Примеры использования Claims of violations на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Claims of violations of women's rights.
In his subsequent submissions the author added claims of violations of article 14, paragraphs 1 and 2.
It refers to the Committee's case law in which it indicated that it does not entertain abstract or unsupported claims of violations.
It considers, however,that the two cases and the claims of violations of the Convention contained therein are fundamentally different.
As to the children,the forthcoming decision of the Family Court does not detract from their claims of violations to date.
Люди также переводят
As to the claims of violations of articles 10 and 11, the State party submits that neither of these claims has been substantiated by the complainant.
The Committee notes the State party's submission that the author did not substantiate his claims of violations of his rights under articles 23 and 24 of the Covenant.
At the same time, we maintain that the claims of violations of article 14, paragraphs 2 and 3, and article 15 should have been declared inadmissible rationae materiae.
The State party has an obligation, under article 2, paragraph 3, of the Covenant, to make the remedies in the Constitutional Court, provided for under Section 14(1) of the Trinidadian Constitution, available andeffective in relation to claims of violations of Covenant rights.
What that meant was that individual States could be enabled to register claims of violations based solely on their own private, non-transparent sources.
As to the claims of violations of articles 6; 7; and 9, paragraph 1, of the Covenant, these should be declared inadmissible for lack of sufficient substantiation, pursuant to article 2 of the Optional Protocol and rule 96(b) of the Committee's rules of procedure.
The fifty-fourth session of the General Assembly adopted the Optional Protocol of the Convention[allowing women to submit claims of violations of the rights protected under the Convention to the Committee] which up to today has been signed by 37 States.
As to the claims of violations of articles 10 and 11, the Committee notes that the complainant has failed to provide any arguments or information to substantiate such claims and thus is not in a position to making any finding with respect to the rights protected therein.
The Committee is nonetheless concerned that there is inadequate awareness of the Convention in general,the procedures under the Optional Protocol to file claims of violations of women's rights, the Committee's general recommendations and the Committee's views and recommendations on individual communications and inquiries.
As to the claims of violations of articles 7, 8, paragraph 3(b), 15, paragraph 1, and 26, of the Covenant, the Committee is of the view that these claims have not been substantiated, for purposes of admissibility, and that they are therefore inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.
The Committee welcomes the early establishment of a national machinery for the advancement of women and gender equality and the establishment of the Office of the People's Advocate(Ombudsman),which may investigate claims of violations of human rights, including women's rights, and make recommendations to redress the violations.
The unified standing treaty body could be empowered to adjudicate claims of violations of provisions of more than one instrument in the context of the same case, provided that the State concerned is a party to both instruments.
According to the State party, articles 124 and 128 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, in force at the time of the alleged incident,laid down the competence of the Federal Constitutional Court to consider claims of violations of the rights and freedoms enshrined therein and to consider complaints"when other legal remedies are not available.
Transnational corporations and other business enterprises receiving claims of violations of these Norms shall make a record of each claim and obtain an independent investigation of the claim or call upon other proper authorities.
As a subsidiary conclusion the State party submits that the claims of violations of article 6 and article 2 relating to article 6 of the Covenant are unfounded, since the domestic court still had to decide on the possible criminal responsibility of the defendants.
Having so concluded, the Committee will not examine separately the claims of violation of article 2, paragraph 3, in conjunction with article 14.
Regarding his claims of violation of article 7 of the Covenant, the author recalls that no court ever ruled on his complaint.
In these circumstances, the Committee considers that these claims of violation are inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.
The Committee accordingly finds that the claims of violation of article 9 of the Covenant have been insufficiently substantiated, for purposes of admissibility, and is thus inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.
Complaint No. 247/2004 concerned claims of violation of articles 1, 2, 12 and 13 of the Convention.
The Committee finds, however,that the author has stated his claims of violation clearly and that the adduced material sufficiently substantiates those claims, for purposes of admissibility.
The Committee accordingly found he had failed to establish he was a Jamaican citizen andthus failed to substantiate his claims of violation of the Covenant.
As the State party does not view any other violation as having been established,it argues that the author has failed to substantiate a claim of violation of article 2.
Having reached the foregoing conclusions, together with the fact that both brothers were released alive,the Committee will not examine separately the claims of violation of article 6 read alone.
To the best of our knowledge, the World Trade Organization(WTO) Legal Service has,until now, never been confronted with any formal claim of violation of international law by WTO.