Examples of using Wrongful act in English and their translations into Spanish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Wrongful act causing death.
Internationally wrongful act of that organization 286.
Wrongful act of another State.
If anyone exceeds this, he will commit a wrongful act.”.
Wrongful act by an international organization.
People also translate
There is an internationally wrongful act of a State when.
Any type of claim based on Negligence,recklessness or an intentional wrongful act.
There is an internationally wrongful act of a State under international law when.
The tribunal observed that a seizure, by itself,is not an internationally wrongful act.
In one scenario,a State which had committed an internationally wrongful act could be recalcitrant and unresponsive.
Substituting for“international crimes” the notion of“exceptionally serious wrongful act”.
There is an internationally wrongful act of an international organization when conduct consisting of an action or omission.
The only obligation to be placed on the protecting State was that it must allege an internally wrongful act.
An analytical process designed to determine whether a wrongful act has occurred and, if so, the persons or entities responsible.
We consider that this is a matter that is relevant to the issue of the"gravity" of the initial wrongful act.
The article would then read:"The legal consequences of an internationally wrongful act of a State… are without prejudice to the provisions of the Charter.
First, causation will not be established in law when the event is too‘remote' from the defendant's wrongful act.
If a State commits an internationally wrongful act-- for example, by torturing an alien-- it incurs international responsibility from that moment.
The main issue of principle was whether the notion of a continuing wrongful act should be retained.
Theoretically, international institutions, unlike States,were not endowed with power to redress a wrongful act.
It seems clear that it includes the underlying dispute over the(alleged)internationally wrongful act, i.e. the dispute which has led to the taking of countermeasures.
Thus it is necessary to take examples both of systematic andnon-systematic primary rules in order to test the idea of a“composite wrongful act”.
The conduct that the responsible international organization should take in order to cease the wrongful act, if it is continuing;
However, the word"flowing" was considered somewhat unclear, anda preference was expressed for the wording"reparation for all the consequences of that wrongful act.
Thus, it is our view, in light of these considerations,that the countermeasures proposed are not disproportionate to the initial wrongful act to which they are intended to respond.
Restitution is the first of the forms of reparation laid down andinvolves the re-establishment of the situation existing before the internationally wrongful act.
Of course, the State taking the countermeasures ran the risk of incurring responsibility itself if it later transpired that no wrongful act had been committed.
Article 27 should cover only those cases where theassistance is clearly and unequivocally connected to the subsequent wrongful act.
Furthermore, the focus of the draft articles currently under consideration might be shifted from the issue of responsibility to that of committing a wrongful act.
The United States believes that article16 should cover only those cases where"the assistance is clearly and unequivocally connected to the subsequent wrongful act" ibid., para. 178.