecus evolved three or four species.
Both fossils were later classified as Australopithecus africanus.
Lucy Australopithecus afarensis.
Homo habilis lived2 million years ago in Africa alongside Australopithecus.
The Australopithecus is estimated to be 3.6 million years old.
The human family began with two genera known as Australopithecus(= sydapa) and Homo.
Australopithecus sediba may have been approximately 1.3 meters tall.
They also looked at changes in thebrain size of human ancestors such as Australopithecus and Ardipithecus.
Australopithecus lived in Africa from about 4 to 1 million years ago.
The features are quite primitive and share many traits with Australopithecus afarensis, thus Australopithecus aethiopicusis likely to be a direct descendant.
Australopithecus had no time to enjoy himself… because around every corner was danger.
At apparently the same epoch as the emergence of Australopithecus robustus, there arose a new animal, Homo habilis, the first true man.
Australopithecus was an ape-like man whose brain was smaller than our approximately between 375 and 550 cm3.
Humans first evolved in East Africa about 2.5 millionyears ago from a genus of apes called Australopithecus, which means Southern Ape.
Australopithecus had large jaws and molars, and smaller brains than we have today, but walked upright on two legs.
The study, published Feb. 8 in the journal Nature Communications, describes biomechanical testing of a computer-based model of an Australopithecus sediba skull.
This Australopithecus, presumably, could have been the common ancestor of both the late representatives of this family, and the human race.
According to the evolutionist claim,the living things in the Homo series are more developed than Australopithecus, and not very much different from today's man.
Australopithecus africanus was at one time promoted as the missing link, though it is no longer considered by evolutionists to be on the line from apes to humans.
Many scientists also doubt the suggestion of bipedalism, and argue that even if Australopithecus really did walk on two legs, it did not walk in the same way as humans.
Also, the Australopithecus hip and hind limb very clearly indicate bipedalism, but these fossils also indicate very inefficient locomotive movement when compared to humans.
Charles E. Oxnard, another evolutionist anatomist well-known for his research in this field,concluded that the structure of the Australopithecus skeleton resembled that of present-day orang-utans.
When analyzing fossil anatomy, Australopithecus afarensis has very similar features of the hand and shoulder to the chimpanzee, which indicates hanging arms.
There is a huge gap between Homo erectus, a human race, and the apes that precededHomo erectus in the"human evolution" scenario(Australopithecus, Homo Habilis, and Homo rudolfensis).
A human ancestor, Australopithecus anamensis, began regularly walking upright some 4 million years back, even though he was still somewhat chimpishly long-armed and short-legged.
Prof Haile-Selassie says the specimen is the best exampleyet of the ape-like human ancestor called Australopithecus anamensis- the oldest known australopithecine whose kind may have existed as far back as 4.2 million years ago.
The data collected from analysing a collection of almost 40 fossilised teeth from South African hominins, early Homo,Paranthropus robustus and Australopithecus africanus, provide the first glimpse into the practice of weaning and the role it likely played in an evolutionary context.