Examples of using Average reader in English and their translations into Slovenian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Computer
-
Official/political
-
Programming
Not for the average reader.
The average reader doesn't speak this language.
But also for the average reader.
The average reader reads about two words per second.
It is easy to understand for the average reader.
Nothing that the average reader would notice.
It's still understandable for the average reader.
This reason the average reader does not understand him.
Yes, but it's accessible even to the average reader.
The average reader can read somewhere around 6 words per second.
This article was far too concise for the average reader.
Do not write for the“average reader:” all readers are average. .
The success I will writeabout might be more compelling to the average reader of this article.
It is not clear to the average reader how this data collection is covered by Facebook's privacy policy.
There are inline cleanup tags to flag specificwording that is likely to be confusing to the average reader.
A description of the nature of thesupport that is sufficiently complete to enable the average reader to form an understanding of the nature of the support.
The basic thought is supported by arguments- a minimum of three or a maximum of five,as otherwise these cannot be processed simultaneously by an average reader.
For the average reader it is a construct with a set of significances which he no more thinks of examining than did his pious forebear of the thirteenth century….
Even a scientific phenomenon from thefield of linguistics may be surprising to the average reader, and entertaining.
Namely, an average reader of the weekly Mladina might not have read or known of the content of the text articles, therefore he or she did not necessarily link them with the photographs in the satirical section and vice versa.
If the sale of a book is not being limited to just modern book reviewers and experts on modern poetry, but falls into the hands of the general public,that is to say, the average reader, this court should take that into consideration in determining whether or not"Howl" is obscene.
The average reader may be tempted to linger too long on certain details, such as the light in the sky, falling to the ground, the voice that called him, his new condition of blindness, his healing like scales falling from his eyes and the fast that he made.
Regardless of the complainant's attempt to present such statement as merely one of disapproval and criticism of the substance of the plaintiff's speech,the Constitutional Court nevertheless holds that the average reader would understand the disputable article as the journalist's assessment that the plaintiff is of low intelligence, has poor personal characteristics, and is therefore incapable of carrying out any demanding work.
The average reader, perhaps, might be tempted to pause too long on certain details, such as the light from the sky, the fall to the ground, the voice that called, the new state of blindness, the curing when something like scales fall from his eyes and the fasting.
The majority decision confirms the complainant's claim that from the viewpoint of an average reader the disputed publication cannot have the meaning of a side-by-side comparison with the Goebbels couple as regards the horrifying historical fact concerning the death of their children.
The average reader can hardly hope to find any fact in a sectarian publication under all its aspects, pro and con, for either one way or the other its presentation is sure to be biassed, and the scales helped to incline to that side to which its editor's special policy is directed.
The Higher Court did not question itself as to the perception of the average reader of the most commonly understood and central meaning of the message, or the applications addressed to courts when, objectively speaking, it is possible to recognise many meanings in a disputed publication.
Even if an average reader was not aware of the comparison of the two families in all its horrifying proportions(as the Supreme Court attributed to such a reader with regard to the murder of the Goebbels children by their parents), he or she was certainly aware of the comparison between the Grims family and the Goebbels family.
Nevertheless, in view of the respect the average reader has been brought up in for exact science, even that short Past would remain meaningless, unless the esoteric teachings were corroborated and supported on the spot- whenever possible- by references to historical names of a so-called historical period.