Examples of using Notes should in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Briefing notes should provide.
The Indicators and Additional Notes should be removed.
These notes should be removed from the final questionnaire.
Mr. Mitrović(Serbia and Montenegro)proposed that explanatory notes should be produced by the Secretariat.
Perhaps the draft Notes should become a supplement to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules.
For this purpose, for taxable years beginning before 1 January 2007, interest on the Notes should generally constitute“passive income”, or in the case of certain U.S.
All briefing notes should be approved by senior officials in accordance with the procedures of the ministry.
Other views were expressed that confidentiality was a key feature of international commercial arbitration and that the Notes should retain that principle as expressed in the first sentence of paragraph 31.
The Notes should be of a general nature so that they could be used in both public and private arbitration.
Explanatory notes, should be deleted.
These notes should be read in conjunction with the guiding principles set out in Chapters II and III, which have general application, in particular the need to consider quantitative data in conjunction with qualitative information.
Mr. HUNTER(United Kingdom) agreed that the draft Notes should encourage parties to consider the need for an agreement on confidentiality.
The draft Notes should state in broader terms that the issue of confidentiality could be dealt with expressly by the parties or covered in the applicable arbitral rules, but that in the absence of a specific arbitral rule, parties should not assume that the obligation of confidentiality was implied.
The Working Group agreed that the Notes should be circulated to Governments for comment prior to its thirty-sixth session in 2009.
The draft Notes should perhaps also reflect the fact that insolvency practitioners were drafting ever more sophisticated agreements with the expectation that they might not require court approval.
After discussion, it was agreed that the Notes should highlight the existence and usage of such tools, doing so in a neutral and non-directive way.
Information notes should be regularly submitted to each treaty body session about the activities of relevant special procedures mandates;
The Working Group agreed that paragraph 53 of the Notes should differentiate between the issue of authenticity of documents, and the organization of documentary evidence.
The footnotes and notes should be treated as integral parts of the tables; they describe the projections used by each Party and explain any changes or calculations made by the secretariat and in updates based on the IDRs.
The Working Group confirmed its understanding that the Notes should retain those characteristics and that the purpose of the Notes should not be to promote any practice as best practice.
A suggestion was made that the Notes should be clear as to the fact that holding a meeting or hearing at a location different from the legal place of arbitration was not an automatic decision, but rather, that such a decision might be made in certain circumstances in relation to factors relevant to that meeting or hearing.
The differences between them is that the notes should objectively reference purposes, they give a brief statement, the source, suggest translating foreign language text, report any dodatkovriy fact; comments publikovantih offer interpretations of texts expressing opinion originator(commentator) or editor and their attitudes to the published material.
As a general rule, these briefing notes should contain the most recent information available and should be provided to Council members in a timely fashion, without needing to cover all United Nations field operations in instances when no important developments have occurred in some of them, or material from some missions is delayed.
A proposal was made that in such an instance, the Notes should advise that parties select, or that an arbitral tribunal should advise parties to select, arbitration rules, and that the Notes should enumerate the advantage of selecting rules to govern proceedings rather than proceeding ad hoc see also para. 49 below.
The Note should read.
Special note should be taken of.
This note should be read in conjunction with the report of the expert meeting FCCC/SBSTA/2002/2.
This note should be read together with documents FCCC/KP/AWG/2009/INF.1 and FCCC/KP/AWG/2009/INF.2.
The data provided in this note should, therefore, be viewed as preliminary.
Note should be taken of the commitment to Tokelau's development process demonstrated by New Zealand.