Examples of using Structural surplus in English and their translations into Slovenian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Computer
-
Official/political
-
Programming
The Commission's claim that structural surpluses are increasing should be checked.
The programme confirms the previous medium term objective(MTO) of a structural surplus of 0.5%.
In this context, a structural surplus of production has been a constant feature of the European wine market over the last decades.
The grubbing-up scheme has resulted in areduction of supply in line with the aim of reducing the structural surplus.
It is planned that the medium-term budgetary objective- a structural surplus of 0,25% of GDP- is to be achieved by 2020.
(c)action should be taken more promptly to react to potential oractual risks of market distortion(structural surpluses).
The structural surplus is estimated at about 15 million hl of wine, which is equivalent to about 8.4% of EU‑27 wine production.
Closing the sustainability gap would mean turning this deficit into a structural surplus of about 1½% of GDP.
That is the primary structural surplus that Greece needs, and debt restructuring would not solve this very fundamental fact.
However, the Fiscal Council assesses that, in order to achieve this objective,the creation of structural surpluses will also be necessary after 2021.
Achieve structural surplus by 2013 at the latest, while limiting deficit in 2012 to at most 2,1% of GDP, keeping tight control over expenditure and enhancing the efficiency of public spending.
Greater solidarity is needed from countries with structural surpluses which should contribute more extensively to expansionary policies.
The need to fix this price at a level which contributes towards stabilizing market prices without, however,leading to the formation of structural surpluses within the Community.
The programme confirms the previous medium-term objective of a structural surplus, which is more stringent than what the Stability and Growth Pact requires.
Let us recall that in the final analysis, fiscal solvency requires stabilising and then reducing the government debt ratio-i.e. achieving a primary structural surplus and achieving a debt-stabilising level.
Based on the Commission 2016 spring forecast, the structural surplus is projected to decrease to 1.4% of GDP in 2016 and further to 0.3% of GDP in 2017, thereby remaining above the medium-term budgetary objective.
The market mechanism measures, such as crisis distillation,have proved cost-inefficient to the extent that they have encouraged structural surpluses without requiring improvements in the relevant competitive structures.
This requires addressing the structural surplus expected to remain in place even with other possible measures after 2020 in the context of the 2030 framework(i.e. revision of the linear reduction factor, use of international credits, extension of the scope).
Some market mechanism measures haveproved cost-inefficient to the extent that they have encouraged structural surpluses without requiring improvements in the relevant competitive structures.
This is the area corresponding to the part of the structural surplus to be eliminated taking into account the recent trade improvements together with the positive effects on market balance expected from the other measures proposed, in particular the end of enrichment with sugar, promotion, green harvesting and Rural Development support.
According to the Commission forecast, which does not take intoaccount the most recently announced measures, the structural surplus is estimated to decline to 0.6% of GDP in 2014 and turn to a deficit of 1.3% of GDP in 2015.
While this is a significant step forward, the structural surplus will remain well into the trading period after 2020(phase 4) in the absence of further measures to reform the ETS, and this is expected to continue to erode its role as a technology neutral, cost-effective and EU-wide driver for low-carbon investment.
However, in its stability programme,Luxembourg announces that the medium-term budgetary objective will change from a structural surplus of 0.5% of GDP until 2016 to a structural deficit of 0.5% of GDP as from 2017.
Indeed, the evaluation considered that the effectiveness of the measure in terms of market regulation was doubtful since, on the one hand in some cases a proportion of the products withdrawn from Community stocks returned indirectly back to intervention and, on the other hand, the measure was considerably moreexpensive than export refunds as a method of reducing the structural surplus.
While the medium-term objective(MTO), set by the Finnish authorities of a structural surplus of 0.5% of GDP, is projected to be achieved in 2011, in the following years, the structural balance is set to fall below the target.
The(recalculated11) structural balance is set to improve only by around 0.35% of GDP per year, below the required 0.6% of GDP, between 2016 and 2020,and the medium-term budgetary objective- a structural surplus of 0.25% of GDP- is not expected to be achieved within the time horizon of the programme.
(46) The main purpose of the milk quota system of reducing the imbalance between supply and demand onthe respective market and the resulting structural surpluses, thereby achieving a better market equilibrium, appeared to reduce market orientation because it distorted farmers' response to price signals and prevented efficiency gains in the sector by slowing down restructuring.
The decision to end the transitional prohibition on planting vines at Union level is justified by the attainment of the main objectives of the reform of the Union wine market organisation in 2008,in particular by the end of the long-standing structural surplus of wine production and the progressive improvement of competitiveness and market orientation of the wine sector in the Union.
As already highlighted in the Report on the State of the European Carbon Market in 2012(Carbon Market Report)3, however, back-loading leads to a rebound in the surplus in 2019 and 2020 andhence does not affect the average size of the structural surplus of over 1.8 billion allowances in phase 3, peaking at 2.6 billion allowances in 2020(see Figure 1).