Examples of using Australopithecus in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
They use words like Homo Erectus and Australopithecus.
Australopithecus sediba had plant foods on the menu.
At least metaphorically,when he showed the development from the Big Bang via Australopithecus to the“Homo Cardrivernsis”.
Australopithecus to Cro-Magnon duration: 2 h 30 min.
We go to school almost all over the world, I mean, how many Australopithecus know that taught their offspring how to figured 589-78?
He called it Australopithecus africanus, the Southern Ape from Africa, wrote up the discovery and sent it to Nature.
From left to right, we have got Homo erectus, Homo habilis, and Australopithecus-- now called Paranthropus boisei, the robust australopithecine.
This Australopithecus, presumably, could have been the common ancestor of both the late representatives of this family, and the human race.
As well as Orrorin, Toumaïand the two Ardipithecus(A. ramidusand A. kabbada),it also includes the Australopithecus and the members of the Homo genus.
June 27, 2012: Australopithecus sediba had plant foods on the menu.
The series consisted of two pilot episodes- amusical version of Aaron and Moses's quest to free the Hebrews and a prehistoric love story between a Homo erectus and an Australopithecus.
The broad-faced Australopithecus boisei looks anything but friendly.
Another thing that complicates the picture is that their brains were relatively small and rather reminds and Homo habilis,or maybe even the primitiga förmänniskan Australopithecus.
Photo by Raymond Strom Australopithecus('southern ape') is the name given to a number of fossils found in Africa.
Zu Bild'In 1994,she found the remains of the oldest known species of Australopithecus, Australopithecus anamensis, on its rocky shores.
The australopithecus which was closer to the apes, and the homo habilis which resembled man much more and is considered a human by many researchers.
So she belongs to our family tree, but within that, of course, you do detailed analysis, and weknow now that she belongs to the Lucy species, known as Australopithecus afarensis.
Dart was eventually vindicated, and Australopithecus africanus stands at the beginning of the science now known as palaeoanthropology- the study of human origins and evolution.
Small australopithecines, with bodies and brains not much bigger than those of modern chimpanzees, were widespread from 3.8million to three million years ago, most famously Australopithecus afarensis like Lucy.
From left to right, we have got Homo erectus, Homo habilis, and Australopithecus-- now called Paranthropus boisei, the robust australopithecine. Three extinct species, same place, same time.
The third book follows human development- from early hominids to modern Homo sapiens- the evolutionary history of our species,the fossils of Lucy and Ardi in Chad, the Australopithecus and Ardipithecus in East Africa and the Neanderthal.
At that time, remains of another species, tentatively called Australopithecus anamensis, was discovered in the Lake Turkana region of east Africa and appears contemporary with afarensis, dating to approximately 4.2 million years ago.
Ian Tattersall, a paleoanthropologist at the American Museum of Natural History in New York, supported the discovery team's interpretationof the fossils as a previously unclassified species of advanced Australopithecus"with suggestions of Homo.
Australopithecus afarensis, remants of which were found in Laetoli at the Southern stretches of the Serengeti, arose in this eastern African tropical ecological domain. By 3.0 Ma. Australopithecus afarensis dispersed into southern Africa, and by 2.5 Ma. splitted into Paranthropus and Homo lineages.
In a paper published in the August 5 issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences, researchers at Kent State University reported that remains of both male and female specimens of Australopithecus afarensis showed fewer differences based on size than most paleontologists had earlier expected.
Kornelius Kupczik, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology The splay of tooth roots reveals how South African hominins, Australopithecus africanus and Paranthropus robustus, chewed their foodEver since the discovery of the fossil remains of Australopithecus africanus from Taung nearly a century ago, and subsequent discoveries of Paranthropus robustus, there have been disagreements about the diets of these two South African hominin species.
Each hominid is shown with a characteristic tool of its period: a Swiss army knife for the present-day human, a flat chisel for the Cro-Magnon man, a scraper for the Neanderthal man, a hand axe for Homo Erectus, a chopper for Homo Habilis,and no specific tool for the Australopithecus, even though he probably used rudimentary tools….
Especially important are rocks of around 2,5 Ma. Whereas the main hominid bearing strata(Laetolil Beds) in the Laetoli Area are older than 3 Ma,yielding Australopithecus afarensis remains and fossilized fotprints, our aim is to investigate the so-called Ndolanya Beds, which are radiometrically dated around 2,6 to 2,4 Ma. also present in the area, especially in the vicinity of Endulen.
Anthropologists from the University of Kent, working with researchers from University College London, the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany and the Vienna University of Technology in Austria, have produced the first research findings to support archaeological evidence for stone tool use among fossil australopiths three to two million years ago andfound that Australopithecus africanus used their hands the way modern humans do.
Inspired by a visit to Berlin's Natural History Museum- Leibniz Institute for Research on Evolution and Biodiversity andtheir displays of casts representing homo sapiens' ancestor australopithecus anamensis, who has been extinct for four million years. Westerlund developed a complex multi-media installation presented as subjective scientific research.