Examples of using Structural surplus in English and their translations into Polish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Programming
-
Computer
Structural surpluses should be avoided thanks to the price mechanism.
Objective: To absorb 15000 tonnes of organic nitrogen in areas with a structural surplus.
The Commission's claim that structural surpluses are increasing should be checked.
Closing the sustainability gap would mean turning this deficit into a structural surplus of about 1½% of GDP.
The structural surplus is estimated at about 15 million hl of wine, which is equivalent to about 8.4% of EU-27 wine production.
The term"overproduction" is reminiscent of the structural surpluses of the old CAP.
In this context, a structural surplus of production has been a constant feature of the European wine market over the last decades.
Title: Aid to facilities for treating livestock manure in areas with a structural surplus.
In particular, the medium-term objective of a structural surplus is expected to be maintained in 2014.
The grubbing-up scheme has resulted in a reduction of supply in line with the aim of reducing the structural surplus.
Corrected for the temporary higher revenues in 2005 the structural surplus is broadly unchanged from 2005 to 2006.
First introduced in 1984 at a time when EUproduction far outstripped demand, the quota regime was one of the tools introduced for overcoming these structural surpluses.
The government plans to remain at the medium-term objective- a structural surplus of 0.5% of GDP- throughout the programme period.
The structural surplus has disappeared, and the favourable development of internal demand is reflected not only in prices but also by steadily increasing imports and lower exports.
The programme confirms the previous medium term objective(MTO) of a structural surplus of 0.5.
Achieve structural surplus by 2013 at the latest, while limiting deficit in 2012 to at most 2.1% of GDP in 2012, keeping tight control over expenditure and enhancing the efficiency of public spending.
The authorities set the medium-term objective(MTO) for the budgetary position at a structural surplus of 0,5% of GDP and aim at achieving this position by 2007.
Real estate structural surplus pattern still exists, 1-11 data show that in 2015 the real estate investment growth rate down to 1.3%, the leading indicators of real estate new construction area, land acquisition area dropped.
The programme does not foresee the achievement of the Medium Term Objective(hereinafter MTO),which is defined as a structural surplus of 0.5% of GDP, within the 2011-2014 programming period.
Over the programme period, the structural surplus(i.e. the cyclically-adjusted balance net of one-off and other temporary measures) calculated according to the commonly agreed methodology is planned to decline on average by 0,1% of GDP per year.
Commission services' recalculations on the basis of the information in the programme according to the commonly agreed methodology give a structural surplus of 2% of GDP in 2009.
While the medium-term objective(MTO), set by the Finnish authorities of a structural surplus of 0.5% of GDP, is projected to be achieved in 2011, in the following years, the structural balance is set to fall below the target.
The objective of the budgetary strategy outlined in the 2014 Convergence Programme is to reach the medium-term objective by 2015 and to achieve a structural surplus of 0.9% of GDP at the end of the programme in 2017.
This requires addressing the structural surplus expected to remain in place even with other possible measures after 2020 in the context of the 2030 framework i.e. revision of the linear reduction factor, use of international credits, extension of the scope.
According to the Commission forecast, which does not take into account the most recently announced measures, the structural surplus is estimated to decline to 0.6% of GDP in 2014 and turn to a deficit of 1.3% of GDP in 2015.
The programme projects the structural surplus to reach around 1,5% of GDP by the end of the programme period[3], which can be regarded as the programme's MTO as it is in line with the principles for MTOs specified in the Stability and Growth Pact and the code of conduct.
However, in its stability programme,Luxembourg announces that the medium-term budgetary objective will change from a structural surplus of 0.5% of GDP until 2016 to a structural deficit of 0.5% of GDP as from 2017.
While this is a significant step forward, the structural surplus will remain well into the trading period after 2020(phase 4) in the absence of further measures to reform the ETS, and this is expected to continue to erode its role as a technology neutral, cost-effective and EU-wide driver for low-carbon investment.
The objective of the budgetary strategy outlined in the programme is to ensure sustainable fiscal policy that supports balanced growth, by achieving a structural surplus while ensuring sufficient fiscal buffers and reducing the tax burden on labour.
This is the area corresponding to the part of the structural surplus to be eliminated taking into account the recent trade improvements together with the positive effects on market balance expected from the other measures proposed, in particular the end of enrichment with sugar, promotion, green harvesting and Rural Development support.