Примеры использования Board of trustees recommended на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Board of Trustees recommended 12 travel grants and 47 project grants.
In the light of the selection criteria, the Board of Trustees recommended 33 project grants for a total amount of $269,200.
The Board of Trustees recommended that projects be selected based on the quality of the project, geographical distribution, type of assistance provided and gender balance.
In order to enhance the effectiveness of the secretariat andreduce its workload, the Board of Trustees recommended developing a directory of past beneficiaries of the Fund.
At its fourteenth session, the Board of Trustees recommended the establishment of a fellowship programme for members of human rights organizations, notably those working on contemporary forms of slavery.
Люди также переводят
Given the large number of applications to review during the session and the lack of time for full treatment of substantive issues(revision of guidelines,fund-raising, etc.), the Board of Trustees recommended, as it had done at its preceding session(A/50/512, para. 39), that the General Assembly should approve the extension of its annual session to a maximum of 10 days.
The Board of Trustees recommended that the catalysing role of the Institute, its networking capacity and its ability to mobilize much larger institutions should be better explained to Member States and potential donors.
Through the aforementioned report of the Director of UNIDIR, the Board of Trustees recommended continuation of a subvention from the United Nations regular budget.
The Board of Trustees recommended that its Chairman should visit the Medical Foundation of London to meet its directors and, with them, organize a meeting with the various organizations receiving grants from the Fund that are based in the United Kingdom.
Seriously concerned with the staffing situation, at its nineteenth session, the Board of Trustees recommended that the post of Director be filled as quickly as possible to provide the necessary leadership within INSTRAW for its revitalization.
The Board of Trustees recommended that the practice be continued of requesting beneficiaries to report on activities they had undertaken while attending a given session and to provide information on any follow-up activities organized upon their return home.
At its fifteenth session in 2002, the Board of Trustees recommended that the deadline for the submission of application forms should be 1 October 2002.
The Board of Trustees recommended that the secretariat explore the possibility of developing a database containing relevant information on grants and beneficiaries, including information on their indigenous communities, the beneficiaries themselves and their respective organizations.
During its twenty-fourth session, the Board of Trustees recommended that a video be produced on the impact of the participation of the people to whom the Fund had made grants.
The Board of Trustees recommended that 109 grants be made from the Fund in 60 countries for the partial funding of 106 projects to relieve the suffering of the tens of thousands of victims by obtaining for them medical or psychological support, opportunities for social or economic reintegration, and legal or financial assistance involving expenditures of approximately $2.6 million for 1994.
In light of the selection criteria, the Board of Trustees recommended 71 project grants for a total amount of US$ 733,109 which will assist 71 non-governmental organizations in 45 countries.
The Board of Trustees recommended that either the Chair or another member of the Board continue to represent the Board at sessions of the Permanent Forum and the Expert Mechanism and attend the sessions of the Human Rights Council at which indigenous peoples' issues are addressed to give an update on the implementation of the mandate of the Fund and other developments.
In light of the selection criteria, the Board of Trustees recommended 47 project grants for a total amount of US$ 590,300 which will assist NGOs in 22 countries in Africa, the Americas, Asia and Europe see chart of project grants attached as annex III.
The Board of Trustees recommended 45 grants for representatives of indigenous organizations and communities to attend the Working Group on Indigenous Populations and 10 grants for representatives of indigenous organizations and communities authorized to attend the Working Group of the Commission on Human Rights to review the Draft United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
In the light of the selection criteria, the Board of Trustees recommended 20 project grants for a total amount of US$ 150,700 which will assist NGOs in 15 countries in Africa, the Americas, Asia and Europe see annex III.
Although the Board of Trustees recommended at its fifteenth session in 2002 that, in order to be able to review and adopt recommendations on all admissible applications in time, an additional session of three days should be envisaged at the end of February 2003 to discuss the allocation of travel grants for the Forum, it was not possible in 2003, as it had been possible in 2002, to organize this additional session in time.
At its fifteenth session in 2002, the Board of Trustees recommended that a special session be held, from 24 to 26 February 2003, to approve applications for travel grants to attend the second session of the Permanent Forum which was scheduled to be held in May 2003.
The Board of Trustees recommended that the Bureau of the Permanent Forum at its first session in May 2002 should invite the Chairperson, or any other member of the Board or the secretariat of the Board and Fund who could be in New York during the session, to deliver a statement introducing the new mandate given to the Fund by the General Assembly in its resolution 56/140 of 19 December 2001 and providing information on its implementation.
During its March 1997 session, the UNITAR Board of Trustees recommended that the catalysing role of the Institute, its networking capacity and its ability to mobilize much larger institutions should be better explained to Member States and potential donors.
The Board of Trustees recommended that either the Chair or another member of the Board continue to represent the Board at sessions of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues and the Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and also attend those sessions of the Human Rights Council at which indigenous peoples' issues are addressed, to give an update on the implementation of the mandate of the Fund and other developments.
In particular, in its 2013 report(A/68/206), the Board of Trustees recommended that the Secretary-General commission a study on emerging technologies, with an emphasis on increasingly autonomous weapon technologies, with UNIDIR undertaking a research role.
The Board of Trustees recommended that, whenever possible, beneficiaries of the Fund contact the OHCHR field presences and the United Nations Development Programme to seek assistance and explore cooperation opportunities, including for follow-up activities in relation to the implementation of the recommendations of the Human Rights Council, including the universal periodic review mechanism and the special procedures, and the human rights treaty bodies.
At its tenth session, in March 2005, the Board of Trustees recommended 25 project grants for an amount of US$ 215,330 and 7 travel grants for an amount of US$ 14,800 to allow representatives of NGOs to participate in the thirtieth session of the Working Group, which took place in Geneva in June 2005 for detailed information on these recommendations, including a list of beneficiaries of grants, see A/60/273.
Since grants requested do not match grants awarded(see table below), the Board of Trustees recommends each year that none of the amounts available in addition to the compulsory reserve should be carried forward for the following year see A/53/283, para. 11.
By means of the present report, the Board of Trustees recommends that the subvention level be increased(in addition to being cost adjusted) in the biennium 2012-2013 in order-- at minimum-- to meet the costs of the Director and core staff of the Institute.