Examples of using Common asylum procedure in English and their translations into Romanian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
Providing a common asylum procedure;
A common asylum procedure should be fast and fair.
Establishment of a common asylum procedure.
Towards a common asylum procedure and a uniform status, valid throughout the Union, for persons granted asylum[COM(2000)755 final- Not published in the Official Journal].
This will remain a pious hope until common asylum procedures are adopted.
By providing a common asylum procedure for EU countries and a uniform status for those who have been granted international protection, the CEAS would create an area of protection and solidarity within the EU.
The Hague Programme set as an aim of the second-phase CEAS the establishment of a common asylum procedure in the Union.
(1) How might a common asylum procedure be achieved?
After years of debate and having signed the Treaty of Lisbon,the Committee has submitted to Parliament the first draft for a common asylum procedure between Member States.
The second phase has been working on a common asylum procedure and a uniform status for those granted asylum or subsidiary protection.
The European Union's key objective in the area of asylum entails establishing a common area of protection andsolidarity by 2012 based on a common asylum procedure.
In an opinion dated 12 July 2001 on a common asylum procedure and a uniform status22, the Committee delivered its opinion on the application of the Dublin Convention.
The Hague Programme takes up the challenge for taking forward the CEAS andlooks to the establishment of the common asylum procedure and uniform status for those granted asylum or subsidiary protection.
However, even the establishment of a common asylum procedure and a uniform status will not completely eradicate all reasons why asylum seekers may find one Member State a more attractive destination that another.
The European Council remains committed to the objective of establishing a common area of protection andsolidarity based on a common asylum procedure and a uniform status for those granted international protection.
However, major discrepancies still remain between national provisions and in the way they are applied, which need to be overcome if we want to establish a common area of protection and solidarity by 2012, based,inter alia, on a common asylum procedure.
In 1999, they set themselves the goal of adopting a common asylum procedure and giving equal status throughout the Union to persons who have been granted asylum. .
The Tampere conclusions provide that the CEAS should include, in the short term, common standards for fair and efficient asylum procedures and, in the longer term,Community rules leading to a common asylum procedure in the EC.
The Council and the European Parliament to intensify the efforts to establish a common asylum procedure and a uniform status in accordance with Article 78 TFEU for those who are granted asylum or subsidiary protection by 2012 at the latest.
The conclusions of the Tampere European Council andsubsequently the Hague Programme identified the CEAS as the most important instrument in establishing a common asylum procedure and a uniform protection status valid throughout the EU.
Significant progress towards the establishment of a common asylum procedure may furthermore be achieved by including as a mandatory element in the CEAS a single procedure for assessing applications for refugee status and for subsidiary protection.
The conclusions of theTampere European Council and subsequently the Hague Programme identified the CEAS as the most important instrument in establishing a common asylum procedure and a uniform protection status valid throughout the EU.
It is only a Regulation establishing a common asylum procedure in the Union, and whose provisions shall be directly applicable, that can provide the necessary degree of uniformity and effectiveness needed in the application of procedural rules in Union law on asylum. .
Although an important level of harmonization was reached by the adoption of the directive in 2005, further EU action is necessary in order to attain higher and more harmonised standards on asylum procedures andto take further steps towards common asylum procedures.
It will include proposals for the relevant long term components of theCEAS as described in the Hague Programme, inter alia the common asylum procedure, the uniform status for refugees and for beneficiaries of subsidiary protection and the European support office for all forms of cooperation between Member States.
(4) The Tampere Conclusions provide that a Common European Asylum System should include, in the short term, common standards for fair and efficient asylum procedures in the Member States and, in the longer term,Community rules leading to a common asylum procedure in the European Community.
Actions: The Commission will propose a new Regulation establishing a single common asylum procedure in the EU and replacing the Asylum Procedures Directive, a new Qualification Regulation replacing the Qualification Directive and targeted modifications of the Reception Conditions Directive.
The establishment of the common European asylum system and the European asylum support office should ensure uniform status,high common standards of protection in the EU and a common asylum procedure, with mutual recognition as the long term goal.
Within this framework, and in support of legislative efforts,the Hague Programme proposed the setting‑up of a European support office for all forms of cooperation between Member States relating to the Common European Asylum System(after establishment of a common asylum procedure and on the basis of an evaluation).
In the same framework, the Stockholm programme adopted by the European Council at its meeting of 10- 11 December 2009 underlined the need to establish"a common area of protection andsolidarity based on a common asylum procedure and a uniform status for those granted international protection", based on"high protection standards" and"fair and effective procedures", by 2012.