Примеры использования Reservation is considered на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
- 
                                                                                        Official
                                                                                    
 - 
                                                                                        Colloquial
                                                                                    
 
The reservation is considered non-guaranteed without payment.
A State that withdraws an objection formulated earlier against a reservation is considered to have accepted that reservation. .
In such case, the reservation is considered as having been  formulated at the date of the initial communication.
A State or an international organization that withdraws an objection formulated to a reservation  is considered to have accepted that reservation.
There is  insufficient clarity as to when a reservation is considered"manifestly impermissible", particularly as this provision purports to extend to all three categories of impermissible reservations  in article 19.
In the absence of a notification by the State concerned,the Secretariat General shall inform that State that its declaration or reservation is considered to have been  extended automatically for a period of six months.
Unless the treaty otherwise provides, a[A] reservation  is considered to have been  accepted by a State or an international organization if it shall have raised no objection to the reservation  in accordance with guidelines 2.6.1 to 2.6.14.
To use such a service in Italy, in agreement with the Italian Civil Laws, the Regulations of the IAH(International Association of Hotel) andof the FIAVET(International Federation of Travel Agents), a reservation is considered valid with the advance payment of a deposit caparra confirmatoria.
If a person wants to pay the entire amount at the end of transfer, the reservation is considered valid only when he sends confirmation mail to the administrator for 24 hours before the transfer was  agreed to start.
In order to most effectively rebut the presumption,the reserving State would presumably indicate when making a reservation whether it is  willing to be  bound without benefit of the reservation  if it turns out that the reservation  is considered invalid.
On the other hand, the mere fact that the reason for the objection is  that the reservation is considered incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty is  not sufficient.
Unless the treaty otherwise provides, a reservation is considered to have been  accepted by a State or an international organization if it shall have raised no objection to the reservation  by the end of a period of twelve months after it was  notified of the reservation  or by the date on which it expressed its consent to be  bound by the treaty, whichever is  later.
However, in the case in point, the author of the invalid reservation  does not"withdraw" from the treaty, butsignals its intention not to be  bound by the treaty insofar as its reservation  is considered invalid, since, in its eyes, the reservation is  a decisive element of its treaty commitment.
Unless the treaty otherwise provides, a reservation is considered to have been  accepted by a State or an international organization if it shall have raised no objection to the reservation  within the time period provided for in guideline 2.6.13.
Acceptance of a reservation  to a constituent instrument that has not yet entered into force In the case set forth in guideline 2.8.8 and where the constituent instrument has not yet entered into force, a reservation is considered to have been  accepted if no signatory State or signatory international organization has raised an objection to that reservation  within a period of twelve months after they were  notified of that reservation. .
On the other hand, the mere fact that the reason for the objection is  that the reservation is considered incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty is  not sufficient to exclude the entry into force of the treaty between the author of the objection and the author of the reservation. .
In cases where a reservation  affecting Convention provisions onracist speech is  maintained, States parties are  invited to provide information as to why such a reservation is considered necessary, the nature and scope of the reservation,  its precise effects in terms of national law and policy, and any plans to limit or withdraw the reservation  within a specified time frame.
For the purposes of paragraphs 2 and 4 andunless the treaty otherwise provides, a reservation is considered to have been  accepted by a State if it shall have raised no objection to the reservation  by the end of a period of twelve months after it was  notified of the reservation  or by the date on which it expressed its consent to be  bound by the treaty, whichever is  later.
However, a State orinternational organization that withdraws its objection to a reservation  is considered to have accepted the reservation(see paras. 157-160 above), which precludes it from subsequently raising another objection against it.
For the purposes of paragraphs 2 and 4 andunless the treaty otherwise provides, a reservation is considered to have been  accepted by a State or an international organization if it shall have raised no objection to the reservation  by the end of a period of twelve months after it was  notified of the reservation  or by the date on which it expressed its consent to be  bound by the treaty, whichever is  later.
Article 20, paragraph 5, of the aforementioned Vienna Convention,which provides that a reservation is considered to have been  accepted in the absence of an objection to it, does not provide that such a silence should have for effect the acceptance of an impermissible reservation. .
Following article 20, paragraph 5, of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, a reservation is considered to have been  accepted by a State if it shall have raised no objection to the reservation  by the end of a period of 12 months after it was  notified of the reservation. .
As the[Secretariat] is  aware, article 20, paragraph 5, of the Vienna Convention states that'a reservation is considered to have been  accepted by a State if it shall have raised no objection to the reservation  by the end of a period of twelve months after it was  notified of the reservation. .
In the case set forth in guideline 2.8.7 and where the constituent instrument has not yet entered into force, a reservation is considered to have been  accepted if no signatory State or signatory international organization has raised an objection to that organization by the end of a period of 12 months after they were  notified of that reservation. .
In the case set forth in guideline 2.8.7 and where the constituent instrument has not yet entered into force, a reservation is considered to have been  accepted if no signatory State or signatory international organization has raised an objection to that reservation  by the end of a period of 12 months after they were  notified of that reservation. .
In the case set forth in guideline 2.8.8 and where the constituent instrument has not yet entered into force, a reservation is considered to have been  accepted if no signatory State or signatory international organization has raised an objection to that reservation  within a period of twelve months after they were  notified of that reservation. .
Unless the treaty otherwise provides[or, for some other reason,an express acceptance is  required], a reservation is considered to have been  accepted by a State or an international organization if it shall have raised no objection to the reservation  by the end of a period of 12 months after it was  notified of the reservation  or by the date on which it expressed its consent to be  bound by the treaty, whichever is  later.
Under article 20(2) of the Convention, a reservation was considered incompatible if at least two thirds of States parties objected to it- the Committee was  not mentioned.
Reservations are considered definitive upon receipt of a prepayment of at least 30% of the total amount of the reservation  by means of bank transfer or credit card.
Draft guideline 2.1.8 and the associated commentary were  also of concern;they should indicate more clearly when a reservation was considered"manifestly valid", given that the provision purported to extend to all three categories of impermissible reservations  in article 19.