Examples of using New protocol should in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The goal for the new Protocol should likewise be universal ratification.
In his view, the phase of discussion and consideration had been concluded,the key issues were now well understood, and a new protocol should now be negotiated.
A new protocol should include an article specifically addressing the need for victim assistance.
Several delegations expressed the view that the discussion of whether to opt for an amended or a new protocol should be postponed until the details of the proposal were put on the table.
Negotiations on the new protocol should begin urgently and conclude at the earliest possible time.
It proposed that the scale of contributions should be adopted by the Executive Body together with the annual budget, andstressed that only Parties to the new protocol should be covered by such a scale of contributions.
A new protocol should include a clear stipulation of relevant international humanitarian law principles.
States parties should not, however,forget that the aim of the protocol was to reduce the humanitarian impact of such mines. The new protocol should therefore strengthen Amended Protocol II, not weaken it.
Any revision or new protocol should consider building more flexibility into some of the current annexes and obligations, e.g. with respect to timescales for the implementation of obligations.
Regarding the expansion of the scope of application,her delegation noted with appreciation the suggestion that a new protocol should designate the types of operations that posed risks by nature, rather than situations which were sometimes difficult to define.
Other delegations, whilst not ruling out the possibility of a protocol, said that a stronger case needed to be made if such an approach were to be pursued and,in the event of such an outcome, any new protocol should complement the 1951 Convention.
In that regard, the States parties to the new Protocol should undertake to devise effective machinery to provide technical and financial assistance to countries encountering difficulties in dealing with the problem of explosive remnants of war.
Unless an appropriate arrangement on that matter was worked out, many States lacking the relevant technological resources would be reluctant toaccept the obligations of a strengthened Protocol II, regardless of their humanitarian concerns. The new Protocol should also include a credible and effective verification mechanism for ensuring compliance.
Further agreed that any revision or new protocol should consider building more flexibility into some of the current and new annexes and obligations, e.g. with respect to timescales for the implementation of obligations;
At its twenty-fifth session,the Executive Body, decided that any revision or new protocol should consider setting new environmental targets for the current decade or longer e.g. to 2020.
The proposed new protocol should not be at odds with the spirit of that Convention, nor should it prescribe only a partial prohibition on cluster munitions or establish provisions that were confusing or incompatible with international humanitarian law.
Building upon the achievements of the Gothenburg Protocol, any revision or new protocol should consider setting new environmental targets for the current decade or longer(e.g. 2020), with the aim of ensuring further progress.
A number of countries have suggested that a new protocol should be drawn up to restrict the use of anti-vehicle mines. Russian experts have carefully studied these proposals. Some doubts have arisen as to whether anti-vehicle mines may be classified as a type of"inhumane" weapon.
At its twenty-fifth session, the Executive Body,agreed that any revision or new protocol should consider building more flexibility into some of the current and new annexes and obligations, e.g. with respect to timescales for the implementation of obligations.
To enable a cost-effective outcome, any revision or new protocol should take into account new scientific knowledge about primary PM and PM precursors, the hemispheric transport of air pollution and the potential synergies and trade-offs to climate change and the nitrogen cycle.
Based on the review of the Protocol, the Executive Body agreed that, to enable a cost-effective outcome, any revision or new protocol should take into account new scientific knowledge about primary particulate matter(PM) and PM precursors, the hemispheric transport of air pollution, the potential synergies and trade-offs with climate change and the nitrogen cycle.
Also decided that to enable a cost-effective outcome, any revision or new protocol should take into account new scientific knowledge about primary PM and PM precursors, the hemispheric transport of air pollution, and the potential synergies and trade-offs to climate change and the nitrogen cycle;
No new compliance system for the protocol should be developed.
From this perspective, we share the opinion that this new proposed additional protocol should be a balanced document, acceptable to all parties.
The adoption of a new text for the mines Protocol should be welcomed despite the instrument's inadequacies.
Provisions on implementation should cover all obligations under the new Protocol and therefore should be stipulated in a separate Article.
The protocol should be made a new global safeguards and verification standard and a condition of nuclear supply to non-nuclear-weapon States.
Egypt and Nigeria stated that an optional protocol should not create new substantive rights or derivatives of rights, while Madagascar cautioned against creating a hierarchy of rights.
New articles 1-3 of the draft Protocol should be grouped in a chapter entitled“Purpose, scope and criminal sanctions”;
All the participants in the Conference agreed that amended Protocol II, together with the new Protocol IV, should enter into force as soon as possible.