Примеры использования It invokes на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It invokes the Committee's jurisprudence, in particular in Gobin v. Mauritius.
On the above basis, the author concludes that there has been a violation of article 18, as the measure at issue is neither necessary nor proportionate andthe State party has not made use of the least restrictive means to achieve the objectives it invokes.
It invokes the Committee's jurisprudence, in particular in Gobin v. Mauritius.
Moreover, in such justifications it invokes decisions of the Fourth Committee that refer not to the question of the Malvinas Islands, but to other colonial issues.
It invokes all the values, attitudes and behaviours reflecting and furthering tolerance and solidarity.
Sometimes it invokes the peace process, which began 20 years after the entry into force of the NPT.
It invokes the reservation made by Germany in relation to article 5, paragraph 2(a) of the Optional Protocol, to the effect that;
It invokes section 762 of the Criminal Procedure Act, which at the time of the complainant's imprisonment provided for pre-trial detention.
It invokes a lack of adequate staff, but the Board noted that some staff time could be reallocated to the more urgent matters.
It invokes TortoiseMerge or an external 3-way diff/merge tool to look at the files involved in the conflict and sort out which lines to use.
It invokes the long history of Israel's forcible transfer and dispossession, which adds feelings of humiliation to the personal sense of loss.
It invokes academic commentary to the effect that"only intentional, temporary gatherings of several persons for a specific purpose are afforded protection of freedom of assembly.
It invokes previous Committee decisions where it was stated that a victim has to be actually affected by the law or practice deemed to be contrary to the Covenant.
It invokes article 5, paragraph 2(a), of the Optional Protocol and its reservation, and recalls that the author filed an application in the ECHR on 19 August 2003, which was declared inadmissible on 4 November 2003.
It invokes the Committee's jurisprudence to demonstrate that article 2 does not recognize an independent right to a remedy but arises only after a violation of a Covenant right has been established.
It invokes the Committee's jurisprudence, in particular communication no. 787/1997 Gobin v. Mauritius, in which the Committee declared inadmissible a communication which had been submitted five years after the alleged violation of the Covenant.
It invokes general comment No. 14/23 of 2 November 1984 on article 6 of the Covenant, in which the Committee elaborates on the notion of arbitrary deprivation of life. It also refers to two individual opinions appended to the Committee's Views in Carpo.
It invokes the principle adopted by the European Court of Human Rights in considering the possibility of violations of article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights"No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
It invokes the definition of"refugee" within the meaning of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, which requires, inter alia, that a refugee be unwilling to avail herself, due to a wellfounded fear of persecution, of the protection of her country of nationality.
It invokes to the Constitutional Court's decision, which considered that restrictions on the publication of public opinion poll information for the time necessary to guarantee a fair election does not constitute a violation of either the Constitution or the Covenant.
It invokes the case law of the Human Rights Committee, which is on record as saying that it is not that Committee's place to question the evaluation of evidence by the domestic courts unless the evaluation amounted to a denial of justice, a precedent that should also be accepted by the Committee against Torture.
It invokes the Committee's jurisprudence, in particular communications No. 1452/2006, Chytil v. the Czech Republic, No. 1434/2005, Fillacier v. France and No. 787/1997, Gobin v. Mauritius, in which the Committee declared inadmissible communications which had been submitted with considerable delays after the alleged violation of the Covenant.
It invokes general comment 31[80] of 29 March 2004, where the Committee specified that States parties have an obligation not to expel a person from their territory"where there are substantial grounds for believing that there is a real risk of irreparable harm, such as that contemplated by articles 6 and 7 of the Covenant.
It invokes the ratio decidendi of the Committee's Views in I. Länsman et al. v. Finland, where the Committee held that States parties may wish to encourage economic development and allow economic activity, and that measures which have a certain limited impact on the way of life of persons belonging to a minority do not necessarily violate article 27.
In addition, it invokes the declaration of acceptance of the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court made by Costa Rica on 20 February 1973, under Article 36, paragraph 2, of the Statute of the Court, and that made by Nicaragua on 24 September 1929(and amended on 23 October 2001), under article 36 of the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice, which is deemed, pursuant to Article 36, paragraph 5, of the Statute of the present Court, to be acceptance of the latter's compulsory jurisdiction see A/67/4, para. 249.
For this purpose, it invoked the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice of 8 July 1996 which failed to declare the use of nuclear weapons illegal under all circumstances.
Otherwise, if e1 fails,then the choice operator backtracks to the original input position at which it invoked e1, but then calls e2 instead, returning e2's result.
The Swiss Government demanded reparation from the Italian Government for the damage sustained; it invoked the principle of good-neighbourliness and argued that Italy was liable since it tolerated the existence of an explosives factory, with all its attendant hazards, in the immediate vicinity of an international border.
In all ten cases it invoked as a basis of the Court's jurisdiction Article IX of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 9 December 1948"the Genocide Convention.
In all 10 cases it invoked as a basis of the Court's jurisdiction article IX of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, which was adopted by the General Assembly on 9 December 1948 and which is known as the Genocide Convention.