Examples of using Draft declaration should in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Decided that the draft declaration should.
The draft declaration should reflect the aspirations of the international community in the field of disarmament.
Decides that the draft Declaration should.
The Draft Declaration should be more concise, e.g., two pages with concrete objectives that could be achieved;
My delegation therefore believes that the draft declaration should include the following elements.
We consider that the draft declaration should be modified in such a way as to provide a more realistic and implementable basis for protecting the rights of indigenous peoples and other minorities.
One speaker indicated that the concept of responsibility as reflected in the Draft Declaration should be replaced by the concept of professionalism for journalists.
It suggested that the draft declaration should recognize the global scope of the problem and the need for a concerted global response.
One State noted that the declaration, while not legally binding, was"politically binding" on States andthat any rights recognized in the draft declaration should also be recognized in domestic legislation.
My delegation believes that the draft declaration should contain, in particular, the following elements.
The draft declaration should encompass such questions as the preservation of the cultural specificities of indigenous peoples, equal participation by them in the political and legislative processes, environmental protection and non-discrimination.
Those delegations considered that the draft declaration should be consistent with existing international law.
The draft declaration should stress that people who lived in poverty were quite capable of finding solutions to their problems when given the means to do so.
The Chairperson-Rapporteur stated that the draft declaration should be a consensual document containing a short and balanced text.
The draft declaration should be established on the basis of a level playing field mirroring the current international political and economic realities, which have blurred the previous stereotypical relationships between developed and developing countries and economies.
The representative of Chile expressed support for article 6, and said that the draft declaration should clearly spell out the term“distinct people” and bring it into line with article 1 of ILO Convention No. 169.
The draft declaration should also underscore the particularly adverse consequences of the arms race and the immense resources that it swallows up, which could be devoted, among other things, to development, the fight against poverty, disease and climate change.
She stressed that the only ground for proposing an amendment to the draft declaration should be that the proposal better reflected what was or ought to be the position of international law.
The draft declaration should be supplemented by a handbook on cooperation between the United Nations and regional organizations and by the holding of seminars on the subject, possibly as part of the activities planned to commemorate the fiftieth anniversary of the Organization.
There was wide consensus among delegations that human rights, peace and development were interdependent andmutually reinforcing, and that the draft declaration should be guided by the Charter of the United Nations, in addition to a vast jurisprudence inspired by international law.
They considered that, as the draft declaration should be seen as an effort to codify the right to peace, references to those declarations seemed essential.
KKRUA/Nepal unconditionally and fully supports the“Draft United Nations declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples” prepared and adopted by the Working Group on Indigenous Populations andexpresses its view that the draft declaration should be adopted as soon as possible within the second half of the International Decade.
He emphasized that the draft declaration should be adopted without any definition of“indigenous peoples”.
Her delegation had always stressed the need to classify ethnic groups in order to facilitate national policies on the rights of national minorities andindigenous people, and believed that the draft declaration should make a distinction between two categories of indigenous groups, those leading a tribal way of life on isolated reservations and those integrated with the rest of society.
It was agreed that the draft declaration should be sent to Member States for use in the preparation of their country papers to be presented to the World Summit, as they deemed appropriate.
The Chairman-Rapporteur noted that,as a result of the fruitful exchange of views, there was a common understanding that the draft declaration should be of universal application, and that an agreement on the question of definition was not necessary to continue the discussion of the draft declaration. .
She said that while ideally the draft declaration should be adopted before the end of the Decade, the priority should be a worthwhile text and that the extension of the working group on the draft declaration should be independent of any decision regarding the follow-up of the International Decade for the World's Indigenous People(1995- 2004) itself.
At the 18th meeting of the Preparatory Committee, it was agreed that the question of a draft declaration should be included on the agenda for future meetings of the Committee, pending resumption of meetings of the drafting group, which it was agreed would take place at the beginning of 1995.
It was generally stated that the draft declaration should be consistent with the existing body of international human rights law, be sufficiently precise to give rise to identifiable and practicable rights and obligations and attract broad international support.
It further decided that the draft declaration should be in three parts and the draft programme of action in five parts.