Voorbeelden van het gebruik van Contested aid in het Engels en hun vertalingen in het Nederlands
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Computer
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Programming
According to the applicant, when the contested aid was granted, small orders were not defined.
including the contested aid.
In this case, it is common ground that the contested aid was not notified in 1988 or in the following years.
In the further alternative, annul the last sentence of Article 1 of the contested decision in so far as it declares the contested aid compatible before 1 November 1993;
Finally, the Commission established that the contested aid did not overcompensate the costs of processing of small orders.
alleging a manifest error of assessment in the examination of the compatibility of the contested aid, must be upheld.
The first part of the third plea alleges that the contested aid is discriminatory,
by ordering repayment of the contested aid, could have infringed Salzgitter's legal certainty.
The applicant submits that the contested aid is totally unrelated to small orders
In the alternative, annul the last sentence of Article 1 of the contested decision in so far as the Commission declared the contested aid compatible before 1999 or, alternatively, 1997 or 1994;
It is therefore difficult to assess the contested aid by considering it in isolation,
which entered into force on 1 November 1993, the contested aid could have been declared compatible with the common market only with effect from that date.
That is particularly so in the present case, since the contested aid was awarded and granted by the French Republic
It must be pointed out that the Commission calculated the costs directly associated with processing small orders on the basis of explanations provided to it by the French Republic in the procedure in which the contested aid was examined.
The only subsidy which is the subject of the present case(‘the contested aid') was granted on an annual basis from 1980, although the amount of the subsidy varied as of.
It is in the light of those principles that it is necessary to consider whether the applicant has succeeded in demonstrating that the contested decision is vitiated by a manifest error of assessment as regards the examination of whether the contested aid is compatible with the common market.
It is apparent from the last sentence of Article 1 of the contested decision that the contested aid was declared compatible with the common market under Article 87(3)(d) EC.
The contested aid consisted of a package of annual subsidies, each of which was specifically intended to offset the extra costs incurred each year in handling orders from booksellers established abroad to
It is therefore necessary only to examine whether the contested aid had become definitively compatible or incompatible at the
did not invalidate the above conclusions as to the possible effect of the contested aid on the competitive position of Community undertakings in the sector concerned.
Secondly, it verified that the justification for the contested aid was genuine, namely that there were extra costs directly associated with the processing of small orders.
was not such as to call into question the proportionate nature of the contested aid, since the financial incidence of the switch of teletransmitted orders
Finally, it took the view that the contested aid had a cultural objective for the purpose of Article 87(3)(d)
Since no consistent method of calculation was used, the contested aid should be regarded as an operating subsidy, granted irrespective of the extra costs incurred in processing small orders.
the Commission adopted a new decision declaring the contested aid compatible with the common market(Decision 1999/133/EC concerning State aid in favour of CELF) OJ 1999 L 44, p. 37.
It follows from the foregoing that the Commission erred in law in considering that the contested aid was compatible with the common market under Article 87(3)(d)
The Commission gives a detailed explanation of why‘[t]he compatibility of the contested unlawful aid with the common market must be examined in the light of Article 4(c)[CS] and the relevant Steel Aid Codes.
As the European Airbus company considerably increased its sales in 1987, the American authorities contested the aid granted by European governments to the Air bus programme,