Примеры использования The special rapporteur had proposed на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
This is the course that the Special Rapporteur had proposed.
The Special Rapporteur had proposed them only tentatively.
In responding to those questions, the Special Rapporteur had proposed to redraft article 7.
The Special Rapporteur had proposed a new text for the article on aggression.
Lastly, it seemed appropriate to change the title of the topic to"reservations to treaties", as the Special Rapporteur had proposed.
The Special Rapporteur had proposed retaining the provision in the draft articles.
Mr. Lallah supported Ms. Chanet's proposal;however, the Special Rapporteur had proposed suspending the procedure, not terminating it.
The Special Rapporteur had proposed three draft articles that had been considered by ILC.
After analysing the various suggestions contained in the comments of Governments, the Special Rapporteur had proposed retaining the provision as adopted on first reading.
The Special Rapporteur had proposed a three-step dispute settlement regime which would help eliminate or minimize countermeasures.
On the basis of relevant international instruments and jurisprudence as well as national legislation andcase law, the Special Rapporteur had proposed a draft article 9, on grounds for expulsion.
In the light of the debate, the Special Rapporteur had proposed a revised text for draft article 8.
Some members had urged caution with respect to the concept of particular damages for interruption of the"life plan",recognized by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, which the Special Rapporteur had proposed to address in the commentary.
In his second report, the Special Rapporteur had proposed a general framework and a set of six draft articles.
The Special Rapporteur had proposed a positive definition of interpretative declarations containing elements that were common to reservations and to interpretative declarations.
As an element of progressive development andon the basis of relevant case law, the Special Rapporteur had proposed a draft article 8 stating the prohibition of extradition disguised as expulsion.
The Special Rapporteur had proposed excluding armed conflict from the definition, in order to preserve the integrity of international humanitarian law.
On the basis of the above considerations, the Special Rapporteur had proposed the definition of a strictly unilateral declaration contained in paragraph 142 of the Commission's report.
The Special Rapporteur had proposed an interesting draft article 16 concerning the Calvo clause, by which an individual contractually waived the right to diplomatic protection.
In his tenth report(A/CN.4/558 and Add.1), the Special Rapporteur had proposed using the term"validity" instead of controversial terms such as"permissibility","admissibility" and"opposability.
The Special Rapporteur had proposed clarifying the reference to articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties by reintroducing a reference to the intention of the parties.
It would be recalled that already at the previous session the Special Rapporteur had proposed to deal with the topic in temporal phases rather than considering each legal regime individually as a distinct category.
Secondly, the Special Rapporteur had proposed that the fact that a treaty provision reflected a customary norm should not in itself prevent the formulation of a reservation to that provision.
He summarized the three options that the Special Rapporteur had proposed in his report, regarding the future course of the work on liability; they appeared in paragraph 604 of the Commission's report.
The Special Rapporteur had proposed retaining draft article 11 largely as adopted on first reading, although the effect of an armed conflict on a treaty was sometimes best evaluated in hindsight.
With regard to the diplomatic protection of corporations and shareholders, the Special Rapporteur had proposed that the Barcelona Traction rule should be adopted, and in that regard it had to be determined whether that rule was an accurate statement of customary international law or whether international law had evolved since the adoption of the decision.
The Special Rapporteur had proposed that there should be a critical evaluation of achievements and shortcomings under the relevant provisions of the peace accords, particularly the Agreement on Identity and Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
While most of the crimes which the Special Rapporteur had proposed for deletion reflected practices which no longer existed, that did not justify their absence from the draft Code.
Such a provision is the exact opposite of what the Special Rapporteur had proposed in previous reports with regard to Marshal Mobutu, namely, that without limits on his powers, there could be neither democracy nor respect for human rights.15.