Примеры использования Explanatory memorandum contained на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
She also drew attention to the explanatory memorandum contained in annex I to document A/68/191.
The second operative paragraph takes note of the efforts being exerted by the Malagasy Government,as described in paragraph 14 of the explanatory memorandum contained in document A/48/247.
He drew attention to the explanatory memorandum contained in annex I to document A/68/141, which made specific reference to the relevant constitutional document of the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law(UNIDROIT) and elaborated on the criteria for granting it observer status in the General Assembly.
Mrs. HASSAN(Egypt) drew the Committee's attention to the explanatory memorandum contained in document A/48/237.
He drew attention to the explanatory memorandum contained in annex I to document A/67/142 and to the text of the agreement establishing the Andean Development Corporation(CAF), and explained that CAF was a regional organization for the financing of development which had been functioning for over 40 years and provided an invaluable service to the States that utilized its services.
Mr. You Ki-Jun(Republic of Korea), introducing the draft resolution,drew attention to the explanatory memorandum contained in annex I to document A/66/198 and said that Pakistan had become a sponsor.
In the meantime, she hoped that the sponsors of the draft resolution could shed light on a number of questions that had not been adequately addressed in the explanatory memorandum contained in annex I to document A/64/235.
Mr. Bichet(Switzerland), introducing draft resolution A/C.6/64/L.6 on observer status for the International Humanitarian Fact-Finding Commission,drew attention to the explanatory memorandum contained in annex I to document A/64/142 and said that Australia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Colombia, Costa Rica, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Denmark, Guinea, Hungary, Ireland, Kenya, Mali, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, Panama, Paraguay, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and United Arab Emirates had become sponsors.
Mr. Jafarov(Azerbaijan), introducing draft resolution A/C.6/68/L.2 on behalf of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkey andhis own country, drew attention to the explanatory memorandum contained in annex I to document A/66/141.
Mr. Nazi(Italy), introducing draft resolution A/C.6/64/L.5 on observer status for the International Olympic Committee,drew attention to the explanatory memorandum contained in annex I to document A/64/145 and said that Denmark, Montenegro, Trinidad and Tobago and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia had become sponsors.
Ms. Sinegiorgis(Ethiopia), introducing the draft resolution on behalf of the sponsors-- the States members of the Intergovernmental Authority on Development(IGAD)-- drew attention to the explanatory memorandum contained in annex I to document A/66/193.
Ms. Le Fraper du Hellen(France), introducing draft resolution A/C.6/67/L.5 on observer status for the International Chamber of Commerce in the General Assembly,drew attention to the explanatory memorandum contained in annex I to document A/67/191 and announced that Finland, Monaco and Slovenia had joined as sponsors of the draft resolution.
Ms. Quidenus(Austria), introducing draft resolution A/C.6/68/L.6, said that Burkina Faso, Finland, Jordan, Mongolia, Pakistan andSpain had become sponsors; she also drew attention to the explanatory memorandum contained in annex I to document A/68/144.
Mr. Talbot(Guyana), introducing draft resolution A/C.6/66/L.3 on observer status for the Union of South American Nations(UNASUR) in the General Assembly,drew attention to the explanatory memorandum contained in annex I to document A/66/144 and announced that Cuba, Haiti, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Trinidad and Tobago had joined the list of sponsors.
Mr. Starčević(Serbia), introducing draft resolution A/C.6/66/L.5 on observer status for the Central European Initiativein the General Assembly, drew attention to the explanatory memorandum contained in annex I of document A/66/191.
Mr. Şahinol(Turkey), introducing draft resolution A/C.6/66/L.6 on observer status for United Cities and Local Governments in the General Assembly,drew attention to the explanatory memorandum contained in annex I to document A/66/192 and said that United Cities and Local Governments(UCLG) was a world organization of local and regional authorities.
Mr. Urbina(Costa Rica), introducing draft resolution A/C.6/63/L.2 on observer status for the University for Peace in the General Assembly,drew attention to the explanatory memorandum contained in annex I to document A/63/231 and announced that Colombia, Italy and Turkey had become sponsors.
The countries which had signed the request were not making any concession at all in agreeing to allocate the item to the Third Committee rather than to the plenary, for in the explanatory memorandum contained in the annex to document A/49/234, they had already named the Third Committee as the most appropriate forum.
Mr. Alshemaili(United Arab Emirates), introducing draft resolution A/C.6/66/L.4 on observer status for the International Renewable Energy Agency in the General Assembly,drew attention to the explanatory memorandum contained in annex I to document A/66/145 and said that Afghanistan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Monaco, Slovenia, the Sudan and Qatar had become sponsors.
Mr. Andanje(Kenya), introducing draft resolution A/C.6/64/L.4 on observer status for the International Conference on the Great Lakes Region of Africa in the General Assembly,drew attention to the explanatory memorandum contained in annex I to document A/64/193 and said that Australia, Benin, Egypt, Finland, Gabon, Ireland, Madagascar, New Zealand, Serbia and Tunisia had become sponsors.
Mr. Stuerchler Gonzenbach(Switzerland), introducing draft resolution A/C.6/67/L.6 on observer status for the European Organization for Nuclear Research in the General Assembly,drew attention to the explanatory memorandum contained in annex I to document A/67/192 and announced that Bulgaria, Denmark, Greece, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia and Sweden had joined as sponsors of the draft resolution.
Mr. Kydyrov(Kyrgyzstan), introducing draft resolution A/C.6/67/L.2 on observer status for the Cooperation Council of Turkic-speaking States in the General Assembly on behalf of the States members of the Cooperation Council, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Turkey,drew attention to the explanatory memorandum contained in annex I to document A/66/141 and recalled that the General Assembly, in its decision 66/527, had decided to defer a decision on the request for observer status to its sixty-seventh session.
However, referring to paragraph 6 of the explanatory memorandum(A/51/238),he asked how the Secretary-General would be able to act on the basis of a recommendation contained in an explanatory memorandum.
He drew attention to the information contained in the explanatory memorandum in annex I to document A/62/191.
He drew attention to the information contained in the explanatory memorandum in annex I to document A/62/141.
The explanatory memorandum and draft resolution contained in document A/54/235 provided the background to the request.
Mr. Patriota(Brazil) said that he welcomed the proposal made by Mongolia in document A/52/141, which contained an explanatory memorandum and a draft resolution proposing a set of guiding principles for international negotiations.
Pursuant to rule 20 of the rules of procedure of the General Assembly, he drew attention to documents A/58/197 and Add.1, which contained an explanatory memorandum(annex I) and a draft resolution annex II.
Pursuant to rule 20 of the rules of procedure of the General Assembly, he drew attention to document A/57/191 and Add.1, which contained an explanatory memorandum(annex I) and a draft resolution annex II.
It contained an explanatory memorandum in which the general considerations underlying the proposed draft articles were described and each provision was analysed in the light of the comments made at the previous session of the Committee.