Examples of using Non-proliferation commitments in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Australia welcomes the non-proliferation commitments and efforts made to address those risks.
Australia deeply regrets that some countries have not seen fit to commit themselves to binding non-proliferation commitments.
While pursuing their non-proliferation commitments, nuclear-weapon States must simultaneously take steps towards disarmament.
All of the participants understood that national security and non-proliferation commitments were an overriding consideration.
Those Powers have pursued those policiesin utter disregard for international non-proliferation goals, and indeed their own non-proliferation commitments.
Any State tempted to violate its nuclear non-proliferation commitments needs to know it will be quickly detected and firmly confronted.
Those examples illustrate some of the practical ways in which New Zealand is implementing its non-proliferation commitments.
Algeria fully respected its non-proliferation commitments but was of the view that non-proliferation alone was incapable of averting the danger posed by nuclear weapons.
Brazil does not possess norhas it ever developed nuclear weapons, and has always fulfilled its nuclear non-proliferation commitments.
Organization of seminars andconferences for agencies of the central State Administration on the non-proliferation commitments made by Cuba and the legal norms regulating nuclear activities in the country;
They provide IAEA with the necessary enhanced means andauthority to verify that States comply with their non-proliferation commitments.
As far as non-proliferation commitments were concerned, France considered that only States that had entered into legally-binding international undertakings, such as accession to the NPT, and complied with them, should benefit from these security assurances.
The 2015 Review Conference should underline the importance of further promoting non-proliferation commitments, including by.
Nothing should be done to erode or weaken non-proliferation commitments under the Treaty, which we believe will strengthen confidence in the Treaty and enhance the attainment of international peace and security.
An expansion of the peaceful use of nuclear energy must be carried forward in a manner consistent with nuclear non-proliferation commitments and standards.
Any new non-proliferation commitments, including in terms of enhanced verification procedures, must be considered in the light of the Treaty's overall implementation, particularly with regard to the nuclear-weapon States' nuclear disarmament obligations.
Hence, we attach importance to the Proliferation Security Initiative as a practical means to uphold global non-proliferation commitments.
Highlights the IAEA's unique role in verifying States' compliance with their nuclear non-proliferation commitments and helping them, on request, to tighten up the security of nuclear materials and installations, and calls on States to support the Agency.
It is a major accomplishment andwill help build trust that all States comply with their non-proliferation commitments.
Therefore, in line with document GC(48)/RES/14, Indonesia calls upon all States having made non-proliferation commitments-- in particular those with significant nuclear activities-- to bring into force and implement the legal instruments of the strengthened safeguards system.
Mr. Yung Woo Chun(Republic of Korea): The nature of North Korea's non-compliance with the safeguards agreement and other non-proliferation commitments is well documented.
If the NPT were undermined, the momentum would be lost. Developing countries,the vast majority of which honoured their non-proliferation commitments, would find their security endangered and would find access to the technology which was necessary for their development more difficult.
At this point, it may be noted that the further nuclear disarmament proceeds,the stronger the interest will be in verifying that non-proliferation commitments are respected.
These include the critical need to address non-compliance by Iraq andNorth Korea with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty(NPT) and other non-proliferation commitments, the urgency of preventing acts of nuclear terrorism, and the continuing need to strengthen the international safeguards system.
In response to their aspirations,France has given security assurances to all non-nuclear-weapon States that comply with their non-proliferation commitments.
Consequently, nuclear exports should be denied only if the importing State breached its non-proliferation commitments and the breach was confirmed by IAEA.
It will also be beneficial for those States not parties to the NPT, as they will be seen, if not full fledged,as acting as responsible members of the international community in regards to their disarmament and non-proliferation commitments.
However, this can only be achieved if all States, nuclear and non-nuclear alike,are prepared to abide by their disarmament and non-proliferation commitments and to nurture an international climate conducive to disarmament.
If there is to be any responsibility for this, then that responsibility lies with those countries which have, for the sake of profit, andfor great Power politics, undertaken policies in violation of their own international non-proliferation commitments.
Ukraine calls upon the Democratic People's Republic of Korea to renew its implementation of the Treaty and to follow its non-proliferation commitments, taken in the framework of the Treaty.