Примеры использования Parties to protocol на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
States Parties to Protocol I on Non-Detectable Fragments;
Such an assessment was still exclusively the responsibility of the High Contracting Parties to Protocol V. In that regard, he advocated restoring the agreed language adopted in the preceding report.
Parties to Protocol I agree to prevent their nationals and vessels from fishing with drift-nets in the Convention Area.
ICRC called upon the remaining States parties to Protocol I, and those still to become parties, to make that declaration.
If it deems appropriate for the conduct of its business the Conference may establish subsidiary organs, such as committees, working groups or other bodies,open to the participation of all High Contracting Parties to Protocol V. Officers.
Люди также переводят
There were now 86 High Contracting Parties to Protocol V. While that was a respectable number, universalization efforts must be intensified.
Finally, Article 36 obliges the parties to Protocol I to determine whether the acquisition, development or use of a new weapon would be compatible with international law.
Mr. NGUYEN DUY CHIEN(Viet Nam) requested clarification from the sponsors regarding paragraph 3 of the draft resolution,which called upon all States that were already parties to Protocol I to make the declaration provided for under article 90 of that Protocol. .
Finally, Article 36 obliges the parties to Protocol I to determine whether the acquisition, development or use of a new weapon would be compatible with international law.
Mr. SALAND(Sweden) said that the declaration in question meant that a State accepted the competence of the International Fact-Finding Commission pursuant to article 90 of Protocol I. States could become parties to Protocol I without making the declaration, while States which were already parties to Protocol I and had not yet made the declaration could do so at a later time.
There were 168 States parties to Protocol I and 164 to Protocol II. Protocol III had entered into force in 2007 with 33 States parties. .
Mr. Varma(India) said that it was a privilege for India to hold the presidency of the Third Conference of the High Contracting Parties to Protocol V. India was fully committed to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons and the humanitarian principles it embodied.
States parties to Protocol I should be encouraged to make the declaration under article 90 to accept the competence of the International Fact-Finding Commission and to make use of its services.
With 135 States parties to Protocol I and 125 to Protocol II, two thirds of the world's States had embraced those treaties, while in other States the process of ratification was at an advanced stage.
Thailand agreed with the Secretary-General that"States Parties to international humanitarian law treaties[had] a legally binding commitment to adopt… national legislation, so as to be in a position to respect and ensure respect for the law in all circumstances"(A/59/321), andlooked forward to joining the other States Parties to Protocol I.
Calls upon all States which are already parties to Protocol I, or those States not parties, on becoming parties to Protocol I,to make the declaration provided for under article 90 of that Protocol; .
The Second Conference also decided to request the CCW Protocol V informal Meeting of Experts in 2009 to make recommendations on the above for consideration by the Third Conference of the High Contracting Parties to Protocol V. In doing so, the Meeting of Experts shall take into account the proposals and suggestions presented during the 2008 Meeting of Experts and the Second Conference.
Calls upon all States that are already parties to Protocol I, or those States not parties, on becoming parties to Protocol I, to make the declaration provided for under article 90 of that Protocol; .
The letters had been co-signed by the Chairperson of the 2009 Meeting of the High Contracting Parties to the Convention,the President of the Eleventh Annual Conference of the High Contracting Parties to Amended Protocol II and the President of the Third Conference of the High Contracting Parties to Protocol V. Similar letters had been addressed to High Contracting Parties inviting them to review their participation in the CCW framework.
It would further call upon all States that are already parties to Protocol I, or those States not parties, on becoming parties to Protocol I,to make the declaration provided for under article 90 of that Protocol. .
Ii On the WISP.V information system: the 2009 Meeting of Experts should further consider the establishment of the Protocol V information system in order to prepare a comprehensive final proposal for consideration andadoption by the Third Conference of the High Contracting Parties to Protocol V. For this purpose the Coordinator should further elaborate the details of the Protocol V information system and prepare a proposal for the Third Conference of the High Contracting Parties. .
The Assembly would call upon those States that are already parties to Protocol I, or those that, though they are not yet parties to it, will become parties, to make the declaration provided for under article 90 of that Protocol. .
The Second Conference took note of the concept for a Web-based Information System for Protocol V(WISP. V) and decided that the 2009 Meeting of Experts should further consider the establishment of the WISP.V and prepare a comprehensive proposal for consideration andfinal adoption by the Third Conference of the High Contracting Parties to Protocol V. For this purpose the Coordinator should further elaborate the details of the Protocol V information system and prepare a proposal for the Third Conference of the High Contracting Parties. .
However, of the 135 States parties to Protocol I, only 41 had thus far made the declaration recognizing ipso facto and without special agreement the competence of the International Fact-Finding Commission to inquire into any facts alleged to represent a grave violation of international humanitarian law and to facilitate the restoration of respect for the law.
India is privileged to be part of the small group of countries that has ratified all the instruments of the CCW package, andwill have the honour of chairing the Third Conference of the High Contracting Parties to Protocol V. India has also proposed a broad-based dialogue to consider a new and strengthened format for the CCW that would by common agreement reaffirm and strengthen the application of international law in regulating and protecting the victims of warfare.
Calls upon all States that are already parties to Protocol I, or those States not parties, on becoming parties to Protocol I, to make the declaration provided for under article 90 of that Protocol and to consider making use, where appropriate, of the services of the International Humanitarian Fact-Finding Commission in accordance with the provisions of article 90 of Protocol I;
His delegation believed that cooperation and assistance, and requests for assistance, should continue to be a priority issue at the meetings of experts andthe conferences of the High Contracting Parties to Protocol V. As a long-standing participant in international demining activities, Brazil encouraged all Parties, relevant international organizations and institutions to consider providing assistance in response to requests by States affected by explosive remnants of war.
At the Third Review Conference there were 98 States parties to Protocol I on Non-Detectable Fragments, 87 to Protocol II on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Mines, Booby-Traps and Other Devices, 86 to Amended Protocol II, 93 to Protocol III on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Incendiary Weapons, 83 to Protocol IV on Blinding Laser Weapons and 27 to Protocol V on Explosive Remnant of War.