Examples of using A receiving state in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Thus, the expulsion of nationals can only be carried out with the consent of a receiving State.
A receiving State must abide by the conditions agreed with the transmitting State. .
In that sense,we have been both a country of origin and a receiving State.
For example, a receiving State may owe identical obligations to a large number of sending States in the field of diplomatic or consular immunities.
Indeed, the only absolute prerequisite to the expulsion of a national is the existence of a receiving State.
People also translate
The responsibility of a receiving State to protect diplomatic and consular missions in its territory was at the heart of international law relating to diplomatic relations.
In other words, a State cannot expel its nationals without the express consent of a receiving State.
The responsibility of a receiving State to ensure the security of the diplomatic and consular missions in its territory was central to international law on diplomatic relations.
However, if, for exceptional reasons it must take such action,it may do so only with the consent of a receiving State.
A receiving State which has accepted the delivery of a person in accordance with paragraph 3 may, in turn, request the flag State to accept delivery of that person.
It nevertheless has legal ramifications,particularly with regard to the relationship between the displaced population and a receiving State.
It should also be understood as referring to a mission to the Government of a receiving State that had consented to receiving the mission.
Ecuador is one of the countries that has made the greatest effort to protect and guarantee the rights of migrants,both as a sending and as a receiving State.
Being a national of an enemy State was not grounds for expulsion, and a receiving State should have the means to protect both its nationals and the aliens present in its territory.
Persecution may fall short of torture, so the Refugee Convention applies in circumstances where one fears a lesser form of ill-treatment in a receiving State.
There was no reason to think that a receiving State could deny an individual rights that did not fall within the category of fundamental rights just because he or she had arrived in the country by way of expulsion from another country.
Support was expressed for the proposal, in draft article 6,that the host State intervene in the search for a receiving State when expelling a stateless person.
Under Article 9 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, a receiving state may"at any time and without having to explain its decision" declare any member of a diplomatic staff persona non grata.
It is broader as a‘refugee', a person with a right to non-refoulement under Article 33 of that Convention, is a person who faces a“wellfounded fear of persecution” on particular grounds(e.g. race, religion) in a receiving State.
Under the Protocol, persons(or institutions) are not liable to criminal prosecution if they procure the illegal entry orpermit the illegal residence of a migrant in a receiving State for reasons that do not involve financial or material gain.
Although the agreement makes clear that a receiving State must pay any costs incurred by a disaster relief operation which it cancels, it refrains from explicitly providing that receiving States are liable for costs of disaster relief operations as a general rule.
Under the heading of progressive development, it was also possible to consider stipulating that the expelling State could be involved in the search for a receiving State in the event that the stateless person had not found one within a reasonable period of time.
Some States have also continued to be engaged in the practice of seeking diplomatic assurances to ensure that torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment orpunishment will not be inflicted on an individual suspect who is transferred to a receiving State.
This principle provides that where there is a real risk of torture or other cruel,inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment in a receiving State, the prohibition of refoulement is absolute and may not be subject to any limitations or derogations.
In addition, it should focus on the question of which obligations under international law prohibited a State from expelling aliens and then discuss whether, as part of the topic, it should take up the scope and content of human rights applicable to persons being expelled in an expelling State andto persons having been expelled in a receiving State.
The Nordic Mutual Assistance Agreement in Connection with Radiation Accidents provides that a receiving State may request termination of disaster relief assistance"any time", but that the assisting State may only terminate its assistance if, in its opinion, certain conditions are met.
The Netherlands noted that its national authorities did facilitate such a process, but in relation to the acceptance of smuggled migrantsno reported events existed, as it was a receiving State and not a State of origin.
Similarly, in its Draft Model Agreement on International Medical and Humanitarian Law, the International Law Association also recommends the inclusion of provisions on privileges andimmunities in bilateral agreements between a receiving State and an entity( in particular, from a State) providing relief, and includes proposed articles on the inviolability of facilities and correspondence of the entity( article 4), exemptions from customs and taxes( article 5), as well as facilities for the entry of personnel in the territory and safety of that personnel article 14.
The Representative further observed that persons moving across an international border due to environmental factors would be entitled to general human rights guarantees in a receiving State, but would often not have a right of entry to that State. .