Примеры использования Countries provided a response на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Out of 26 countries that provided a response on the land cover, 18 countries provided data and 8 countries provided a response without providing data.
Sixty-four out of 71 countries provided a response on one metric relating to the land cover status indicator under SO 2(land cover) and 50 countries on the other metric land productivity.
That includes four countries that provided the data and one country that provided a response butdid not provide the data. Six out of seven countries provided a response on one metric relating to the land cover status indicator under SO 2(land cover) and three countries on the other metric land productivity.
Sixty-three countries provided a response to both compulsory indicators, which can be considered a good result bearing in mind that this is the first round of reporting on impact indicators.
Out of 64 countries that provided a response on the land cover,49 countries provided data, 14 countries provided a response without providing data and one country provided a response but considered the metric not relevant in its national context.
That includes nine countries that provided the data, one country that provided a response but did not provide the data and one country that provided a response but did not consider the indicator relevantin its national context. Nine out of 11 countries provided a response on one metric relating to the land cover status indicator under SO 2(land cover) and nine countries on the other metric land productivity.
One country provided data on land productivity,two countries provided a response without providing data and one country provided a response but considered the metric not relevant in its national context.
Out of 19 countries that provided a response on the land productivity,6 countries provided data, 12 countries provided a response without providing data and one country provided a response but considered the metric not relevant in its national context.
During the same period, the Governments of the following 39 countries provided a response to communications addressed to them in 1996 or in previous years: Afghanistan, Argentina, Armenia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Brazil, Bulgaria, China, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Egypt, El Salvador, Guatemala, Guyana, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Kenya, Malaysia, Morocco, Mexico, Myanmar, Peru, Philippines, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Syria, Togo, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States of America, Uruguay, Viet Nam.
Out of 50 countries that provided a response on land productivity,12 countries provided data, 34 countries provided a response without providing data and 4 countries provided a response but considered the metric not relevant in their national context.
Altogether, out of 11 LAC countries that provided a response, 10 countries provided a response on two impact indicators considered by decision 13/COP.9 to be the minimum reporting requirement and one country provided a response only on one of the two indicators.
Out of nine countries that provided a response on the land productivity,one country provided data, seven countries provided a response without providing data and one country provides a response but considered the metric not relevant in its national context.
When these figures are combined, it is shown that, out of 71 reporting countries, 63 countries provided a response on two impact indicators considered by decision 13/COP.9 to be the minimum reporting requirement,7 countries provided a response only on one of the two, and one country did not provide a response at all on impact indicators.
Out of 19 countries that provided a response on the land cover,13 countries provided data, 5 countries provided a response without providing data and one country that provided a response but did not consider the indicator relevant in its national context.
When these figures are combined, it is shown that,out of 28 African countries that provided a response, 26 countries provided a response on two impact indicators considered by decision 13/COP.9 to be the minimum reporting requirement, and two countries provided a response only on one of the two.
When these figures are combined, it is shown that, out of seven CEE countries that provided a response, four countries provided a response on two impact indicators considered by decision 13/COP.9 to be the minimum reporting requirement, and three countries provided a response on only one of the two impact indicators.
Out of six countries that provided a response on the land cover,five countries provided data and one country provided a response without providing data.
For those countries that provided a response in both 2010 and 2011, the latest response is used.
Out of 11 LAC countries that provided a response on at least one impact indicator, 8 countries used common baselines and methodologies and 3 did not.
Out of seven CEE countries that provided a response on at least one impact indicator, three countries used common baselines and methodologies and four did not.
Out of 28 African countries that provided a response on at least one impact indicator, 17 countries used common baselines and methodologies and 11 did not.
Out of 20 Asian countries that provided a response on at least one impact indicator, 12 countries used common baselines and methodologies and 8 did not.
All nine countries that provided a response on the land cover also provided data.
Out of the 28 countries, 26 provided a response on one metric relating to the land cover status indicator under SO 2(land cover) and 19 countries on the other metric land productivity.
That includes 25 countries that provided the data and 3 countries that provided a response but did not provide the data.
All three countries that provided a response on the land productivity responded without providing data.
That includes three countries that provided the data and one country that provided a response but did not consider the indicator relevant in its national context.
Both countries that provided a response on one indicator only, stated that they plan to provide a response on both indicators in 2016.
That includes 57 countries that provided the data,8 countries that provided a response but did not provide the data and 3 countries that provided a response but considered the indicator not relevant in their national context.
Out of 70 countries that provided a response on at least one impact indicator, 43 countries used common baselines and methodologies(i.e. provided data on both mandatory impact indicators using the template developed according to the guidance of the Committee on Science and Technology) and 27 did not.