Examples of using Consumption reduction in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Dt1 Fuel consumption reduction.
Status of complianceissue subject to review: methyl bromide consumption reduction.
Dt2 Energy consumption reduction.
In conditions of extreme energy poverty,setting up the policy targets for energy consumption reduction is very questionable.
Diesel consumption reduction(by up to 7%).
People also translate
Compliance issue: methyl bromide consumption reduction commitment.
Dt2 Energy consumption reduction C. Insulation of building.
Compliance issue subject to review: HCFC andmethyl bromide consumption reduction commitments.
Halon consumption reduction commitment for 2009.
Implementation of fuel consumption reduction measures.
Dt1 Fuel consumption reduction A. Lower heating requirements in building.
Compliance issue subject to review:methyl bromide consumption reduction commitment decision XX/16.
Energy consumption reduction- on of the main tasks of the global society.
Compliance issues subject to review: CFC and methyl bromide consumption reduction and introduction of a ban on equipment using ODS.
Public lighting projects are proved successful andare the best starting point to demonstrate the possibilities for electricity consumption reduction.
Compliance issue: CFC consumption reduction commitment.
The Libyan Arab Jamahiriya had been included for consideration because of its CFC, halon andmethyl bromide consumption reduction commitments.
Methyl bromide consumption reduction commitment decision XVII/39.
The volume of credits granted to population has not reached the level of 2008, registering a decline in real terms by 66.4 percent,thus contributing to the consumption reduction.
Table 10: Deviation from consumption reduction schedules by Article 5 Parties in 2003.
We have to develop new technologies in the energy production, transportation andconsumption that will allow energy consumption reduction and minimize the carbon dioxide emissions.
Deviation from the consumption reduction schedules of the Protocol by Parties not operating under Article 5 was shown in table 9 of document UNEP/OzL. Pro/ImpCom/38/2.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines had submitted data for 2005,reporting CFC consumption of 1.028 ODP-tonnes, in advance of the consumption reduction commitment.
Implementation of its ozone-depleting substances consumption reduction commitments for that year therefore could not be confirmed.
Subsequent to 19 October 2005, the Secretariat received the following information andclarifications from non-Article 5 Parties related to deviations from consumption reduction schedules for the year 2004.
Table 8 below shows all cases of deviation from the consumption reduction schedules revealed by the data submitted by nonArticle 5 Parties for the year 2003 respectively.
Albania had not submitted its ozone-depletingsubstance data for 2007, thus its implementation of its ozone-depleting substance consumption reduction commitments for that year could not be confirmed.
That data placed the Party in advance of its methyl bromide consumption reduction commitment contained in decision XVII/34 for that year and maintained its progress toward compliance.
These data indicate that the Party is in advance of its commitment for halons contained in decision XX/19 and its consumption reduction obligations under the Montreal Protocol for CFCs and halons.
Those data were consistent with the Party's CFC consumption reduction commitment contained in decision XVIII/22, and revealed the Party to be in compliance with the CFC consumption control measures of the Protocol in 2006.