Примеры использования The author points out на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The author points out that family farming.
There were very few survivors, and the author points out that his son may have died at that time.
The author points out that the State party has not referred to this letter in its observations.
Finally, on the issue of authorization from the author to file to the complaint, the author points out that she signed the original copy of the communication submitted to the Committee.
The author points out that it is the Government who decides which cases are to be brought before a special court.
Люди также переводят
As regards the revoking of the expulsion order andthe abolition of the restrictions, the author points out that the State party has not yet recognized that he was no potential terrorist.
However, as the author points out, the logistics of rolling stock was worn out. .
In his comments of 17 November 2003, the author points out that his complaint makes no reference to a right to citizenship.
The author points out that the International Committee of the Red Cross has called for a moratorium on cluster bombs.
Furthermore, referring to well-established jurisprudence of the Committee, the author points out that, in the absence of comments on the merits of the communication, the applicant's allegations must be taken fully into account.
The author points out that there were no independent witnesses that would prolong the investigation.
Summing up the research, the author points out on concrete complexities, arising in the course of realization of the named activity.
The author points out that he was arrested on 9 July 1985 and tried from 1 to 5 October 1987, i.e., almost 27 months later.
In this connection, the author points out that after the preliminary examination in August 1983, he did not meet with his counsel until the day of the trial.
The author points out that this decision was taken within one month, whereas it is usually necessary to wait one year for such a decision.
As to the right of petition, the author points out that, as the law in question has been interpreted, an action by an agency on a petition has no legally binding effect.
Finally, the author points out that the State party has not addressed his claim of a violation of article 14, paragraph 1, of the Covenant.
The author points out that as a complementary punishment, the court's decision was sent to his employer, which could have resulted in his dismissal.
The author points out the role of group work in development of critical thinking of students, as well as in formation of ability to solve problem situations.
The author points out that he was arrested on 9 March 1982, tried on 6 December 1983 and that the Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal on 10 April 1987.
The author points out that Bekhterev explained the essence of the education process through the theory of evolutionary monism.
The author points out that the State party did not comment on his claims under article 14, paragraphs 2 and 5, even though the Committee declared them admissible.
The author points out that the State party should have opposed Austria's decisions regarding the application of the Luxembourg Convention see paragraph 4.2.
The author points out that during the time of the investigation and at the time of the court proceedings, a new Criminal Code had entered into force on 1 January 1997.
The author points out that according to the State party's submission, matters pertaining to persons with disability are merely a"concern" but not a"right" see para. 3.26 above.
The author points out the strategic character of the relations between two countries, and possible negative effects that may be caused by Donald Trump's declarations addressed to Mexico.
The author points out that, for all material purposes, the relevant illegal conduct in Ridgeway v. The Queen was identical to his own subsequent conduct.
The author points out that the"temporary or transitional provisions" mentioned in the reservation of the United Kingdom have lasted for more than 20 years.
The author points out that the State party is required to submit"explanations or statements that shall relate both to the communication's admissibility and its merits.
The author points out that the authorities of the Netherlands found her statements credible and that the facts of the case were not disputed by the State party.