Examples of using Joint implementation in English and their translations into Thai
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Joint Implementation Committee.
Establishing the joint implementation committee.
The joint implementation committee is responsible for endorsing the methodology.
Activities of the joint implementation committee.
Preparing national position papers and other documents for the joint implementation committee.
Annex on the joint implementation committee.
See the section of VPA Unpacked on the annex on the joint implementation committee.
Annual reports of joint implementation committees may provide information on.
Publication of annual reports by a joint implementation committee.
Forming a joint implementation committee can take quite some time after negotiations end.
Annual reports of the joint implementation committee.
Each joint implementation committee has a particular dynamic and set of participants invited to join meetings.
The functions of implementing structures, such as the joint implementation committee.
Publishing records of joint implementation committee discussions and the committee's annual reports.
Respond to requests from and inform decisions by the VPA joint implementation committees.
The annex also provides a VPA joint implementation committee with a basis for creating a work plan and monitoring progress.
Some VPA partner countries have different names for the joint implementation committee.
Participation may take the form of representation on joint implementation committees and national structures set up to implement a VPA and/or monitor impacts.
During the debate, the participants exchanged views on the key issues of the EU-CA cooperation agenda and its joint implementation.
Reports: Single report, which the joint implementation committee will review and then publish.
Clarify technical aspects of the VPA, such as legality assurance systems, transparency objectives and joint implementation committees.
Auditors reports may identify ways for a VPA's joint implementation committee to improve a timber legality assurance system.
To date, all countries that have signed VPAs have included representatives of civil society and the private sector in national implementation structures and joint implementation committees.
In many VPA processes, therefore, the parties have created an interim joint implementation committee to provide oversight in the period between signing and ratifying a VPA.
In some countries, joint implementation committees have become platforms for stakeholders to raise governance issues related to forests that are not embedded in the VPA.
Grievance mechanisms. VPAs set out mechanisms to resolve complaints and conflict. For instance, all VPAs make provision for stakeholders to raise issues with joint implementation committees by writing to both the EU and authorities in the VPA partner country. Joint implementation committees discuss matters raised at meetings. Some VPAs also make special reference to whistle-blowers.
Experiences to date show that negotiating and implementing Voluntary Partnership Agreements(VPAs) deliver tangible achievements. The VPA text and annexes describe outputs that parties commit to realising. Other achievements result from the process itself. The annual reports of VPA joint implementation committees describe how each VPA contributes to such achievements, which can include the following.
Some VPA processes have created an interim joint implementation committee to bridge the gap between the end of negotiations and the ratification of the VPA by both parties.
Also, bilateral meetings, which often mobilise stakeholders and structure activities in the VPA negotiation phase, are less frequent in the implementation phase. To help address the problem of delays in forming joint implementation committees, the EU and VPA partner country may create an interim joint implementation committee as soon as negotiations end. Interim committees mean that official meetings can continue to take place and mobilise stakeholders.
Liberia. After VPA negotiations ended, the national negotiating team evolved into the Liberia Implementation Committee. This committee meets mainly to prepare for joint implementation committee meetings. Members represent government ministries and agencies, private sector and civil society organisations. A broader National Multistakeholder Monitoring Committee also provides input to the joint implementation committee. The 26 members include members of the Liberia Implementation Committee and representatives of government agencies, civil society, the private sector and communities.