Examples of using Conditions for the exercise in English and their translations into Romanian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
Conditions for the exercise of traffic rights.
Conditions for the exercise of traffic rights Article 7.
Both Directives set out the conditions for the exercise by the Commission of this power.
Conditions for the exercise of the right of withdrawal.
To check on compliance with the conditions for the exercise of the legislative initiative by citizens.
Information concerning the rights resulting from Article 15 as well as the conditions for the exercise of those rights;
However, it provides that Member States should lay down the detailed conditions for the exercise of the right to damages.
Such legislation means that conditions for the exercise of this right are not the same for non-nationals as for nationals.
In the specific case of family members it is to be emphasized that this proposal does not touch upon conditions for the exercise of the right to family reunification.
(12) Article 9a is added to provide for conditions for the exercise of the power to adopt delegated acts by the European Commission.
Articles 116-117: These provisions concern the Commission's empowerments to adopt the delegated andimplementing acts necessary under the new Regulation and they establish the conditions for the exercise of this delegation.
Directive 2003/86 determines the conditions for the exercise of the right to family reunification by third country nationals residing lawfully in the territory of the Member States.
By contrast, certain State acts such as authorisations or licences whereby the State ora public authority establishes the conditions for the exercise of an economic activity, should not qualify as concessions.
Member States should therefore ensure, either by legislation or by means of contractual clauses, that consumers have a statutory or contractual right to early repayment; nevertheless,Member States should be able to define the conditions for the exercise of such a right.
In accordance with Article1 of that directive, its purpose is‘to determine the conditions for the exercise of the right to family reunification by third country nationals residing lawfully in the territory of the Member States'.
Including such professions in the general system for the recognition of diplomas is not contrary to Article 47(3) EC, which states that the progressive abolition of restrictions on the right of establishment must be preceded oraccompanied by a correlating coordination of the conditions for the exercise of those professions.
States have the sovereign right to determine,in line with the international norms by which they are bound, the conditions for the exercise by their nationals of the right to vote in national elections, including conditions requiring residence in the country.
Although the 1997 Law repealed those laws, it was in turn repealed by the NAG as of 1 January 2006, and the latter legislation constituted, according to the referring court, a stricter approach comparedwith the 1997 Law, as regards the conditions for the exercise of freedom of establishment by Turkish nationals.
First, in respect of Directive 2003/86,Article 1 provides that, its purpose is to determine the conditions for the exercise of the right to family reunification by third-country nationals residing lawfully in the territory of the Member States.
Whereas the Council Directive of 25 February 1964 1 coordinated special measures concerning the movement and residence of foreign nationals which are justified on grounds of public policy, public security or public health and whereas Commission Regulation(EEC)No 1251/70 2 of 29 June 1970 on the right of workers to remain in the territory of a Member State after having been employed in that State laid down conditions for the exercise of such right;
On this point, it should be recalled that in accordance with Article 1 of that directive its purpose is to determine the conditions for the exercise of the right to family reunification by third country nationals residing lawfully in the territory of the Member States.
Where an investigation conducted by the EPPO reveals that the specific conditions for the exercise of its competence set out in Article 25(2) and(3) are no longer met, the competent Permanent Chamber shall decide to refer the case to the competent national authorities without undue delay and before initiating prosecution at national courts.
Whereas Directive No 64/221/EEC(3) coordinated special measures concerning the movement and residence of foreign nationals which are justified on grounds of public policy, public security or public health andwhereas Directive No 75/34/EEC(4) laid down conditions for the exercise of the right of nationals of a Member State to remain in the territory of another Member State after having pursued therein an activity in a self-employed capacity;
In those circumstances,it must be held that, by worsening the conditions for the exercise of freedom of establishment by Turkish nationals compared with the conditions applicable to them previously under the provisions adopted since the entry into force of the Additional Protocol,the NAG constitutes a‘new restriction' within the meaning of Article 41(1) of that protocol.
So far as concerns, first of all, Directive 2003/86,it must be stated that, under Article 1, its purpose is to determine the conditions for the exercise of the right to family reunification by third country nationals residing lawfully in the territory of the Member States.
Moreover, it must be borne in mind that the Law on Residence and the Law on Aliens, mentioned in paragraph 21 of the present judgment,were the provisions applicable to the conditions for the exercise of freedom of establishment of Turkish nationals in Austria, at the time of the accession of that Member State to the European Union on 1 January 1995 and, therefore, of the entry into force of the Additional Protocol in that Member State.
Reporting obligations and conditions for the exercising thereof are established through internal regulations by the General Meeting.