Примеры использования It is not precluded на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Accordingly, the Committee considers that it is not precluded from examining the case under this provision.
The Committee finds that it is not precluded from considering the communication under article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol.
In the circumstances and in the absence of a challenge by the State party to the admissibility of the communication,the Committee finds that it is not precluded from considering the communication under article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol.
Accordingly, it considers that it is not precluded by article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol from examining this part of the communication.
In these circumstances,the Committee concludes that the exhaustion of domestic remedies has been unreasonably prolonged and that it is not precluded by the requirements of article 22, paragraph 5(b), of the Convention, from considering the communication.
Therefore, the Committee considers that it is not precluded by the requirements of article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol from examining the main claims of the present communication.
Taking into account the authors' arguments, andin absence of any objection by the State party in this connection, the Committee considers that it is not precluded by the provisions of article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol, from examining the present communication.
Accordingly, the Committee considers that it is not precluded by article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol from examining the present communication, declares it admissible and proceeds to its examination on the merits.
The communication is presently not being considered by ECHR or examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement, and the Committee, therefore,considers that it is not precluded under article 5, paragraph 2(a), of the Optional Protocol from considering the communication.
The Committee therefore considers that it is not precluded by article 1 of the Optional Protocol from examining the communication.
In these circumstances, the Committee considers that, in the present case, it is not precluded, by article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol, from examining the communication.
Accordingly, the Committee considers that it is not precluded, by article 2(f) of the Optional Protocol from examining the present communication.
In such circumstances, the Committee considers that, in the present case, it is not precluded, for purposes of admissibility, by article 5, paragraph 2(b), from examining the communication.
The Committee considers, therefore, that it is not precluded under article 4(1) of the Optional Protocol from examining the present communication.
Accordingly the Committee considers that the author has exhausted domestic remedies in respect of this claim, and that it is not precluded from considering this part of the communication pursuant to article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol.
Accordingly, the Committee considers that it is not precluded by article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol from examining the communications on this ground.
Accordingly, the Committee considers that it is not precluded from examining the case under this provision.
Accordingly, the Committee considers that it is not precluded by the provisions of article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol from consideration of the communication.
Under such circumstances, the Committee considers that it is not precluded by article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol from examining the communication.
Accordingly, the Committee finds that it is not precluded from examining the communication by the requirements of article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol.
Accordingly, the Committee considers that it is not precluded by article 2 of the Optional Protocol from examining the communication.
In the circumstances, the Committee finds that it is not precluded from considering the communication under article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol.
Accordingly, the Committee considers that it is not precluded from considering the communication by the requirements of article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol.
In the circumstances,the Committee finds that it is not precluded from considering the communication under article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol.
In the light of the above, the Committee concludes that it is not precluded by the requirements of article 22, paragraph 5(b), of the Convention, from considering the communication.
Accordingly, the Committee considers that it is not precluded by the requirements of article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol from examining the present communication.
Accordingly, the Committee considers that it is not precluded by the requirements of article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol from examining the present communication.
In the circumstances, the Committee finds that it is not precluded from considering the communication under article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol.
As regards permanent regional representation, it is not precluded that a region may determine its own selection, prior to election by the General Assembly.
Accordingly, the Committee considers that it is not precluded from considering the present communication, in accordance with article 5, paragraph 2(a), of the Optional Protocol.