Examples of using Simplification should in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
Simplification should be the first underlying priority for the next CAP reform.
The Commission shares the view that simplification should not hamper the principles of sound financial management.
Simplification should result in more clarity in eligibility, audit, payments, and use of ICT.
The efforts of the Commission toimprove simplification for beneficiaries are commendable, but simplification should not be carried out without the participation of end beneficiaries.
Nevertheless, simplification should be the first underlying priority for the next reform.
Regrets that the new simplified cost options are only used for a marginal part of rural development spending andthat they are not enhancing the potential of this source of funding, although simplification should be a way to encourage beneficiaries to engage in projects;
The Court considers that simplification should not hamper the principles of sound financial manage- ment.
Simplification should increase respect for EU legislation and, in the process, reinforce its legitimacy.
A simplification of the concepts and methods used for the purpose of determining origin,including the wording of the corresponding provisions; such simplification should improve clarity, aid comprehension of the rules and support their application and enforcement; the impact of such a simplification should be fully assessed to ensure that the overall objectives are met and, if not, the Commission will adopt a different approach.
Simplification should be closely linked to vigorous enforcement of decided measures to avoid social dumping.
Finally, it should be noted that simplification should be pursued not only in the definition of the rules but also in their application.
Simplification should not lead to calling into question the policy decisions that have been taken over the years in the CAP.
The transparency resulting from this simplification should provide more efficiency in the implementation, in terms of transposition and compliance with the objectives.
Simplification should result in a high quality regulatory framework, easier to understand and more"user friendly".
In addition, simplification should apply not just to customs procedures, but also to future trading arrangements.
Simplification should first and foremost benefit partner countries and regions but will also allow for more efficient management, through the reduction of administrative burden.
Some administrative simplification should also result from the need to transpose only one Directive instead of two.
Genuine simplification should allow greater access to funds both for the local communities and small organisations that need them.
Administrative simplification should not lead to an overall reduction of the data controllers' responsibility in ensuring effective data protection.
This simplification should reduce the errors linked to co-financing rates set at project level, which occurred in previous programming periods.
We consider that simplification should also go hand in hand with an increased focus on performance, cost-efficiency and quality of regulation and administrative formalities.
More simplification should also result from introducing, where the relevant conditions are in place, a sector-based approach to the allocation of assistance for those sectors.
The rapporteur believes that simplification should not mean reinventing the standards, but rather making the existing rules clearer and making it easier for fishermen to apply them.
Simplification should improve clarity, aid comprehension of the rules and support their application and enforcement and boost development impact within and between regional trade blocs.
As the Court has also emphasised, simplification should be applied alongside the principles of clarity of objectives, realism, transparency and accountability when revising or reforming the arrangements for EU spending.
This simplification should benefit farmers, enabling them to concentrate on producing safe, quality food, and also the national and EU authorities, by reducing the bureaucratic burden associated with implementing the CAP.
However, this simplification should not apply in case of a new prospective member from a third country or overseas territory in order to enable all participating Member States to check whether such accession is in line with its public interest or public policy.
Stresses, however, that such a simplification should respect Parliament's right of scrutiny and the development effectiveness principles, and that EU development funding should retain its fundamental objective of poverty eradication, focusing in particular on LDCs and fragile contexts;
Considers that such simplification should be carried through once all practical arrangements to implement the new IIA in its entirety are in place, at which point the institutions could also evaluate whether adjustments to the new IIA may be necessary in light of experience gained up until that point in time with the implementation of the new IIA;